Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-prt4h Total loading time: 0.376 Render date: 2021-10-17T10:41:51.725Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Projectile energy dependence of L X-ray emission in collisions of Xe23+ with In target: role of Coulomb ionization and quasi-molecular effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Jieru Ren
Affiliation:
MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
Yongtao Zhao*
Affiliation:
MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
Wencai Ma
Affiliation:
MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
Xing Wang
Affiliation:
MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
Yu Liu
Affiliation:
MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
Pengfei Hu
Affiliation:
MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
Rui Cheng
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou730000, China
Xianming Zhou
Affiliation:
MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China Xianyang Normal University, Xianyang712000, China
Yuyu Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou730000, China
Yu Lei
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou730000, China
Yanhong Chen
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou730000, China
Guoqing Xiao
Affiliation:
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou730000, China
*
Author for correspondence: Y. Zhao, Xianning West Rd. 28, Xi'an 710049, China. E-mail: zhaoyongtao@xjtu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The X-ray emissions in the interaction of 3–6 MeV Xe23+ ions into thick solid In target are measured. The projectile-to-target and target Lα/Lβ X-ray production intensity ratios are observed to strongly depend on the projectile energy. The dependence deviates from Coulomb ionization predictions, which implies the important roles of coupling between subshells and the activation of 4fσ rotational couplings for projectile energy larger than 5 MeV.

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

The study of X-ray emissions induced from highly charged ion-atom collisions attracts continuous attentions (Kavanagh et al., Reference Kavanagh, Cunningham, Der, Fortner, Khan, Zaharis and Garcia1970; Datz et al., Reference Datz, Moak, Appleton and Carlson1971; Lutz et al., Reference Lutz, Stein, Datz and Moak1972; Anholt et al., Reference Anholt, Meyerhof, Stoller, Morenzoni, Andriamonje, Molitoris, Baker, Hoffmann, Bowman, Xu, Xu, Frankel, Murphy, Crowe and Rasmussen1984; Schonfeldt et al., Reference Schönfeldt, Mokler, Hoffmann and Warczak1985, Reference Schönfeldt, Mokler, Hoffmann and Warczak1986; Watson et al., Reference Watson, Blackadar and Horvat1999, Reference Watson, Peng, Horvat and Perumal2006, Reference Watson, Horvat and Peng2008; Horvat et al., Reference Horvat, Watson and Peng2009; Ren et al., Reference Ren, Zhao, Zhou, Wang, Lei, Xu, Cheng, Wang, Liu, Sun and Xiao2015), since it is one of the most efficient ways to probe the inner-shell ionization/excitation mechanisms and helps to provide basic data for various fields such as atomic physics (Mokler and Folkmann, Reference Mokler and Folkmann1978), plasma physics (Bitter et al., Reference Bitter, Hsuan, Bush, Cohen, Cummings, Grek, Hill, Schivell, Zarnstorff, Beiersdorfer, Osterheld, Smith and Fraenkel1993; Hill et al., Reference Hill, Scott, Bell, Budny, Bush, Clark, Denne-Hinnov, Ernst, Hammett, Mikkelsen, Mueller, Ongena, Park, Ramsey, Synakowski, Taylor and Zarnstorff1999; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Beiersdorfer, Fournier and Träbert2002), and astrophysics. It has been found that for collisions either in a high energy region (v p ≫ v e, where v p and v e are velocities of projectile and involved target orbit electrons, respectively) or Z p ≪ Z t (where Z p and Z t are atomic number of projectile and target, respectively), the Coulomb ionization dominates the vacancy production process (Garcia et al., Reference Garcia, Fortner and Kavanagh1973; McGuire and Richard, Reference McGuire and Richard1973). In the past decades, numerous theoretical formula has been formed to calculate the ionization cross section, such as classical binary-encounter approximation (BEA) (Gryzinski, Reference Gryzinski1965), plane-wave Born approximation (PWBA) (Johnson et al., Reference Johnson, Basbas and McDaniel1979), and ECPSSR (Brandt and Lapicki, Reference Brandt and Lapicki1981), which complements the influence of projectile energy loss, Coulomb deflection, target ionization within the perturbed stationary state, and relativistic corrections to electrons. In an intermediate energy region (v p ~ v e), molecular effects become important (Barat and Lichten, Reference Barat and Lichten1972; Eichler et al., Reference Eichler, Wille, Fastrup and Taulbjerg1976). Namely, when the collision partners approach each other, they do form quasi-molecular orbits, from which the electrons are ionized/excited through direct ionization or rotational coupling. On the outgoing way, the vacancies are shared between the collision partners through radial coupling. The occurrence of molecular effects actually require appropriate incident energies that, on the one hand, are high enough to allow the collision partners approaching each other and, on the other hand, low enough to ensure the interaction timescale for the molecular orbit formation. The dominant role of molecular effects in incident energy range of 0.1–10 MeV/u has been reported in a series of papers (Meyerhof et al., Reference Meyerhof, Anholt, Saylor, Lazarus, Little and Chase1976, Reference Meyerhof, Anholt and Saylor1977, Reference Meyerhof, Rüetschi, Stoller, Stockli and Wölfli1979; Anholt and Meyerhof, Reference Anholt and Meyerhof1977). However, for collisions with lower incident energies, experimental data are limited.

The inner-shell processes involving L-shell are more complicated than K-shell cases and are currently far to be fully understood. Previous studies show that for highly charged ion-atom collisions in the intermediate energy region, the total L X-ray emission intensity of projectile present obvious peak structures versus target atomic number, which can be qualitatively explained by molecular effects near the level-matching region (Kavanagh et al., Reference Kavanagh, Cunningham, Der, Fortner, Khan, Zaharis and Garcia1970; Kubo et al., Reference Kubo, Jundt and Purser1973; Woods et al., Reference Woods, Hopkins, Kauffman Robert, Elliott, Jamison and Richard1973; Meyerhof et al., Reference Meyerhof, Anholt and Saylor1977; Ren et al., Reference Ren, Zhao, Zhou, Cheng, Lei, Sun, Wang, Xu, Wang, Liu, Yu, Li, Zhang, Xu and Xiao2013). However, the L α/L β intensity ratio variation is still not fully interpreted (Datz et al., Reference Datz, Moak, Appleton and Carlson1971; Meyerhof et al., Reference Meyerhof, Anholt and Saylor1977; Genz et al., Reference Genz, Hoffmann, Löw and Richter1979; Saha Amal et al., Reference Saha Amal, Dhal, Thulasi Ram, Padhi, Kurup, Prasad and Tandon1998a, Reference Saha Amal, Dhal, Tiwari, Kurup, Padhi, Prasad and Tandon1998b), especially its dependence on the incident energy. Meyerhof et al. (Reference Meyerhof, Anholt and Saylor1977) systematically investigated the L α/L β intensity ratio as a function of incident energy and target atomic number in collisions of highly charged ions with various solid targets. In the framework of radial coupling between molecular orbits, the variation in the L α/L β intensity ratio is explained by the molecular orbital correlation shift from the BL (Barat and Lichten) to Eichler rule as the asymmetry of the collision system increases. Saha Amal et al. (Reference Saha Amal, Dhal, Thulasi Ram, Padhi, Kurup, Prasad and Tandon1998a, Reference Saha Amal, Dhal, Tiwari, Kurup, Padhi, Prasad and Tandon1998b) measured the L X-ray emissions in collision of tens of MeV highly charged ions with thin solid target later. Combining the data from Datz et al. (Reference Datz, Moak, Appleton and Carlson1971), the L α/L β intensity ratio of iodine ions over a large incident energy range of 6–180 MeV are studied. It is found that as the asymmetry of the collision system increases, the molecular orbital correlation rule shift theories cannot even qualitatively reproduce the experimental results at low impact energies.

To extend the experimental data availability and investigate the inner-shell ionization/excitation mechanism, we measured the X-ray emissions in interaction of highly charged Xe ions with the solid target in energy range of several MeV. Here, we report about the L X-ray emissions induced in Xe + In collision systems. The relative intensity of target-to-projectile L X rays and the target L α/L β intensity ratio as a function of projectile energy are investigated. The results are examined in terms of direct ionization and molecular orbital couplings, whose relative roles are discussed.

The experiment was performed at the 320 kV high-voltage platform at the Institute of Modern Physics (IMP) in Lanzhou. Highly charged ions were generated from electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) ion source and directed by two quadrupole lenses to the target chamber after momentum analysis in a 90° bending magnet. The pressure in the target chamber was kept below 10−10 mbar. The highly charged ions impact perpendicularly onto the target. The X rays were detected at 45° with respect to the incident beam line by a silicon drifted detector, which has a resolution of 136 eV full-width at half-maximum at X-ray energy of 5.9 keV. The number of incident ions on the target was monitored temperally with a calibrated transmitting Faraday cup. More experimental details can be found in Zhou et al. (Reference Zhou, Cheng, Zhao, Wang, Lei, Chen, Ma and Xiao2019).

The typical X-ray spectra induced by 6 MeV Xe23+ impacting on In target is shown in Figure 1. Xe Lι X rays overlap with In Lβ2,15 lines and the relative intensities are extracted according to the well-resolved lines. It was reported that in highly charged ion-atom collisions, the Lι/Lα intensity ratio shows no big difference over a large range of target atomic number and changes only slightly with the incident energy. Therefore, here we use the reported data concerning 15–60 MeV iodine ions interacting with various solid target, in which Lι/Lα is about 0.07, to extract the Xe Lι X-ray intensity. Consequently, the intensity of In Lβ2,15 can be obtained as well.

Fig. 1. Typical spectra induced by Xe23+ impacting on In target.

The X-ray spectra induced by 3–6 MeV Xe23+ impacting on In target is shown in Figure 2. The structures of the spectra exhibit strong dependence on the projectile energy. The projectile-to-target L X-ray yield ratio is shown in Figure 3a as a function of incident energy. The uncertainty of about 5% mainly comes from the intensity determination from the area of Gauss fitting profiles. It can be seen that in the incident energy range of 3–5 MeV, the projectile-to-target L X-ray yield ratios keep nearly constant and are significantly reduced when the incident energy is increased from 5 to 6 MeV.

Fig. 2. X-ray spectra induced by 3, 4, 5, and 6 MeV Xe23+ impacting on In target.

Fig. 3. (a) Projectile-to-target L X-ray yield ratio in collision of Xe23+ with In target. (b) The theoretical predictions of the projectile-to-target L-vacancy production cross-section ratios based on the vacancy sharing model as well as the BEA.

The projectile-to-target L-vacancy production cross sections are calculated by the well-known BEA function developed by Gryzinski (Reference Gryzinski1965) as well as the vacancy sharing model formulated by Meyerhof et al. (Reference Meyerhof, Anholt and Saylor1977). In the vacancy sharing model, the In L 1 electrons are promoted through 4fσ molecular orbit (MO), and on the outgoing part of the collision, the vacancies are shared by the nearby levels such as In L 2, In L 3, Xe L 1, Xe L 2, and Xe L 3. If we do not differentiate the subshells, the overall projectile-to-target L-vacancy production cross-section ratio σXe-LIn-L can be simplified as ωL/(1 − ωL):

(1)$${\rm \omega}_L/\lpar 1-{\rm \omega}_L\rpar = \exp\lpar -2{\rm \lambda}_L\rpar \comma \quad 2{\rm \lambda}_L={\pi\vert \sqrt{I_{{\rm Xe}}}-\sqrt{I_{{\rm In}}} \vert\over \sqrt{{1 \over 2}mv_{\rm p}^2}},$$

where ωL and 1 − ωL are the total vacancy sharing ratio of Xe L- and In L-shell from 4fσ orbit, respectively, I Xe and I In are the binding energy of Xe and In L-shell, respectively, m is the electron mass, and v p is the projectile velocity.

As shown in Figure 3b, the vacancy sharing model predictions of Xe L/In L-vacancy production cross-section ratios are the orders of magnitude lower than the BEA result, and the predicted increasing trend disagrees with the measurement. Therefore, we conclude that the vacancy sharing contribution of 4fσ MO to Xe L-shell can be neglected. The BEA formula, which describes the Coulomb ionization process, predicts a constant projectile-to-target L-vacancy production cross-section ratio. This corresponds to the constant X-ray emission intensity ratio neglecting the variation of the fluorescence yield in the incident energy region. Therefore, the observed nearly constant projectile-to-target L X-ray intensity ratio for incident energy smaller than 5 MeV can be qualitatively explained by the Coulomb ionization process.

As for the observed ratio reduction for incident energy larger than 5 MeV, we attribute it to the activation of rotational coupling of 4fσ orbit. Unlike vacancy sharing, which happens at the large and wide range of internuclear distance, rotational coupling mostly occurs at much smaller internuclear distances; therefore, sufficient incident energy is needed to trigger this process. Since 4fσ MO correlates to the In L 1 shell, the triggering of this process greatly increases the In L-shell vacancy production cross section. Consequently, the reduced Xe/In L X-ray intensity ratio is expected. The experimental data indicated that the threshold of 4fσ MO rotational coupling process in the Xe and In collision system is about 5 MeV.

The Lα/Lβ1,3,4 intensity ratio of In target is observed to increase obviously with the incident energy, as shown in Figure 4. Since Coulomb ionization theory predicts a constant ratio, the results indicate the importance of the relationship between the subshells. As discussed above, the vacancies generated through 4fσ MO, which correlates to the In L 1 shell, are shared by In L 2 and In L 3 shells, when reasonably neglecting the sharing process of Xe L shells. Namely, the vacancy production cross sections of In subshells could be described as below:

(2)$${\rm \sigma}_{L3}={\rm \omega \sigma}_{4f\,{\rm \sigma}}\comma \quad {\rm \sigma}_{L_1+L_2} =\lpar 1-{\rm \omega}\rpar {\rm \sigma}_{4f\,{\rm \sigma}},$$

where ${\rm \sigma }_{L_3}$ is the vacancy production cross section of the In L 3 shell, ${\rm \sigma }_{L_1+L_2}$ is the sum of vacancy production cross sections of In L 1 and In L 2 shells, and ω is the vacancy sharing probability from 4fσ MO to In L 3 shell. The vacancy production cross-section ratio of the In L 3 shell to In L 1 + L 2 shells can be simplified as ω/(1 − ω), which is formulated to increase with the incident energy. In view of the fact that the Lα lines emit from the electron transition to L 3 vacancies, and Lβ1,3,4 lines from the electron transition to In L 1 and In L 2 vacancies, increasing Lα/Lβ1,3,4 intensity ratios are expected consequently. The experimental results can be qualitatively explained by the vacancy sharing model. On the other hand, the agreement validates Meyerhof's proposal that the molecular orbital correlation relationship tend to obey Eichler rule for asymmetric collision.

Fig. 4. In Lα/Lβ1,3,4 intensity ratio as a function of projectile energy in collision of Xe23+ with In target.

In summary, the X-ray emission induced in interaction of Xe23+ with solid In target is measured. It is found that the projectile-to-target L X-ray intensity ratio keeps nearly constant in the incident energy region of 2–5 MeV, which could be well explained by Coulomb ionization theory. When the incident energy is larger than 5 MeV, the projectile-to-target L X-ray intensity ratio is greatly reduced due to the activation of rotational coupling process of 4fσ MO, which correlates to the In L-shell. The incident energy-dependence Lα/Lβ1,3,4 intensity ratio shows the importance of vacancy sharing between L subshells and validated Meyerhof's proposal that the 4fσ MO tends to correlates to L 1 subshell for asymmetric collisions.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the staff from 320 kV high-voltage platform at the Institute of Modern Physics (IMP) for providing the highly charged ion beams. The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 11705141 and 11775282), the National Key Research and Development Project No. 2019YFA0404900, and the Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (Grant No. 2017M623145).

References

Anholt, R and Meyerhof, WE (1977) K-vacancy production in heavy-ion collisions. III. 1sσ excitation. Physical Review A 16, 190.10.1103/PhysRevA.16.190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anholt, R, Meyerhof, WE, Stoller, Ch, Morenzoni, E, Andriamonje, SA, Molitoris, JD, Baker, OK, Hoffmann, DHH, Bowman, H, Xu, JS, Xu, ZZ, Frankel, K, Murphy, D, Crowe, K and Rasmussen, JO (1984) Atomic collisions with relativistic heavy ions: target inner-shell ionization. Physical Review A 30, 22342244.10.1103/PhysRevA.30.2234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barat, M and Lichten, W (1972) Extension of the electron-promotion model to asymmetric atomic collisions. Physical Review A 6, 211.10.1103/PhysRevA.6.211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitter, M, Hsuan, H, Bush, C, Cohen, S, Cummings, CJ, Grek, B, Hill, KW, Schivell, J, Zarnstorff, M, Beiersdorfer, P, Osterheld, A, Smith, A and Fraenkel, B (1993) Spectra of heliumlike krypton from Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor plasmas. Physical Review Letters 71, 1007.10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandt, W and Lapicki, G (1981) Energy-loss effect in inner-shell Coulomb ionization by heavy charged particles. Physical Review A 23, 17171729.10.1103/PhysRevA.23.1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H, Beiersdorfer, P, Fournier, KB and Träbert, E (2002) Soft-x-ray spectra of highly charged Kr ions in an electron beam ion trap. Physical Review E 65, 056401.10.1103/PhysRevE.65.056401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datz, S, Moak, CD, Appleton, BR and Carlson, TA (1971) Differentiation in L-subshell vacancy production in iodine ions by atomic collisions at 15–60 MeV. Physical Review Letters 27, 363366.10.1103/PhysRevLett.27.363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichler, J, Wille, U, Fastrup, B and Taulbjerg, K (1976) Systematic investigation of diabatic correlations. Physical Review A 14, 707.10.1103/PhysRevA.14.707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, JD, Fortner, RJ and Kavanagh, TM (1973) Inner-shell vacancy production in ion-atom collisions. Reviews of Modern Physics 45, 111.10.1103/RevModPhys.45.111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genz, H, Hoffmann, DHH, Löw, W and Richter, A (1979) L-shell ionization by relativistic electrons and energy dependence of the Lβ/Lα branching ratio. Physics Letters A 73, 313315.10.1016/0375-9601(79)90543-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gryzinski, M (1965) Classical theory of atomic collisions. I. Theory of inelastic collisions. Physical Review A 2A, 336358.10.1103/PhysRev.138.A336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, KW, Scott, SD, Bell, M, Budny, R, Bush, CE, Clark, REH, Denne-Hinnov, B, Ernst, DR, Hammett, GW, Mikkelsen, DR, Mueller, D, Ongena, J, Park, HK, Ramsey, AT, Synakowski, EJ, Taylor, G and Zarnstorff, MC and the TFTR Group (1999) Tests of local transport theory and reduced wall impurity influx with highly radiative plasmas in the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor. Physics of Plasmas 6, 877.10.1063/1.873327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvat, V, Watson, RL and Peng, Y (2009) Kα satellite and hypersatellite distributions of Ar exrefd in heavy-ion collisions. Physical Review A 79, 012708.10.1103/PhysRevA.79.012708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, DE, Basbas, G and McDaniel, FD (1979) Nonrelativistic plane-wave Born-approximation calculations of direct Coulomb M-subshell ionization by charged particles. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 24, 111.10.1016/0092-640X(79)90036-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, TM, Cunningham, ME, Der, RC, Fortner, RJ, Khan, JM, Zaharis, EJ and Garcia, JD (1970) X-ray production in ion-atom collisions: the influence of level matching. Physical Review Letters 25, 14731475.10.1103/PhysRevLett.25.1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubo, H, Jundt, FC and Purser, KH (1973) Target Z dependence of projectile Kα x-ray production cross sections in high-energy, heavy-ion-atom collisions. Physical Review Letters 31, 674677.10.1103/PhysRevLett.31.674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, HO, Stein, J, Datz, S and Moak, CD (1972) Collisional x-ray excitation in solid and gaseous targets by heavy-ion bombardment. Physical Review Letters 28, 810.10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, JH and Richard, P (1973) Procedure for computing cross sections for single and multiple ionization of atoms in the binary-encounter approximation by the impact of heavy charged particles. Physical Review A 8, 1374.10.1103/PhysRevA.8.1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhof, WE, Anholt, R, Saylor, TK, Lazarus, SM, Little, A and Chase, LF (1976) K-vacancy production in heavy-ion collisions. I. Experimental results for Z ≥ 35 projectiles. Physical Review A 14, 1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhof, WE, Anholt, R and Saylor, TK (1977) K-vacancy production in heavy-ion collisions. II. Multiple- and single-collision excitation in the 2pσ molecular orbital. Physical Review A 16, 169.10.1103/PhysRevA.16.169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhof, WE, Rüetschi, A, Stoller, C, Stockli, M and Wölfli, W (1979) L-vacancy production in near-symmetric heavy-ion collision (Z ≥ 35). Physical Review A 20, 154.10.1103/PhysRevA.20.154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokler, PH and Folkmann, F (1978) X-ray production in heavy ion-atom collisions. In Sellin IA (ed.), Structure and Collisions of Ions and Atoms. Topics in Current Physics, vol. 5. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-81210-1_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, J, Zhao, Y, Zhou, X, Cheng, R, Lei, Y, Sun, Y, Wang, X, Xu, G, Wang, Y, Liu, S, Yu, Y, Li, Y, Zhang, X, Xu, Z and Xiao, G (2013) Target Z dependence of Xe L x-ray emission in heavy ion-atom collision near the Bohr velocity: influence of level matching. Physica Scripta T156, 014036.10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T156/014036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, J, Zhao, Y, Zhou, X, Wang, X, Lei, Y, Xu, G, Cheng, R, Wang, Y, Liu, S, Sun, Y and Xiao, G (2015) Charge-state dependence of inner-shell processes in collisions between highly charged Xe ions and solids at intermediate energies. Physical Review A 92, 062710.10.1103/PhysRevA.92.062710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saha Amal, K, Dhal, BB, Thulasi Ram, KV, Padhi, HC, Kurup, MB, Prasad, KG and Tandon, PN (1998 a) L x-rays from 64 MeV iodine projectiles in collision with various gas targets. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 31, 17711779.10.1088/0953-4075/31/8/026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saha Amal, K, Dhal, BB, Tiwari, U, Kurup, MB, Padhi, HC, Prasad, KG and Tandon, PN (1998 b) Periodic variation in the I- and Ag-projectile Lβ1 – to – Lα x-ray intensity ratio with the target atomic number. Physical Review A 57, 44134419.10.1103/PhysRevA.57.4413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönfeldt, WA, Mokler, PH, Hoffmann, DHH and Warczak, A (1985) Resonant electron transfer and L-shell excitation at 3.6 MeV/u 62Smq+ → Xe collisions. Zeitschrift für Physik A Atoms and Nuclei 321, 693694.10.1007/BF01432447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönfeldt, WA, Mokler, PH, Hoffmann, DHH and Warczak, A (1986) Resonant electron transfer and L-shell excitation at 3.6 MeV/u 62Smq+ → Xe collisions, q = 34 − 52. Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters 4, 161176.10.1007/BF01437354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, RL, Blackadar, JM and Horvat, V (1999) Projectile Z dependence of Cu K-shell vacancy production in 10-MeV/amu ion-solid collisions. Physical Review A 60, 29592969.10.1103/PhysRevA.60.2959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, RL, Peng, Y, Horvat, V and Perumal, AN (2006) Target K-vacancy production by 2.5 to 25 MeV/amu Ar, Kr, and Xe ions. Physical Review A 74, 062709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, RL, Horvat, V and Peng, Y (2008) Kα x-ray satellite and hypersatellite spectra of vanadium metal and oxides exrefd in heavy-ion collisions. Physical Review A 78, 062702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, CW, Hopkins, Forrest, Kauffman Robert, L, Elliott, DO, Jamison, KA and Richard, Patrick (1973) Anomalous target Z dependence of double to single K-shell vacancy production in Cl-beam X rays. Physical Review Letters 31, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X, Cheng, R, Zhao, Y, Wang, Y, Lei, Y, Chen, Y, Ma, X and Xiao, G (2019) Multiple ionization state of Arq+ ions during collisions near the Bohr velocity. Scientific Reports 9, 5359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Typical spectra induced by Xe23+ impacting on In target.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. X-ray spectra induced by 3, 4, 5, and 6 MeV Xe23+ impacting on In target.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) Projectile-to-target L X-ray yield ratio in collision of Xe23+ with In target. (b) The theoretical predictions of the projectile-to-target L-vacancy production cross-section ratios based on the vacancy sharing model as well as the BEA.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. In Lα/Lβ1,3,4 intensity ratio as a function of projectile energy in collision of Xe23+ with In target.

You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Projectile energy dependence of L X-ray emission in collisions of Xe23+ with In target: role of Coulomb ionization and quasi-molecular effects
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Projectile energy dependence of L X-ray emission in collisions of Xe23+ with In target: role of Coulomb ionization and quasi-molecular effects
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Projectile energy dependence of L X-ray emission in collisions of Xe23+ with In target: role of Coulomb ionization and quasi-molecular effects
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *