Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:58:19.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulation of laser–plasma interactions with atomic and radiation effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

R. Marchand
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G7Canada
R. Fedosejevs
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G7Canada
C. E. Capjack
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G7Canada
Y. T. Lee
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, California94550, USA.

Abstract

A one-dimensional Lagrangian code is used to model the interaction of laser light with plasma. The equation of state used is a realistic, piecewise analytic fit, which allows simulations starting from normal density and temperature conditions. The atomic physics required in the code (ionization, radiation rate, and opacities) is interpolated from tables generated using a non-LTE hydrogenic atom model. Radiation transport is treated approximately using a new, numerically efficient recursive algorithm. Results from numerical simulations are compared with recent X-ray measurements from Al, Ti, and Fe plasmas. The code is also used to investigate the X-ray conversion efficiency and the effect of radiation transport on the mass ablation rate and ablation pressure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apruzese, J. et al. 1980, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 23, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. F. 1967. Phys. Rev. 153, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. R. 1980 Rutherford & Appleton Laboratories Report R.L-80–091.Google Scholar
Birnboim, A. 1986. J. Comp. Phys. 63, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clementi, E. & Roettis, C. 1974, Nucl. Data Tables 14, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duston, D. et al. 1983, Phys. Rev. A 27, 1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbro, R., Max, C. & Fabre, E. 1985, Phys. Fluids 28, 1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedosejevs, R. et al. 1987, J. Phys. D.: Appl. Phys., 20, 1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. T. 1987, J. Quant. Spectr. Radiat. Transfer, 38, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, P. 1982, Phys. Fluids 25, 1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostacci, D. V. 1985, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Popil, R. et al. 1987, Phys. Rev. A, 35, 3874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L. Jr. 1956, The Physics of Fully Ionized Gases (Interscience, New York).Google Scholar