Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Primaries vs. Quotas: Gender and Candidate Nominations in Mexico, 2003

  • Lisa Baldez (a1)

Abstract

Parties throughout Latin America have recently addressed two distinct kinds of electoral reforms: primary elections and national-level gender quota laws. This study examines how these reforms interact, their mutual compatibility, and their effect on the nomination of men compared to that of women. It develops a series of hypotheses about this relationship by analyzing the 2003 legislative elections in Mexico, a case in which the three main parties relied on both gender quotas and primaries to select their candidates. Although the percentage of women elected to the Mexican Chamber of Deputies rose, the Federal Electoral Institute interpreted the gender quota law in a way that weakened its effect on women and limited the degree of openness in the primaries that were held.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Primaries vs. Quotas: Gender and Candidate Nominations in Mexico, 2003
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Primaries vs. Quotas: Gender and Candidate Nominations in Mexico, 2003
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Primaries vs. Quotas: Gender and Candidate Nominations in Mexico, 2003
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aragón, Hortensia. 2002. Prd Deputy. Author interview. Mexico City, July 15.
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. Elected Bodies: the Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, 2: 231–58.
Baldez, Lisa. Forthcoming. Gender Quotas in Mexico. In Han funcionado las cuotas en América Latina? El impacto de la representación política de las mujeres, ed. Marcela, Rios. Santiago: FLACSO.
Barreda, Mikel. 2004. La democracia interna de los partidos: un desafio del desarrollo en América Latina. Gobernanza: Revista Internacional Para el Desarrollo Humano. http://www.iigov.orggbzarticle.drt ?edi=14282art=14303 Accessed April 6, 2006.
Bruhn, Kathleen. 2003. Whores and Lesbians: Political Activism, Party Strategies, and Gender Quotas in Mexico. Electoral Studies 22: 101–19.
Bruhn, Kathleen. 2004. The Making of the Mexican President, 2000: Parties, Candidates, and Campaign Strategy. In Domínguez and Lawson 2004. 123–56.
Camp, Roderic Ai. 2004. Citizen Attitudes toward Democracy and Vicente Fox's Victory in 2000. In Domínguez and Lawson 2004. 25–46.
Cárdenas, García, Jaime, Fernando. 1992. Crisis de legitimidad y democracia interna de los partidos políticos. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Carey, John M., and John, Polga-Hecimovich. 2006. Primary Elections and Candidate Strength in Latin America. Journal of Politics 68, 3: 530–43.
Carranza, Aguayo, Marta, Laura, and Roberto Ortiz, Vega. 2002. Staff members, Instituto Nacional de la Mujer. Author interview. Mexico City, July 18.
Crocker, Adriana. 2003. Women and Political Participation through Quotas: the Case of Argentina. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 28–31.
Dahlerup, Drude. 2003. Quotas as a “Fast Track” to Equal Political Representation for Women. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 28–31.
Dahlerup, Drude, ed. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
De Luca, Miguel, Jones, Mark P., and Tula, María Inés. 2002. Back Rooms or Ballot Boxes? Candidate Nomination in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies 35, 4: 413–36.
De Remes, Alain. 2006. Democratization and Dispersion of Power: New Scenarios in Mexican Federalism. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 22, 1: 175–204.
Domínguez, Jorge I., and Chappell, Lawson, eds. 2004. Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Eisenstadt, Todd A. 2004. Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
González, Concepción. 2002. Pri Deputy; Chair, Gender and Equity Committee, Chamber of Deputies. Author interview. Mexico City, July 17.
González, María de la Luz. 2006. Rechazan ley de cuotas en Sinaloa. Cimacnoticias.com. http:cimacnoticias.comnoticias06mar06033111.html Accessed April 26, 2006.
Gray, Tricia. 2003. Electoral Gender Quotas: Lessons from Argentina and Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research 22, 1: 52–78.
Grayson, George W. 2003. Beyond the mid-term Elections: Mexico's Political Outlook, 2003–2006. Washington, Dc: Center for Strategic and International Studies. http://www.csis.orgamericasmexicopubs.cfm Accessed March 25, 2004.
Htun, Mala. 2004. Is Gender like Ethnicity? the Political Representation of Identity Groups. Perspectives on Politics 2, 3: 4–24.
Htun, Mala, and Jones, Mark P.. 2002. Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Electoral Quotas and Women's Leadership in Latin America. In Gender, Rights and Justice in Latin America, ed. Craske, Nikki and Molyneux, Maxine. London: Palgrave. 6993.
Instituto Federal Electoral (IFE). 2002. Orden del Día, Consejo General, Sesión Especial. December 18. http://www.ife.org.mx Accessed July 20, 2004.
Instituto Federal Electoral (IFE). 2003a. Orden del Día, Consejo General, Sesión Especial. April 18. Accessed August 20, 2003.
Instituto Federal Electoral (IFE). 2003b. Orden del Día, Consejo General, Sesión Especial. May 3. Accessed August 20, 2003.
Instituto Federal Electoral (IFE). 2004. Codigo Federal de Instituciones y Procedimientos Electorales (Cofipe). http:transparencia.ife.org.mxdocsmarco-normativoleyesCOFIPE.pdf Accessed August 31, 2004.
International IDEA. 2004. Global Database of Quotas for Women. Idea International and Stockholm University. http://www.idea.intquotaindex.cfm Accessed September 15, 2004.
International IDEA. 2006. Global Database of Quotas for Women. International Idea and Stockholm University. http://www.quotaproject.org Accessed April 26, 2006.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 2004. Women in National Parliaments. Available from http://www.ipu.orgwmn-eclassif.htm Accessed September 15, 2004.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 2006. Women in National Parliaments. http://www.ipu.org Accessed April 27, 2006.
Jenson, Jane, and Valiente, Celia. 2003. Comparing Two Movements for Gender Parity: France and Spain. In Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State, ed. Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen and Rucht, Dieter. New York: Cambridge University Press. 6993.
Jones, Mark P. 1996. Increasing Women's Representation via Gender Quotas: the Argentine Ley de Cupos. Women and Politics 16, 4: 75–97.
Jones, Mark P. 1998. Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Lessons from the Argentine Provinces. Comparative Political Studies 31, 1: 3–21.
Jones, Mark P. 2004. Quota Legislation and the Election of Women: Learning from the Costa Rican Experience. Journal of Politics 66, 4: 1203–23.
Jones, Mark P., and Navia, Patricio. 1999. Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Assessing the Effectiveness of Quotas in Open List Proportional Electoral Systems. Social Science Quarterly 80, 2: 341–55.
Klesner, Joseph L. 2004. The Structure of the Mexican Electorate: Social, Attitudinal, and Partisan Bases of Vincente Fox's Victory. In Domínguez and Lawson 2004. 91–122.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2003. Candidate Gender Quotas: a Framework for Analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 28–31.
Langston, Joy. 2001. Why Rules Matter: Changes in Candidate Selection in Mexico's Pri, 1988–2000. Journal of Latin American Studies 33, 3: 485–512.
Langston, Joy. 2003. Rising from the Ashes? Reorganizing and Unifying the Pri's State Party Organizations after Electoral Defeat. Comparative Political Studies 36, 3: 293–318.
Langston, Joy. 2006. The Changing Party of the Institutional Revolution: Electoral Competition and Decentralized Candidate Selection. Party Politics 12, 3: 395–413.
Lara, Rivera, Alberto, Jorge. 2006. La organización y los procesos en el Partido Acción Nacional. In Partidos políticos: democracia interna y financiamiento de precampañas. Memoria del VII Congreso Iberoamericano de Derecho Constitucional, ed. del Pilar Hernández, María. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM. http://www.bibliojuridica.orglibros134712.pdf Accessed April 26, 2006.
Loaeza, Soledad. 1999. El Partido Acción Nacional, la larga marcha, 1939–1994. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Maya, Rafael. 2003a. Avalan mujeres del Pri seleccíon de candidatos. Cimacnoticias.com, May 5.
Maya, Rafael. 2003b. Nuevamente excluida la mujer en las candidaturas. Cimacnoticias.com, April 29.
Maya, Rafael. 2003c. Paridad representativa, compromiso del Parlamento de Mujeres. Cimacnoticias.com, March 14.
Maya, Rafael. 2003d. Resistencia en el Pri, Pan y Prd a cuota de género. Cimacnoticias.com, March 11.
McCann, James. 2004. Primary Priming. In Domínguez and Lawson 2004. 157–86.
McElroy, Wendy. 2001. Boss Tweed Feminism. ifeminists. http://www.wendymcelroy.comifeminists20011211.html Accessed April 25, 2006.
Ochoa, Jorge Octavio. 2003. Exigen mujeres militantes sus derechos políticos. El Universal (Mexico City), March 6.
Peschard, Jacqueline. 2002. The Quota System in Latin America: General Panorama. Women in Parliament: beyond Numbers. Accessed August 8, 2004. http://www.idea.intpublicationswipindex.cfm.
Peschard, Jacqueline. 2006. Control over Party and Campaign Finance in Mexico. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 22, 1: 83–106.
Peschard, Jacqueline. 2003. Ife Councilor. Author interview. Mexico City, May 28.
Peschard-Sverdrup, Armand. 2003. Mexico Alert: July 6, 2003, Midterm Elections Preelection Analysis. Hemisphere Focus 2003. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies. http://www.ciaonet.orgpbeicsishem20032003_0703 Accessed April 20, 2004.
Poiré, Alejandro. 2002. Bounded Ambitions. Party Nominations, Discipline, and Defection: Mexico's Pri in Comparative Perspective. Ph.D. diss., Department of Government, Harvard University.
República de México. Honorable Cámara de Diputados. 2006. Lista de diputados por grupos parlamentario. http:sitl.diputados.gob.mxalbum_comisionesinfo_diputados.asp Accessed July 13, 2006.
Rodríguez, Victoria E. 1998. Women's Participation in Mexican Political Life. Boulder: Westview Press.
Rodríguez, Victoria E. 2003. Women in Contemporary Mexican Politics. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Sansores, Aurora. 2006. Acata Pri estatuto y otorga mitad de “suplencias” a mujeres. Cimacnoticias.com. http:cimacnoticias.comnoticias06mar06032204.html Accessed April 28, 2006.
Schmidt, Gregory D., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2004. Effective Quotas, Relative Party Magnitude, and the Success of Female Candidates: Peruvian Municipal Elections in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies 37, 6: 704–34.
Starr, Pamela K. 2003. The Mexican mid-Term Elections. Focalpoint: Spotlight on the Americas. http://www.focal.ca Accessed July 27, 2003.
Stevenson, Linda S. 1999. Gender Politics in the Mexican Democratization Process: Electing Women and Legislating Sex Crimes and Affirmative Action, 1988–97. In Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections, and Public Opinion, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Poiré, Alejandro. New York: Routledge. 5787.
Stevenson, Linda S. 2000. Gender Politics and Policy Process in Mexico, 1968–2000: Symbolic Gains for Women in an Emerging Democracy. Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh.
Stevenson, Linda S. 2001. Gender Politics and Policy Process in Mexico, 1974–2001. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 29-September 2.
Woldenberg, José. 1999. Mujeres y elecciones: el nuevo clima de la participación. Debate Feminista año 10, vol. 19 (April).
Wuhs, Steven T. 2006. Democratization and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection Rule Change in Mexico, 1991–2003. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 22, 1: 33–56.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Primaries vs. Quotas: Gender and Candidate Nominations in Mexico, 2003

  • Lisa Baldez (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.