Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Testing a threshold: an approximate replication of Johnson, Mercado & Acevedo 2012

  • Mark D. Johnson (a1) and Christine L. Nicodemus (a2)

Abstract

In order to better understand the role of working memory in second language (L2) written production, this study contributes to recent research attempting to apply Kellogg's model of working memory in first language (L1) writing to L2 writing research (Ellis & Yuan 2004; Ong & Zhang 2010; Johnson, Mercado & Acevedo 2012). This paper describes an approximate replication of a study presented by Johnson et al. (2012) in order to determine whether the effects of pre-task planning sub-processes (idea generation, organization, and goal setting) are mediated by a hypothesized threshold of proficiency in the target language. To do this, the current study replicated a quasi-experimental research design to test the effect of specific pre-task planning sub-processes on the written language production of a group of L1 speakers of English. Using measures identical to those in Johnson et al. (2012), the study found no significant, multivariate effect of pre-task planning on the fluency and complexity of the participants' written language production, suggesting no support for the hypothesized threshold of general proficiency in the target language. The implications of the study's results are discussed in terms of Kellogg's model (1996) of working memory in L1 writing and its ability to describe L2 composing processes.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bernhardt, E. B. & Kamil, M. L. (1995). Interpreting the relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 16, 1534.
Biber, D. & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9, 220.
Chenoweth, N. A. & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication 18, 8098.
Coniam, D. (1999). An investigation into the use of word frequency lists in computing vocabulary profiles. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 4, 103123.
Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Reading Research 35.2, 115135.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
De La Paz, S. & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 687698.
Ellis, R. & Yuan, P. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26, 5984.
Engber, C. A. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing 4, 139155.
Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education 5, 491520.
Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M. J. & Cox, B. E. (2006). Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research 38, 247273.
Flower, L. S. & Hayes, J. R. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In Gregg, L.W. & Steinberg, E. R. (eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 3150.
Galbraith, D., Ford, S., Walker, G. & Ford, J. (2005). The contribution of different components of working memory to knowledge transformation during writing. Educational Studies in Language and Literature 5, 113145.
Graham, S. & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology 99, 445476.
Grant, L. & Ginther, A. (2000). Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing 9, 123145.
Guiraud, P. (1960). Problèmes et méthodes de la statistique linguistique. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 128.
Heatley, A., Nation, I. S. P. & Coxhead, A. (2002). Range [Computer software]. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.
Jarvis, S. (2002). Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing 19, 5784.
Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowski, D. & Ferris, D. (2003). Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing 12, 377403.
Johnson, M. D., Acevedo, A. & Mercado, L. (2013). What vocabulary should we teach? Lexical frequency profiles and lexical diversity in second language writing. Writing and Pedagogy 5.1, 83103.
Johnson, M. D., Mercado, L. & Acevedo, A. (2012). The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 21, 264282.
Jones, S. & Tetroe, J. (1987). Composing in a second language. In Matsuhashi, A. (ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 3457.
Kellogg, R. T. (1987a). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory and Cognition 15, 256266.
Kellogg, R. T. (1987b). Writing performance: Effects of cognitive strategies. Written Communication 4, 269298.
Kellogg, R. T. (1988). Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 14, 355365.
Kellogg, R. T. (1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. American Journal of Psychology 103, 327342.
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 5771.
Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Competition for working memory among writing processes. American Journal of Psychology 114, 175191.
Kellogg, R. T. (2004). Working memory components in written sentence generation. The American Journal of Psychology 117, 314361.
Kormos, J. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing 20, 148161.
Laufer, B. (1994). The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time? RELC Journal 25, 2133.
Laufer, B. & Nation, I. S. P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics 16, 307322.
Lemmouh, Z. (2008). The relationship between grades and the lexical richness of student essays. Nordic Journal of English Studies 7.3, 163180.
Manchόn, R. & Roca de Larios, J. (2007). On the temporal nature of planning in L1 and L2 composing. Language Learning 57, 549593.
McCarthy, P. M. (2005). An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity (MTLD), Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
McCarthy, P. M. & Jarvis, S. (2007). Vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Testing 24, 459488.
McCarthy, P. M. & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods 42, 381392.
McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A. & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication 27, 5786.
McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., Cai, Z. & Graesser, A. (2005, 1 January). Coh-Metrix (Version 1.4). Retrieved October 2011 from http://cohmetrix.memphis.edu.
Ong, J. (2014). How do planning time and task conditions affect metacognitive processes of L2 writers? Journal of Second Language Writing 23, 1730.
Ong, J. & Zhang, L. J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 19, 218233.
Page-Voth, V. & Graham, S. (1999). Effects of goal setting and strategy use on the writing performance and self-efficacy of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology 91, 230240.
Rau, P. & Sebrechts, M. (1996). How initial plans mediate the expansion and resolution of options in writing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49, 616638.
Ransdell, S. & Levy, M. (1996). Working memory constraints on writing quality and fluency. In Levy, C. M. & Ransdell, S. (eds.), The science of writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 93105.
Ransdell, S., Levy, M. & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). The structure of writing processes as revealed by secondary task demands. Educational Studies in Language and Literature 2, 141163.
Rijlaarsdam, G. & van den Bergh, H. (2006). Writing process theory: A functional dynamic approach. In MacArthur, C., Graham, S. & Fitzgerald, J. (eds.), Handbook of writing research. New York: Guilford, 4153.
Rimmer, W. (2008). Putting grammatical complexity in context. Literacy 42, 2935.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22, 2757.
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics 43, 133.
Robinson, P. (2011a). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis on language learning and performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 337.
Robinson, P. (ed.) (2011b). Researching the cognition hypothesis on language learning and performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roca de Larios, J., Manchόn, R. & Murphy, L. (2006). Generating text in native and foreign language writing: A temporal analysis of problem-solving formulation processes. The Modern Language Journal 90, 100114.
Roca de Larios, J., Marín, J. & Murphy, L. (2001). A temporal analysis of formulation processes in L1 and L2 writing. Language Learning 51, 497538.
Roca de Larios, J., Manchόn, R., Murphy, L. & Marín, J. (2008). The foreign language writer's strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing 17, 3047.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education 12, 431459.
Sexton, M., Harris, K. & Graham, S. (1998). Self-regulated strategy development and the writing process: Effects on essay writing and attributions. Exceptional Children 64, 295311.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 183205.
Skibniewski, L. (1988). The writing processes of advanced foreign language learners in their native and foreign languages: Evidence from thinking-aloud and behavioral protocols. Studia Anglica Posnaiensia 21, 177186.
Skibniewski, L. & Skibniewska, M. (1986). Experimental study: The writing processes of intermediate/advanced foreign language learners in their foreign and native languages. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 19, 142163.
Troia, G. & Graham, S. (2002). The effectiveness of highly explicit, teacher-directed strategy instruction routine: Changing the writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 35, 290305.
Unsworth, L. (1997). Some practicalities of a language-based theory of learning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 31.3, 3042.
van den Bergh, H. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1999). The dynamics of generation during writing: An online study. In Torrance, M. & Galbraith, D. (eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 99118.
van der Hoeven, J. (1999). Differences in writing performance: Generating as an indicator. In Torrance, M. & Galbraith, D. (eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 6377.
Whalen, K. & Menard, N. (1995). L1 and L2 writers’ strategic and linguistic knowledge: A model of multiple-level discourse processing. Language Learning 45, 381418.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed