Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:37:01.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Over-volted breakdown and recovery of short nitrogen spark gaps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2010

Xinjing Cai ,
Xiaobin Zou ,
Xinxin Wang ,
Liming Wang ,
Zhicheng Guan  and
Weihua Jiang
Xinjing Cai
Affiliation:
Shenzhen Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China
Xiaobin Zou
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Power System, Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Xinxin Wang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Power System, Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Liming Wang
Affiliation:
Shenzhen Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China
Zhicheng Guan
Affiliation:
Shenzhen Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China
Weihua Jiang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Power System, Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Xinxin Wang, Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. E-mail: wangxx@tsinghua.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The characteristic of the over-volted breakdown and the gaseous recovery in short nitrogen gaps was experimentally studied. It was found that the breakdown voltage of the gap changes from shot to shot even with the same experimental conditions and obeys Gaussian distribution. The over-volted factor is reduced with an increasing pressure. With a 2.7-mm gap the over-volted factors are 4.53 for 0.1 MPa pressure and 1.74 for 0.4 MPa. The over-volted breakdown voltage depends individually on the gap spacing d and the gas pressure p, rather than on the product of pd. An empirical formula of the breakdown voltage as a function of p and d was derived. The time-dependent recovery of the breakdown voltage, RVb, was obtained using a two-pulse technique. The second breakdown voltage also obeys Gaussian distribution, but it is normally with a smaller standard deviation especially when the interpulse spacing of Δt is relatively short. As a whole, RVb rises with the increase of Δt. However, an intermediate plateau is always observed and it starts when the second breakdown voltage is a little bit higher than the static breakdown voltage of the gap. The first rising edge of the RVb curve corresponds to the recovery of the electro-neutrality and the density. The intermediate plateau and the following rising edge take the spark gap much longer time to recover. The processes governing these two latter phases are as yet not fully clear. It is attributed to the delayed recombination of the residual nitrogen atoms on the cathode to produce the initial electrons for the second breakdown. An increase in pressure has resulted in an upward shift of the intermediate plateau and a shortening in the recovery time of the gaps. The second spark generally does not follow the path of the first spark.

Keywords

Gas breakdownGaseous recoveryGas spark gap switch
Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 443 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chang, T.Y. (1973). Improved uniform-field electrode profiles for TEA laser and high-voltage applications. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 44, 405–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dakin, T.W., Luxa, G., Oppermann, G., Vigreux, I., Wind, G. & Winkelnkemper, H. (1974). Break-down of gases in uniform fields Paschen curves for nitrogen, air and sulfur hexafluoride. Electra 32, 61–82.Google Scholar
Frank, K., Stark, R., Christiansen, J., Felsner, P., Gortler, A., Hoffmann, D., Prucker, U., Schwandner, A., Stetter, M., Tkotz, R. & Urban, J. (1997). Spatial and time characteristics of high current, high voltage pseudospark discharges. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 25, 740–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, K., Dewald, E., Bickes, C., Ernst, U., Iberler, M., Prucker, U., Rainer, A., Schlaug, M., Schwab, J., Urban, J., Weisser, W. & Hoffmann, D. (1999). Scientific and technological progress of pseudospark devices. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 27, 1008–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, W.H., Yatsui, K., Takayama, K., Akemoto, M., Nakamura, E., Shimizu, N., Tokuchi, A., Rukin, S., Tarasenko, V. & Panchenko, A. (2004). Compact solid-state switched pulsed power and its applications. Proc. IEEE 92, 1180–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuai, B., Wu, G., Qiu, A., Wang, L., Cong, P. & Wang, X. (2009). Soft X-ray emissions from neon gas-puff Z-pinch powered by Qiang Guang-I accelerator. Laser Part. Beams 27, 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J.L., Yin, Y., Ge, B., Zhan, T.W., Chen, X.B., Feng, J.H., Shu, T., Zhang, J.D. & Wang, X.X. (2007). An electron-beam accelerator based on spiral water PFL. Laser Part. Beams 25, 593–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, R., Zou, X., Wang, X., Zeng, N. & He, L. (2008). X-ray emission from an X-pinch and its applications. Laser Part. Beams 26, 455–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, S.J., Tuema, F.A., Turnbull, S.M. & Farish, O. (1993). The operation of repetitive high-pressure spark gap switches. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 26, 954–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, S.J., Turnbull, S.M., Tuema, F.A. & Farish, O. (1997). Factors affecting and methods of improving the pulse repetition frequency of pulse-charged and DC-charged high-pressure gas switches. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 25, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzola, M.S., Molen, G.M. & Kuhlman, J.M. (1988). Recovery of a gas-blown spark gap with preionization. Proc. 18th IEEE Power Modulator Symp., 219–222.Google Scholar
Moran, S. & Hairfield, S. (1985). High pressure spark gap recovery after over-volted breakdown. Digest of Technical Papers IEEE Pulsed Power Conf., 473–476.Google Scholar
Moran, S. & Hardesty, L.W. (1991). High-repetition-rate hydrogen spark gap. IEEE Trans. Electr. Devices 38, 726–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrović, Z.L., Marković, V.L., Pejović, M.M. & Gocić, S.R. (2001). Memory effects in the afterglow: Open questions on long-lived species and the role of surface processes. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 34, 1756–1768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schade, E. & Ragaller, K. (1982). Dielectric recovery of an axially blown SF6-arc after current zero: Part I - Experimental investigations. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 10, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, G., Kristiansen, M. & Guenther, A. (1990). Gas Discharge Closing Switches. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Luo, H. & Hu, Y. (2007). Numerical simulation of the gas discharge in a gas peaking switch. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 35, 702–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Tang, J., Huang, J., Qiu, A., Guan, Z. & Wang, X. (2008). The application of flash-over switch in high energy fluence diode. Laser Part. Beams 26, 213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, X., Liu, R., Zeng, N., Han, M., Yuan, J., Wang, X. & Zhang, G. (2006). A pulsed power generator for X-pinch experiments. Laser Part. Beams 24, 503–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar