Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T07:58:52.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of ablation plasma characteristics of intense, pulsed, ion-beam evaporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Xiangdong Kang
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Beam Technology and Department of Electrical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Niigata 940–21, Japan
Katsumi Masugata
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Beam Technology and Department of Electrical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Niigata 940–21, Japan
Kiyoshi Yatsui
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Beam Technology and Department of Electrical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Niigata 940–21, Japan

Abstract

Basic characteristics of an ablation plasma produced by an intense, pulsed, ion beam have been evaluated from the measurement of ion-flux density by a biased ion collector. The target mass loss is detected by the measurement of the weight of the target in the comparison before and after the shot. A one-dimensional hydrodynamic model is introduced with the assumption of a high-power, light-ion beam-driven expansion and the following adiabatic expansion into vacuum. With this model, it is possible for us to deduce the temperature and the pressure from the data of the ion flux and the mass loss of the target, respectively. This method is also applicable to other intense pulsed energy sources such as lasers or electron beams.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, H.H. & Ziegler, J.F. 1980 Hydrogen Stopping Powers and Ranges in All Elements (Pergamon Press).Google Scholar
Dyer, P.E. et al. 1988 Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenberger, C. et al. 1977 J. Appl. Phys. 48, 1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, A.V. Jr. et al. 1979 Phys. Fluids 22, 859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, X.D. et al. 1994a Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, X.D. et al. 1994b Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, L1041.Google Scholar
Shimotori, Y. et al. 1986 Res. Report of lnst. of Plasma Phys., IPPJ-769 (2), p. 267.Google Scholar
Shimotori, Y. et al. 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 63, 968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimotori, Y. et al. 1989 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takaai, T. et al. 1990 Surface Engineering, ed. by Meguid, S.A. (Elsevier Sci. Pub. Ltd.), p. 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yatsui, K. et al. 1985 Laser Part. Beams 3, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yatsui, K. 1989 Laser Part. Beams 7, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yatsui, K. et al. 1994 Phys. Plasmas 1, 1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeldovich, Ya. B. & Raiser, Yu. P. 1968 Physics of Shock Wave and High Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Academic Press), Vol. II, p. 573.Google Scholar
Zheng, J.P. et al. 1989 Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar