Skip to main content Accessibility help

Do Conditional Cash Transfers Empower Women? Insights from Brazil’s Bolsa Família

  • Natasha Borges Sugiyama (a1) and Wendy Hunter (a2)


Conditional cash transfer programs (CCTs) have emerged as an important social welfare innovation across the Global South in the last two decades. That poor mothers are typically the primary recipients of the grants renders easy, but not necessarily correct, the notion that CCTs empower women. This article assesses the relationship between the world’s largest CCT, Brazil’s Bolsa Família, and women’s empowerment. To systematize and interpret existing research, including our own, it puts forth a three-part framework that examines the program’s effects on economic independence, physical health, and psychosocial well-being. Findings suggest that women experience some improved status along all three dimensions, but that improvements are far from universal. A core conclusion is that the broader institutional context in which the Bolsa Família is embedded—that is, ancillary services in health and social assistance—is crucial for conditioning the degree of empowerment obtained.


Corresponding author


Hide All

Conflict of interest: Natasha Borges Sugiyama and Wendy Hunter declare none.



Hide All
Ahmed, Saifuddin, Li, Qinfeng, Liu, Li, and Amy, O Tsui. 2012. Maternal Deaths Averted by Contraceptive Use: An Analysis of 172 Countries. Lancet 380: 111–25.
Alves, Flávia Jôse Oliveira, Machado, Daiane Borges, and Mauricio, L. Barreto. 2019. Effect of the Brazilian Cash Transfer Programme on Suicide Rates: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Brazilian Municipalities. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 54, 5: 599606.
Ambler, Kate, and de Brauw, Alan. 2017. The Impacts of Cash Transfers on Women’s Empowerment: Learning from Pakistan’s BISP Program. Social Protection and Labor Discussion paper no. 1702. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Arnold, Catherine, Conway, Tim, and Greenslade, Matthew. 2011. Cash Transfers: A Literature Review. Department for International Development Policy Division Paper. London: UKAID, DFID.
Banerjee, Abhijit V., and Duflo, Esther. 2011. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. New York: PublicAffairs.
Barrientos, Armando, Debowicz, Darío, and Woolard, Ingrid. 2016. Heterogeneity in Bolsa Família Outcomes. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 62: 3340.
Bartholo, Leticia, Passos, Luana, and Fontoura, Natália. 2017. Bolsa Família, autonomia feminina e equidade de gênero: o que indicam as pesquisas nacionais? Discussion paper 2331. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.
Bispo, Ana Claudia Souza da Silva. 2009. Nurse, Programa Saúde da Família. Author interview. Pau Brasil, June 25.
Bradshaw, Sarah, Chant, Sylvia, and Linneker, Brian. 2019. Gender, Poverty and Anti-Poverty Policy: Cautions and Concerns in a Context of Multiple Feminisations and “Patriarchal Pushback.” In The Routledge Handbook of Latin American Development, ed. Cupples, Julie, Palomino-Schalsa, Marcela, and Prieto, Manuel. London: Routledge. 275–85.
Brandão, André, Da Dalt, Salete, and Gouvêa, Victor Hugo. 2007. Food and Nutrition Security Among Beneficiaries of the Bolsa Família Program. In Evaluation of MDS Policies and Programs—Results, vol. 2, ed. Vaitsman, Jeni and Paes-Sousa, Rômulo. Brasília: Ministry of Social Development.
Butto, Andrea. 2011. Director, Diretoria de Políticas para Mulheres Rurais (DPMR), Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário. Author interview. Brasília, July 1.
Camargo, Camila Fracaro, Curralero, Claudia Regina Baddini, Licio, Elaine Cristina, and Mostafa, Joana. 2013. Perfil socioeconômico dos beneficiarios do Programa Bolsa Família. In Bolsa Família, ed. Campello, Tereza and Neri, Marcelo Côrtes. Brasília: IPEA.
Campara, Jéssica Pulino, and Viera, Kelmara Mendes. 2016. Beneficiários do Programa Bolsa Família: relações com as finanças e impacto na satisfação global de vida. Nova Economia 26, 3: 9811006.
Center for Global Development and Microsave. 2017. Household Perception: Impact of Bhamashah on Digital Governance Reforms in Rajasthan. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional (CEDEPLAR) and Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social (MDS). 2007. Sumário executivo: avaliação de impacto do Programa Bolsa Família. Brasília: MDS.
Chant, Sylvia, and McIlwaine, Cahty. 2016. Cities, Slums and Gender in the Global South: Towards a Feminised Urban Future. New York: Routledge.
Cookson, Tara Patricia. 2018. Unjust Conditions: Women’s Work and the Hidden Cost of Cash Transfer Programs. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cordeiro, Gabriela. 2011. Coordinator, Programa Balção da Cidadania. Author interview. Jaboatão dos Guararapes, July 5.
Costa, Delaine M. 2008. Considerações sobre o Programa Bolsa Família: implicações para o empoderamento e a autonomia das mulheres. Rio de Janeiro: IBASE.
Costanzi, Rogério N., and Fagundes, Flavio. 2010. Perfil does beneficiários do Programa Bolsa Família. In Bolsa Família 2003–2010, ed. Castro, J.A. and Modesto, Luci. Brasília: IPEA. 249-70.
De Brauw, Alan, and Peterman, Amber. 2011. Can Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Maternal Health and Birth Outcomes?: Evidence from El Salvador’s Comunidades Solidarias Rurales. International Food Policy Research Institute Discussion Paper 01080. April. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
De Brauw, Alan, Daniel, O. Gilligan, Hoddinott, John, and Roy, Shalini. 2014. The Impact of Bolsa Família on Women’s Decisionmaking Power. World Development 59 (July): 487504.
De Brauw, Alan, Daniel, O. Gilligan, Hoddinott, John, and Roy, Shalini. 2015. Bolsa Família and Household Labor Supply. Economic Development and Cultural Change 63, 3: 423-57.
De la O, Ana Lorena. 2015. Crafting Policies to End Poverty in Latin America: The Quiet Transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Prefeitura, Dourados. Secretaria de Assistência Social. n.d. Assistência Social ministra palestras de combate ao suicídio.ência-social-ministra-palestras-de-combate-ao-suicidio
The Economist. 2018. Exclusive Access. Special Report: Financial Inclusion. May 3.
Fiszbein, Ariel, Schady, Norbert, Ferreira, Francisco H. G., et al. 2009. Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. World Bank PolicyResearch Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Fried, Brian. 2012. Distributive Politics and Conditional Cash Transfers: The Case of Brazil’s Bolsa Família. World Development 40, 5: 1042–53.
Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Garrido, Beatriz. 2014. Adviser, Assesoria Especial para a Modernização da Gestão, Ministério do Planejamento. Author interview. Brasília, May 26.
Gukovas, Renata, Muller, Miriam, Pereira, Ana Claudia, and Reimao, Maira Emy. 2016. A Snapshot of Gender in Brazil Today: Institutions, Outcomes, and a Closer Look at Racial and Geographic Differences. Washington, DC: World Bank, August.
Hagen-Zanker, Jessica, Pellerano, Luca, Bastagli, Francesca, Harmon, Luke, Barca, Valentina, Sturge, Georgina, Schmidt, Tanja, and Laing, Calvin. 2017. The Impact of Cash Transfers on Women and Girls: A Summary of the Evidence. ODI Briefing. London: Overseas Development Institute.
Handa, Sudhanshu, Peterman, Amber, Davis, Benjamin, and Stampini, Marco. 2009. Opening Up Pandora’s Box: The Effect of Gender Targeting and Conditionality on Household Spending Behavior in Mexico’s Progresa Program. World Development 37, 6: 1129–42.
Harris, Joseph. 2017. Achieving Access: Professional Movements and the Politics of Health Uni- versalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hawkins, Kate, and Edwards, Jenny, eds. 2014. Beyond 2015: Pathways to a Gender Just World. Conference report. Brighton: Pathways of Women’s Empowerment.
Horton, Lynn. 2018. Women and Microfinance in the Global South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunter, Wendy, and Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2014. Transforming Subjects into Citizens: Insights from Brazil’s Bolsa Família. Perspectives on Politics 12, 4 (December): 829–45.
Hunter, Wendy, and Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2018. Making the Newest Citizens: Achieving Universal Birth Registration in Contemporary Brazil. Journal of Development Studies 54, 6: 397412.
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). 2007. Promoting Gender Equality Through Gender Mainstreaming and Investing in Women’s Empowerment. Washington, DC: Gender and Diversity Unit, IDB.
Instituto Brasileiro de Análises Sociais e Econômicas (IBASE). 2008. Repercussoõs do Programa Bolsa Família na segurança alimentar e nutricional das Famílias beneficiadas. Rio de Janeiro: IBASE.
Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA). 2015. Data series: Analfabetos—pessoas 15 anos e mais—mulheres. Accessed December 12, 2018.
Kabeer, Nalia. 1999. Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment. Development and Change 30, 3: 435–64.
Lavinas, Lena, Cobo, Barbara, and Veiga, Alinne. 2012. Bolsa Família: impacto das transferências de renda sobre a autonomia das mulheres pobres e as relações de gênero. Revista Latinoamericana de Población 6, 10: 3156.
Layton, Matthew. 2018. Bolsa Família: Historical, Popular, and Electoral Perspectives. In Routledge Handbook of Brazilian Politics, ed. Ames, Barry. New York: Routledge. 470–89.
Leonardes, Leila. 2014. Director, Coordenadoria Nacional da Secretaria Especial dos Direitos Humano, Ministério da Justiça. Author interview. Brasília, May 26.
Levy, Jack S. 2008. Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Interference. Conflict Management and Peace Science 25, 1: 118.
Lindert, Kathy, Linder, Anja, Hobbs, Jason, and de la Brière, Bénédicte. 2007. The Nuts and Bolts of Brazil’s Bolsa Família Program: Implementing Conditional Cash Transfers in a Decentralized Context. Social Policy Discussion Paper 709. Washington, DC: World Bank.ília-program-implementing-conditional-cash-transfers-in-a-decentralized-context
Machado, Daiane Borges, Laura, C. Rodrigues, Rasella, Davide, Barreto, Mauricio Lima, and Araya, Ricardo. 2018. Conditional Cash Transfer Programme: Impact on Homicide Rates and Hospitalizations from Violence in Brazil. PLoS ONE, 13, 12 (December 31).
Mahmud, Simeen. 2003. Actually How Empowering Is Microcredit? Development and Change 34, 4: 577605.
Martínez-Franzoni, Juliana, and Voorend, Koen. 2012. Blacks, Whites, or Grays? Conditional Transfers and Gender Equality in Latin America. Social Politics 19, 3: 383407.
McGuire, James W. 2010. Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário (MDA). n.d. Ter documento é um directo. Toda mulher quer respeito. Programa Nacional de Documentação da Trabalhadora Rural, 2008–2010. Brasília: MDA.
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social (MDS). 2006. Bolsa Família. Brasília: MDS.
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social (MDS). 2012. Sumário executivo: avaliação de impacto do Programa Bolsa Família, 2a. Rodada (AIBF II). Brasília: MDS.
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social (MDS). 2014. Censo SUAS 2014.
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social (MDS). 2015. Centro de Referencia da Assistência Social (CRAS). June 22.ência-social/unidades-de-atendimento/cras
Modesto, Lucia. 2011. Special Adviser to the Minister, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social. Author interview. Brasília, July 1.
Molyneux, Maxine. 2006. Mothers at the Service of the New Poverty Agenda: Progresa/ Oportunidades, Mexico’s Conditional Transfer Programme. Social Policy and Administration 40, 4: 425–49.
Molyneux, Maxine, Jones, Nicola, and Samuels, Fiona. 2016. Can Cash Transfer Programmes Have “Transformative” Effects? Journal of Development Studies 52, 8: 1087–98.
Moreira, Nathalia Carvalho, Ferreira, Marco Aurélio Marques, de Freitas Carvalho Lima, Afonso Augusto Teixeira, and Ckagnazaroff, Ivan Beck. 2012. Empoderamento das mulheres beneficiárias do Programa Bolsa Família na percepção dos agentes dos Centros de Referência de Assistência Social. Revista de Administração Pública 46, 2: 403–23.
Morris, Saul S. 2010. Conditional Cash Transfer Programs and Health. In Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America, ed. Adato, Michelle and Hoddinott, John. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 212–30.
Moura, Antonia Rodriques. 2011. Nurse, Programa Saúde da Família. Author interview. Camaragibe, July 17.
Município de Santa Isabel. 2018. CRAS promove palestra sobre depressão para cadastrados no Bolsa Família. September 3.ília/
Narayan, Deepa, Chambers, Robert, Shah, Meera K., and Petesch, Patti. 2000. Voices of the Poor: Crying Out for Change. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.
Narayan, Uma. 2002. Minds of Their Own: Choices, Autonomy, Cultural Practices, and Other Women. In A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, ed. Louise, M. Antony and Charlotte, E. Witt.Boulder: Westview Press. 418–32.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2005. Women’s Bodies: Violence, Security, Capabilities. Journal of Human Development 6: 167–83.
Pires, André. 2012. Family Income and Gender: Perceptions of the Family Aid Program. Cadernos de Pesquisa 42, 145: 130–61.
Pritchett, Regina K. 2011. Land Titling as Women’s Empowerment. Master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Rego, Walquiria Leão, and Pinzani, Alessandro. 2014. Vozes do Bolsa Família. São Paulo: Editora Universidade Estadual Paulista.
Ribas-Prado, Mariani da Costa, Calais, Sandra Leal, and Cardoso, Hugo Ferrari. 2016. Stress, depressão, e qualidade de vida em beneficiários de programas de transferência de renda. Interação Psicologia 20, 3: 330–40.
Sacchet, Teresa. 2014. Adviser and Coordinator of the Committee on Gender and Public Policy for Women, Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social. Author interview. Brasília, May 5.
Samuels, Fiona, and Stavropoulou, Maria. 2016. “Being Able to Breathe Again”: The Effects of Cash Transfer Programmes on Psychosocial Wellbeing. Journal of Development Studies 52, 8: 10991114.
Santos, Wanderley Guilherme dos. 1987. Cidadania e justiça. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus.
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
Smith-Ramani, Joanna, McKay, Katherine Lucas, and Mitchell, David. 2017. Income Volatility: Why It Destabilizes Working Families and How Philanthropy Can Make a Difference. December 17. Aspen: Aspen Institute.
Soares, Fábio Veras. 2011. Brazil’s Bolsa Família. Economic and Political Weekly 46, 21: 5560.
Solon, Avrairan Fabrícia Alves Caetano, Scott, Juliano Beck, de Sousa, Bunier Salles, de Lima, Larissa Maria, and de Oliveira, Isabel Fernandes. 2018. Saúde mental e assistência social: os desafios da psicologia no CRAS. Actas do 12° Congresso Nacional de Psicologia da Saúde. 147–55.
Suarez, Mireya, and Libardoni, Marlene. 2007. The Impact of the Bolsa Família Program: Changes and Continuities in the Social Status of Women. In Evaluation of MDSfPolicies and Programs—Results, ed. Vaitsman, Jeni and Paes-Souza, Rômulo. Brasília: SAGI/ MDS.
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2012. Diffusion of Good Government: Social Sector Reforms in Brazil. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges, and Hunter, Wendy. 2013. Whither Clientelism? Good Governance and Brazil’s Bolsa Família Program. Comparative Politics 46, 1: 4362.
Tendler, Judith. 1997. Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tepperman, Jonathan. 2016. The Fix: How Nations Survive and Thrive in a World in Decline. New York: Tim Duggan Books.
Van Eerdewijk, Anouka, Wong, Franz, Vaast, Chloe, Newton, Julie, Tyszler, Marcelo, and Pennington, Amy. 2017. White Paper: A Conceptual Model of Women’s and Girls’ Empowerment. March. Amsterdam: KIT Royal Tropical Institute.
Wampler, Brian, Sugiyama, Natasha Borges, and Touchton, Michael. 2019. Democracy at Work: Pathways to Well-Being in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Westlund, Andrea C. 2009. Rethinking Relational Autonomy. Hypatia 24, 4: 2649.


Do Conditional Cash Transfers Empower Women? Insights from Brazil’s Bolsa Família

  • Natasha Borges Sugiyama (a1) and Wendy Hunter (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.