Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Beyond Therapy: Problem‐Solving Courts and the Deliberative Democratic State

  • Rekha Mirchandani

Abstract

Problem‐solving courts (drug courts, community courts, domestic violence courts, and mental health courts), unlike traditional courts, attempt to get at the root of the individual and social problems that motivate criminal behavior. Theoretical understandings of problem‐solving courts are mostly Foucauldian; proponents argue that these new institutions employ therapeutic techniques that encourage individuals to self‐engineer in ways that subtly increase state power. The Foucauldian approach captures only some elements of problem‐solving courts and does not fully theorize the revolution in justice that these courts present. Problem‐solving courts, domestic violence courts in particular, orient not just around individual change but also around social change and cultural transformation. Combining the Foucauldian idea of a therapeutic state (as developed by James Nolan) with an understanding of the deliberative democratic mechanisms of larger‐scale structural transformation (found in Habermas and others) leads to a more balanced and empirically open orientation to the actual motivations, goals, and achievements of problem‐solving courts.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Abel, Richard L., ed. 1982. The Politics of Informal Justice. New York: Academic Press.
Auerbach, Jerold. 1983. Justice Without Law? New York: Oxford University Press.
Beasley, Michele E., and Thomas, Dorothy Q. 1994. Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Issue. In The Public Nature of Private Violence, ed. Fineman, Martha Albertson and Mykitiuk, Roxanne, 323–48. New York: Routledge.
Beckett, Katherine. 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beckett, Katherine, and Sasson, Theodore. 2004. The Politics of Injustice: Crime and Punishment in America. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Berman, Greg. 2000. What Is a Traditional Judge Anyway?: Problem‐Solving in State Courts. Judicature 84:7885.
Berman, Greg, and Feinblatt, John. 2001. Problem‐Solving Courts: A Brief Primer. Law & Policy 23:125–40.
Berman, Greg, and Feinblatt, John. 2005. Good Courts: The Case for Problem‐Solving Justice. New York: New Press.
Boldt, Richard. 1998. Rehabilitative Punishment and the Drug Court Movement. Washington University Law Quarterly 76:12051306.
Casey, Timothy. 2004. When Good Intentions Are Not Enough: Problem‐Solving Courts and the Impending Crisis of Legitimacy. Southern Methodist Law Review 57:14591519.
Clarke, Cait, and Neuhard, James. 2004. “From Day One”: Who's in Control as Problem Solving and Client‐Centered Sentencing Take Center Stage? New York University Law & Social Change 29:1156.
Clear, Todd R., and Karp, David R. 1999. The Community Justice Ideal: Preventing Crime and Achieving Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Cohen, Stanley. 1985. Visions of Social Control. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cohen, Stanley, and Scull, Andrew. 1983. Social Control and the State. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Copelon, Rhonda. 1994. Recognizing the Egregious in the Everyday: Domestic Violence as Torture. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 25:291367.
Council of State Governments. 2005. Mental Health Courts: A National Snapshot. http://consensusproject.org/mhcp/national‐snapshot.pdf (accessed May 25, 2008).
Donzelot, Jacques. 1979. The Policing of Families. New York: Pantheon Books.
Dorf, Michael C., and Fagan, Jeffrey A. 2003. Community Courts and Community Justice: From Innovation to Institutionalization. American Criminal Law Review 40:1501–11.
Dorf, Michael C., and Sabel, Charles F. 1998. A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism. Columbia Law Review 98:267473.
Dorf, Michael C., and Sabel, Charles F. 2000. Drug Treatment Courts and Emergent Experimentalist Government. Vanderbilt Law Review 53:829–83.
Eaton, Leslie, and Kaufman, Leslie. 2005. In Problem‐Solving Court, Judges Turn Therapist. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/26/nyregion/26courts.html (accessed May 25, 2008).
Epstein, Deborah. 1999. Effective Intervention in Domestic Violence Cases: Rethinking the Roles of Prosecutors, Judges and the Court System. Yale Law Journal & Feminism 11:350.
Fagan, Jeffrey, and Malkin, Victoria. 2003. Problem Solving Courts and Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Theorizing Community Justice through Community Courts. Fordham Urban Law Journal 30:897953.
Feeley, Malcolm. 1979. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 1988. The Rise and Rise of Informalism. In Informal Justice?, ed. Matthews, Roger, 178–98. London: Sage.
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter, 87104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel. 1965. Madness and Civilization. Trans. Howard, Richard. New York: Random House.
Garland, David. 1990. Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garland, David, and Sparks, Richard. 2000. Criminology and Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1987. Nine Theses on the Future of Sociology. In Social Theory and Modern Sociology, ed. Giddens, Anthony, 2251. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Goldkamp, John S. 1994. Justice and Treatment Innovation: The Drug Court Movement. Working Paper of the First National Drug Court Conference, December 1993, National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
Goldkamp, John S. 2000. The Drug Court Response: Issues and Implications for Justice Change. Albany Law Review 63:923–61.
Goldkamp, John S. 2002. Problem‐Solving Courts: From Adversarial Litigation to Innovative Jurisprudence. Fordham Urban Law Journal 29:2000–09.
Goldkamp, John S., and Irons‐Guynn, Cheryl. 2000. Emerging Judicial Strategies for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Caseload: Mental Health Courts in Fort Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.
Goldkamp, John S., White, Michael D., and Robinson, Jennifer B. 2001. Do Drug Courts Work? Getting Inside the Drug Court Black Box. Journal of Drug Issues 31:2772.
Gordon, Colin. 1991. Governmental Rationality: An Introduction. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter, 152. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gordon, Colin. 2000. Introduction. In Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1084, ed. Faubion, James D., xixli. New York: New Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984 1981. Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1987 1984. Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System. Trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Burger, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1992. Further Reflections on the Public Sphere. In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Calhoun, Craig, 421–62. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trans. Rheg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harrington, Christine. 1985. Shadow Justice: The Ideology and Institutionalization of Alternatives to Court. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Hoffman, Morris. 2000. The Drug Court Scandal. North Carolina Law Review 78:14371534.
Hofrichter, Richard. 1987. Neighborhood Justice in Capitalist Society: The Expansion of the Informal State. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Hora, Peggy Fulton, Schma, William G., and Rosenthal, John T. A. 1999. Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Drug Court Movement: Revolutionizing the Criminal Justice System's Approach to Drug Abuse and Crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review 742:439538.
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor W. 1987 1944. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. Cumming, John. New York: Continuum.
Karan, Amy, Kelitz, Susan, and Denaro, Sharon. 1999. Domestic Violence Courts: What are They and How Should We Manage Them? Juvenile and Family Court Journal Spring:7586.
Kaye, Judith. 2006. Refinement or Reinvention, the State of Reform in New York: The Courts. Albany Law Review 69:831–50.
Kaye, Judith. 2004. Delivering Justice Today: A Problem‐Solving Approach. Yale Law & Policy Review 22:125–52.
Kaye, Judith. 2002. Problem‐Solving Courts: From Adversarial Litigation to Innovative Jurisprudence: Eleventh Annual Symposium on Contemporary Urban Challenges: The Changing Face of Justice. Keynote Address. Fordham Urban Law Journal 29:1925–28.
Keilitz, Susan. 2000. Specialized Domestic Violence Case Management: A National Survey. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
Lazerson, Mark H. 1982. In the Halls of Justice, the Only Justice is in the Halls. In The Politics of Informal Justice: The American Experience, ed. Abel, Richard L., 119–63. New York: Academic Press.
Lee, Eric. 2000. Community Courts: An Evolving Model. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance.
Lind, E. Allen, and Tyler, Tom R. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Littel, Kristen. 2003. Specialized Courts and Domestic Violence. http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itdhr/0503/ijde/littel.htm (accessed July 15, 2008).
Marcus, Isabel. 1994. Reframing Domestic Violence: Terrorism in the Home. In The Public Nature of Private Violence, ed. Fineman, Martha Albertson and Mykitiuk, Roxanne, 1135. New York: Routledge.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1991 1964. One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
McPherson, Miller, Smith‐Lovin, Lynn, and Brashears, Matthew E. 2006. Social Isolation in American: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades. American Sociological Review 71:353–75.
Malkin, Victoria. 2005. The End of Welfare as We Know It: What Happens When the Judge is in Charge. Critique of Anthropology 25:361–88.
Matthews, Roger. 1988. Informal Justice? London: Sage.
Menkel‐Meadow, Carrie. 2004. The Lawyer's Role in Deliberative Democracy: A Commentary By and Responses to Carrie Menkel‐Meadow. Nevada Law Journal 5:347–69.
Menkel‐Meadow, Carrie. 2006. Peace and Justice: Notes on the Evolution and Purposes of Legal Processes: Inaugural Lecture of the A. B. Chettle, Jr. Chair in Dispute Resolution and Civil Procedure. Georgetown Law Journal 94:553–80.
Merry, Sally Engle. 1982. The Social Organization of Mediation in Nonindustrial Societies: Implications for Informal Community Justice in America. In The Politics of Informal Justice: Comparative Studies, ed. Abel, Richard L., 1746. New York: Academic Press.
Meschievitz, Catherine S., and Galanter, Marc. 1982. In Search of Nyaya Panchyats: The Politics of a Moribund Institution. In The Politics of Informal Justice: Comparative Studies, ed. Abel, Richard L., 4773. New York: Academic Press.
Nolan, James L. 1998. The Therapeutic State: Justifying Government at Century's End. New York: New York University Press.
Nolan, James L. 2001. Reinventing Justice: The American Drug Court Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nolan, James L. 2002a. Drug Courts in Theory and in Practice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Nolan, James L. 2002b. Therapeutic Adjudication. Society 39:2939.
Nolan, James L. 2003. Redefining Criminal Courts: Problem‐Solving and the Meaning of Justice. American Criminal Law Review 40:1541–66.
Ostrom, Brian J., and Kauder, Neal B. 1999. Examining the Work of State Courts. Report of the National Center for State Courts. On file with author.
Pavlich, George. 1996. The Power of Community Mediation: Government and Formation of Self‐Identity. Law & Society Review 30:707–34.
Pavlich, George. 2005. Governing Paradoxes of Restorative Justice. London: Glasshouse Press.
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, Robert D., and Feldstein, Lewis M. 2003. Better Together: Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rice, Stephanie. 2007. Domestic Violence and the Courts: What Next? The Columbian. http://www.columbian.com/printArticle.cfm?story=130295 (article no longer available).
Rieff, Phillip. 1966. The Triumph of the Therapeutic. New York: Harper & Row.
Rogers, Matthew. 1988. Informal Justice? London: Sage.
Rose, Nikolas. 1996. The Death of the Social? Re‐Figuring the Territory of Government. Economy and Society 25:327–56.
Rose, Nikolas. 1999a. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. New York: Free Association Books.
Rose, Nikolas. 1999b. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, Nikolas, O'Malley, Pat, and Valverde, Mariana. 2006. Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2:83104.
Schma, William G. 2003. Problem‐Solving Courts: Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Michigan Bar Journal 82:2527.
Schneider, Elizabeth M. 1994. The Violence of Privacy. In The Public Nature of Private Violence, ed. Fineman, Martha Albertson and Mykitiuk, Roxanne, 3658. New York: Routledge.
Simon, Jonathan. 2000. Megan's Law: Crime and Democracy in Late Modern America. Law & Social Inquiry 25 (4): 1111–50.
Simon, Jonathan. 2007. Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created A Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sirianni, Carmen. 2001. Civic Innovation in America: Community Empowerment, Public Policy and the Movement for Civic Renewal. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sirianni, Carmen. 2005. The Civic Renewal Movement: Community‐Building and Democracy in the United States. Kettering, OH: Kettering Foundation Press.
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Spinak, Jane. 2003. Community Courts and Community Justice: Commentary: Why Defenders Feel Defensive: The Defender's Role in Problem‐Solving Courts. American Criminal Law Review 40:1617–24.
Thompson, Jennifer. 2004. Who's Afraid of Judicial Activism? Reconceptualizing a Traditional Paradigm in the Context of Specialized Domestic Violence Court Programs. Maine Law Review 56:407–35.
Tjaden, Patricia, and Thoennes, Nancy. 2000. Extent and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Research Report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
Tsai, Betsey. 2000. The Trend toward Specialized Domestic Violence Courts: Improvements on an Effective Innovation. Fordham Law Review 68:12851327.
Wacquant, Loic. 2001. Deadly Symbiosis: When Ghetto and Prison Meet and Mesh. In Mass Imprisonment: Social Causes and Consequences, ed. Garland, David, 82120. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wacquant, Loic. 2005. The New “Peculiar Institution”: On the Prison as Surrogate Ghetto. In Race, Crime and Justice: A Reader, ed. Gabbidon, Shaun L. and Greene, Helen Taylor. New York: Routledge.
Warchol, Glen. 1999. Domestic Violence Group Honors Four for Service. Salt Lake Tribune, December 15, B‐2.
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wexler, David B., and Winick, Bruce J. 1996. Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Winick, Bruce J. 1997. The Jurisprudence of Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Psychology, Public Policy and Law 3:184206.
Winick, Bruce J. 2000. Applying the Law Therapeutically in Domestic Violence Cases. University of Missouri—Kansas City School of Law Review 69:3392.
Winick, Bruce J. 2003. Special Series: Problem Solving Courts and Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Problem Solving Courts. Fordham Urban Law Journal 30:1055–90.
Yin, Robert. 2003a. Applications of Case Study Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, Robert. 2003b. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Beyond Therapy: Problem‐Solving Courts and the Deliberative Democratic State

  • Rekha Mirchandani

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed