Alderson, J. C. (1978). A study of the doze procedure with native and non-native speakers of English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (1979). The cloze procedure as a measure of proficiency in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 219–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (1981). Reaction to Morrow paper. In Alderson & Hughes (eds.).Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (1987 a). Levels of reading comprehension: do they exist? Paper presented at the Reading Conference on Language Testing, 03 1987.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (ed.) (1987 b). Innovation in language testing: can the microcomputer help? Special Report No. 1: Language Testing Update.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (1988). Testing reading comprehension skills. Paper presented at the Sixth Colloquium on Research in Reading in a Second Language, TESOL Chicago, 03 1988.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. & Hughes, A. (1981). Issues in Language Testing. ELT Documents, III.Google Scholar

Alderson, C. J., Krahnke, K. J. & Stansfield, C. W. (eds.) (1987). Reviews of English language proficiency tests. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar

Allen, J. P. B. & Widdowson, H. C. (1984). Teaching the communicative use of English. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 1.Google Scholar

Andersen, E. B. & Madsen, M. (1977). Estimating the parameters of the latent population distribution. Psychometrika, 42, 141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachman, L. (1981). Formative evaluation in ESP program development. In Mackay, R. & Palmer, J. D. (eds.). Languages for Specific Purposes: program design and evaluation. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. (1982). The trait structure of cloze test scores. Tesol Quarterly, 16, 1, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachman, L. (1986). The Test Of English as a Foreign Language as a measure of communicative competence. In Stansfield (ed.) (1986 a).Google Scholar

Bachman, L. (1988). The development and use of criterion-referenced tests of language proficiency in language program evaluation. In Johnson, R. K. (ed.), The coherent language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. (forthcoming). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. & Clark, J. (1987). The measurement of foreign/second language proficiency. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 490, 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1981 a). The construct validation of the FSI oral interview. Language Learning, 31, 1, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1981 b). A multitrait-multimethod investigation into the construct validity of six tests of speaking and reading. In Palmer, Groot & Trosper (eds.).Google Scholar

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1982). The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 4, 449–65.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1983). Oral Interview Test of Communicative Proficiency in English. Urbana, Ill.: Photo-offset.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1984). Some comments on the terminology of language testing. In Rivera (ed.) (1984 a).Google Scholar

Bachman, L. & Savignon, S. (1986). The evaluation of communicative language proficiency: a critique of the ACTFL oral interview. Modern Language Journal, 70, 4, 380–90.Google Scholar

Bates, M. & Dudley-Evans, T. (1982). Nucleus General Science; Teacher's Manual (expanded new edition). London: Longman.Google Scholar

Beebe, L. M. & Zuengler, J. (1983). Accommodation theory: an explanation for style shifting in second language dialect studies. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (eds.). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Berk, R. A. (1980). A consumer's guide to criterion-referenced test reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 186–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bialystok, E. (1982). Some evidence for the integrity and interaction of two knowledge sources. In Andersen, R. W. (ed.), New dimensions in second language acquisition research. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. & Wood-Smith, Shar M. (1985). Interlanguagc is not a state of mind. Applied Linguistics, 6, 101–17.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S., Enclehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Kratwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Bolus, R., Hinofotis, F. B. & Bailey, K. (1982). An introduction to gencralisability theory in second language research. Language Learning, 32, 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brièhe, E. J. & Hinofotis, F. B. (eds.) (1979). Concepts in language testing: some recent studies. Washington, D.C.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brumfit, C. J. (1981) Notional syllabuses revisited – a response. Applied Linguistics, 2, 1, 90–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrnes, H. (1984). Grammar – communicative competence – functions/notions: implications for and from a proficiency orientation. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 17, 2, 194–206.Google Scholar

Byrnes, H. (1987). Second language acquisition: insights from a proficiency orientation. In Byrnes, H. & Canale, M. (eds.), Defining and developing proficiency: guidelines, implementations, and concepts. Lincolnwood, Ill.: National Textbook Co.Google Scholar

Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (1982). Cambridge examinations in English: changes in the syllabus 1984.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-mulrimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.Google Scholar

Canale, M. (1983 a). From communicative competence to communicative performance. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (eds.). Language and communication.Google Scholar

Canale, M. (1983 b). On some dimensions of language proficiency. In Oller (ed.)Google Scholar

Canale, M. (1984 a). Considerations in the testing of reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 349–57.Google Scholar

Canale, M. (1984 b). A communicative approach to language proficiency assessment in a minority setting. In Rivera (ed.), (1984 a).Google Scholar

Canale, M. (1985). Proficiency-orientated achievement testing. Paper presented at the Master Lecture Series of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, at the Defense Language Institute, 03 1985.Google Scholar

Canale, M. (1986). The promise and threat of computerised adaptive testing. In Stansfield (ed.).Google Scholar

Canale, M. (forthcoming). The measurement of communicative competence. In Brumfit, C. J. (ed.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1988. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Candlin, C. N. (1986). Explaining communicative competence: limits of testability? In Stansfield (ed.) (1986 a).Google Scholar

Carroll, B. J. (1978). Specifications for an English language testing service. London: British Council.Google Scholar

Carroll, B. J. (1980). Testing communicative performance. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Carroll, B. J. & Hall, P. J. (1985). Make your own language tests: a practical guide to writing language performance tests. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. C. (ed.). Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1983). Psychometric theory and language testing. In Oller (1983).Google Scholar

Chen, Z. & Henning, G. (1985). Linguistic and cultural bias in language proficiency tests. Language Testing, 2, 2, 155–63.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. (1985). Profiling second language development: a procedure for assessing L2 proficiency. In Hyltenstam & Pienemann (eds.)Google Scholar

Clark, J. (1978). Direct testing of speaking proficiency: theory and application. Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Clark, J. (1979). Direct vs. semi-direct tests of speaking ability. In Brièrc & Hinofotis (eds.).Google Scholar

Clark, J. & Hamilton, J. (1984), Syllabus. guidelines I. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.Google Scholar

Clifford, R. (1981). Convergent and discriminant validation of integrated and unitary language skills: the need for a research model. In Palmer, Groot & Trosper (eds.).Google Scholar

Cohen, A. (1980). Testing language ability in the classroom. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. (1984). On taking language tests: what the students report. Language Testing, 1, 70–81.Google Scholar

Criper, C. & Davies, A. (1987). Edinburgh ELTS Validation Project: final report. London: British Council.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. (1983). Language proficiency and academic achievement. In Oller (ed.).Google Scholar

Cummins, J. (1984). Wanted: a theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. In Rivera (ed.) (1984 b).Google Scholar

Cziko, G. (1981). Psychometric and edumetric approaches to language testing: implications and applications. Applied Linguistics, 2, 1, 28–44.Google Scholar

Cziko, G. (1982). Improving the psychometric, criterion-referenced, and practical qualities of integrative language tests. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 3, 367–79.Google Scholar

Cziko, G. (1984). Some problems with empirically-based models of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 5, 1, 23–38.Google Scholar

Cziko, G. & Lin, N.-H. J. (1984). The construction and analysis of short scales of language proficiency: classical psychometric, latent trait, and nonparametric approaches. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 4, 627–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, F., Hudson, T. & Lynch, B. (1985). Language testing: operationalisation in classroom measurement and L2 research. In Celce-Muria, M. (ed.). Beyond basics. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Davies, A. (1977). The construction of language tests. In Allen, J. P. B. & Davies, A. (eds.), The Edinburgh Course in Applied Linguistics: Vol. 4: Testing and experimental methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, A. (1978). Language testing: survey articles 1 and 2. Language Teaching and Linguistics Abstracts, 11, 145–59 and 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, A. (1984). Validating three tests of English language proficiency. Language Testing, 1, 1, 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, A. (1987). Review of Certificale of Proficiency in English. In Alderson, Krahnke & Stansfield (eds.).Google Scholar

Douglas, D. (1986). Communicative competence and tests of oral skills. In Stansfield (ed.).Google Scholar

Douglas, D. (1988). Testing listening comprehension in the context of the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 2, 245–62.Google Scholar

Douglas, D. & Selinker, L. (1985). Principles for language tests within the ‘discourse domains’ theory of interlanguage: research, test construction, and interpretation. Language Testing, 2, 2, 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulay, H. C., Burt, M. K. & Hernandez-Chavez, E. (1975). Bilingual syntax measure. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Dulay, H. C., Bury, M. K., Hernandez-Chavez, E. & Taleporos, E. (1978). Bilingual syntax measure II. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1987), Interlanguagc variability in narrative discourse: style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 1, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erickson, F. (1981). Some approaches to inquiry in school-community ethnography. In Treuba, H. T., Guthrie, G. P. & Au, H. P. (eds.), Culture and the bilingual classroom; studies in classroom ethnography. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In Faerch, C. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Farhady, H. (1979). The disjunctive fallacy between discrete point and integrative testing. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 3, 347–57.Google Scholar

Farhady, H. (1980). Justification, development, and validation of functional language testing. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of language proficiency from the learner's perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 1, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farhady, H. (1983). On the plausibility of the unitary language proficiency factor. In Oller (ed.).Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Ideal readers and real readers. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1981. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Frith, J. R. (1982). Measuring spoken language proficiency. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Genessee, F. & Hamayan, E. (1980). Individual differences in second language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 95–110.Google Scholar

Goldstein, H. (1979). Consequences of using the Rasch Model for educational assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 5, 211–20.Google Scholar

Gorman, T. & Brooks, G. (1986). Assessing oracy. In Portal (ed.).Google Scholar

Grotjahn, R. (1986). Test validation and cognitive psychology: some methodological considerations. Language Testing, 3, 2, 159–87.Google Scholar

Hamp-Lyons, E. (1987). Review of First Certificate in English. In Alderson, Krahnke & Stansfield (eds.).Google Scholar

Hansen, J. & Stansfield, C. (1981). The relationship between field dependent-independent cognitive styles to foreign language achievement. Language Learning, 31, 2, 349–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harley, B. (1986). Age in second language acquisition. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Harrison, A. (1986). Assessing text in action. In Portal (ed.).Google Scholar

Hauptmann, P., Leblanc, R. & Wesche, M. (eds.) (1985). Second language performance testing. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar

Heaton, J. B. (ed.) (1982). Language testing. London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar

Heaton, J. B. (ed.). (1988). Writing English language tests (new edition). London: Longman.Google Scholar

Henning, G. (1987). A guide to language testing. Cambridge, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Henning, G., Hudson, T. & Turner, J. (1985). Item response theory and the assumption of unidimensionality for language tests. Language Testing, 2, 2, 141–54.Google Scholar

Higgs, T. V. (1984). Teaching for proficiency: the organizing principle. Lincolnwood, Ill.: National Textbook Co.Google Scholar

Higgs, T. V. & Clifford, R. T. (1982). The push towards communication. In Higgs, T. V. (ed.). Curriculum, competence, and the foreign language teacher. Skokie, Il.: National Textbook Co.Google Scholar

Hinofotis, F. B., Schumann, J., McGroahty, M., Erickson, M., Hudson, T., Kimbell, L. & Scott, M. L. (1982). Relating FSI oral interview scores to grammatical analyses of learners' speech. Manuscript, ESL Department, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Hudson, T. & Lynch, B. (1984). A criterion-referenced approach to ESL achievement testing. Language Testing, 1, 2, 171–201.Google Scholar

Hughes, A. (1981). Epilogue. In Alderson & Hughes (1981).Google Scholar

Hughes, A. (1986). A pragmatic approach to criterion-referenced foreign language testing. In Portal (ed.).Google Scholar

Hughes, A. (1988). Testing English for university study. London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar

Hughes, A. (in press). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, C. (1986). The classroom assessment of English language skills. Teaching English, 19, 3.Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K. & Pienemann, M. (eds.) (1985). Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. P. & Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Ingram, D. (1985). Assessing proficiency: an overview of some aspects of testing. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds.).Google Scholar

Ingram, D. & Wylie, E. (1982). Australian second language proficiency ratings. Canberra: Australian Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (First Edition published 1979, Second Edition November 1982).Google Scholar

James, C. J. (ed.) (1985). Foreign language proficiency in the classroom and beyond. Lincolnwood, Ill.; National Textbook Co.Google Scholar

Johns, T. F. & Dudley-Evans, A. D. (1980). An experiment in the team teaching of overseas postgraduate students of the transportation and plant biology. ELT Documents, 106.Google Scholar

Jones, R. L. (1979). Performance testing of second language proficiency. In Brière & Hinofotis.Google Scholar

Jones, R. L. (1985 a). Some basic considerations in testing oral proficiency. In Lee, Fok, Lord & Low (eds.).Google Scholar

Jones, R. L. (1985 b). Second language performance testing: an overview. In Hauptman, LeBlanc & Wesche (eds.).Google Scholar

De Jong, J. H. A. L. & Glas, C. A. W. (1987). Validation of listening comprehension tests using item response theory. Language Testing, 4, 2, 170–94.Google Scholar

Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbum, D. (1981). LISREL V: user's guide. Chicago: National Educational Resources.Google Scholar

Kilborn, M., Johnstone, R. & Kent, D. (1987). Adapting a theoretical framework for use in the classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the British Association of Applied Linguistics, Nottingham, 09 1987.Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language journal, 70, 366–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23, 30–87.Google Scholar

Lado, R. (1961). Language testing: the construction and use of foreign language tests. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. H. (in press). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Lee, Y. P., Fok, A. C. Y. Y., Lord, R. & Low, G. (eds.) (1985). New directions in language testing. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Lewkowicz, J. (1983). Method effect in testing reading comprehension: a comparison of three methods. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar

Long, J. S. (1983 a). Covariance structure models: an introduction to LISREL. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Long, J. S. (1983 b). Confirmatory factor analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Low, G. (1981). Communicative testing as an optimistic activity. Working Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 4, 1–18.Google Scholar

Low, G. (1984). Validity and the problem of direct language proficiency. Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education 6.Google Scholar

Low, G. & Lee, Y. P. (nd). Testing what it's not: the problem of validating language tests. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar

Lowe, P. (1983). The oral interview: origins, applications, pitfalls, and implications. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 16, 230–44.Google Scholar

Lowe, P. (1985). The ILR proficiency scale as a synthcsising research principle: the view from the mountain. In James (ed.).Google Scholar

Lowe, P. (1986). Proficiency, panacea, framework, process? A reply to Kramsch, Schulz, and particularly, to Bachman and Savignon. Modern Language Journal, 70, 4, 391–7.Google Scholar

Madsen, H. (1983). Techniques in testing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Madsen, H. & Jones, R. L. (1981). Classification of oral proficiency tests. In Palmer, Groot & Trosper (eds.).Google Scholar

Mead, R. J., Wright, B. D. & Bell, S. R. (1979). BICAL: version 3. Chicago: Dept. of Education, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Milanovic, M. (1988). The construction and validation of a performance-based battery of English language progress tests. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of London.Google Scholar

Mislevy, R. J. & Bock, D. (1984). Bilog II: item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Mooresville, Ind.: Scientific Software.Google Scholar

Morrow, K. (1977). Techniques of evaluation for a notional syllabus. London: Royal Society of Arts.Google Scholar

Morrow, K. (1979). Communicative language testing: revolution or evolution? In Brumfit, C. J. & Johnson, K. (eds.), The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morrow, K. (1986). The evaluation of tests of communicative performance. In Portal (ed.).Google Scholar

Morrow, K. (1987). Review of University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate: Preliminary English Test. In Alderson, Krahnke & Stansfield (eds.).Google Scholar

Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, D., (1980). Engineering lecture discourse and listening comprehension. Report on English for Specific Purposes Project, King Abdul Aziz University: University of Lancaster.Google Scholar

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd edition). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Oller, J. W. (1971). Dictation as a device for testing foreign language proficiency. English Language Teaching, 25, 3, 254–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oller, J. W. (1972). Assessing competence in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 6, 313–25.Google Scholar

Oller, J. W. (1979). Language tests at school: a pragmatic approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Oller, J. W. (ed.). (1983). Issues in language testing research. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Oller, J. W. (1986). Communication theory and testing: what and how. In Stansfield (ed.) (1986 a).Google Scholar

Oller, J. W. & Perkins, K. (1978). Intelligence and language proficiency as sources of variance in self-reported affective variables. Language Learning, 28, 1, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oller, J. W. & Perkins, K. (1980). Research in language testing. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Oskarson, M. (1988). Self-assessment of language proficiency: rationale and applications. Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Language Testing Research Colloquium, University of Illinois, 03 1988.Google Scholar

Page, B. & Hewett, D. (1987). Languages step by step: graded objectives in the U.K. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.Google Scholar

Palmer, A. S., Ghoot, P. J. M. & Trosper, G. A. (1981). The construct validation of tests of communicative competence. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar

Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioural research: explanation and prediction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Ptenemann, M. & Johnston, M. (1986). An acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 92–122.Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. & Johnston, M. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 2, 217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollitt, A. (in press). Diagnostic assessment through item banking. In Entwistle, N. (ed.). Handbook of educational ideas and practices. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Pollitt, A. & Hutchinson, C. (1987). Calibrating graded assessments: Rasch partial credit analysis of performance in writing. Language Testing, 4, 1, 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Politzer, R. L. & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviours and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 1, 103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popham, W. J. (1978). Criterion-referenced measurement. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Portal, M. (ed.) (1986). Innovations in language testing. Windsor, Berks.: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Porter, D. (1983). Assessing communicative proficiency: the search for validity. In Johnson, K. & Porter, D. (eds.), Perspectives in communicative language teaching. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Porter, D. (in press). A language testing handbook. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Powers, D. E. (1986). Academic demands related to listening skills. Language Testing, 3, 1–38.Google Scholar

Rea, P. (1985). Language testing and the communicative teaching curriculum. In Lee, Fok, Lord & Low (eds.).Google Scholar

Rea, P. (1988). The relationship between grammatical abilities and aspects of communicative competence: with special reference to the testing of grammar. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Lancaster.Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (1985). Language curriculum development. University of Hawaii Working Papers, 4, 1, 1–40.Google Scholar

Rivera, C. (ed.) (1984 a). Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Rivera, C. (ed.). (1984 b). Language proficiency and academic achievement. Clcvedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Rivera, C. (ed.) (1984 c). Placement procedures in bilingual education: education and policy issues. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Royal Society of Arts (1981). Examinations in the communicative use of English as a foreign language: specifications and specimen papers. London: Royal Society of Arts.Google Scholar

Sang, F., Schmftz, B., Vollmer, H. J., Baumert, J. & Roeder, P. M. (1986). Models of second language competence: a structural equation approach. Language Testing, 3, 1, 54–79.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. W. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: a case study of an adult. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Scott, M. L. & Madsen, H. S. (1983). The influence of retesting on test affect. In Oller (ed.).Google Scholar

Seaton, I. (1982). Proficiency testing for tertiary level study and training in Britain. In Heaton (ed.).Google Scholar

Shohamy, E. (1983). The stability of the oral proficiency trait on the oral interview speaking test. Language Learning, 33, 527–40.Google Scholar

Shohamy, E. (1984 a). Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 1, 2, 147–70.Google Scholar

Shohamy, E. (1984 b). Input and output in language testing. In Culhane, T., Klein-Braley, C. & Stevenson, D. (eds.). Practice and problems in language testing, 159–66. Occasional Papers. No. 29. Colchester. Essex Department of Language and Linguistics.Google Scholar

Shohamy, E. (1988). A proposed framework for testing the oral language of second/foreign language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 2, 165–80.Google Scholar

Shohamy, E. & Reves, T. (1985). Authentic language tests: where from and where to? Language Testing, 2, 1, 48–59.Google Scholar

Shohamy, E., Reves, T. & Bejerano, Y. (1986). Introducing a new comprehensive test of oral proficiency. English Language Teaching Journal, 40, 212–20.Google Scholar

Sholz, G., Hendricks, D., Spurling, R., Johnson, M. & Vandenburg, L. (1980). Is language ability divisible or unitary? A factor analysis of 22 English language proficiency levels. In Oiler & Perkins (eds.).Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1984). Issues in the testing of English for specific purposes. Language Testing, 1, 2, 202–20.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1986). The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. Language Testing, 3, 2, 188–221.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1987). Variability and language testing. In Ellis, R. (ed.), Second language acquisition in context. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1988). A comparison of first and foreign language learning ability, ESOL Department, Institute of Education, London University: Working Documents No. 8.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (in press). Individual differences in second and foreign language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Spolsky, B. (1978). Introduction: linguistics and language testers. In Spolsky, B. (ed.). Advances in Language Testing: series 2, Approach to language testing. VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Spolsky, B. (1985). The limits of authenticity in language testing. Language Testing, 2, 2, 31–40.Google Scholar

Spolsky, B. (1986). A multiple choice for language testers. Language Testing, 3, 2, 147–58.Google Scholar

Spurling, S. & Ilyin, D. (1985). The impact of learner variables on language test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 2, 283–301.Google Scholar

Stansfield, C. (ed). (1986 a). Towards communicative competence testing: Proceedings of the Second TOEFL Invitational Conference.Princeton, N.J.:Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Stansfield, C. (ed.) (1986 b). Technology and language testing. Washington. D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar

Stansfield, C. (1986 c). A history of the Test of Written English: the developmental year. Language Testing, 3, 2, 224–34.Google Scholar

Stevenson, D. (1981). Beyond faith and face validity: the multitrait-multimethod matrix and the convergent and discriminant validity of oral proficiency tests. In Palmer, Groot & Trosper (eds.).Google Scholar

Stevenson, D. (1985). Pop validity and performance testing. In Lee, Fok, Lord & Low (eds.).Google Scholar

Swain, M. (1985 a). Large-scale communicative language testing: a case study. In Lee, Fok, Lord & Low (eds.).Google Scholar

Swain, M. (1985 b). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and output in its development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (eds.). Input and second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Tall, G. (1981). The possible dangers of applying the Rasch Model to school examinations and standardised tests. In Lacey, C. & Lawton, D. (eds.). Issues in education and accountability. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability in interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 2, 143–63.Google Scholar

Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Test in English for Educational Purposes (TEEP) (1984). Information manual. Aldershot, Hampshire: Associated Examining Board.Google Scholar

Traub, R. E. (1983). A priori considerations in choosing an item response model. In Hambleton, R. K. (ed.). Applications of item response theory. Vancouver, B.C.: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.Google Scholar

Underhill, N. (1987). Testing spoken language: a handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Upshur, J. A. (1979). Functional proficiency theory and a research role for language tests. In Brière & Hinofotis (eds.).Google Scholar

Upshur, J. A. & Homburg, T. J. (1983). Some relations among language tests at successive ability levels. In Oller (ed.).Google Scholar

Vollmer, H. J. & Sang, F. (1983). Competing hypotheses about second language ability: a plea for caution. In Oller (ed.).Google Scholar

Weir, C. J. (1983). Identifying the language needs of overseas students in tertiary education in the United Kingdom. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of London.Google Scholar

Weir, C. J. (1988). Communicative language testing. Exeter Linguistics Studies No. 11: University of Exeter.Google Scholar

Wesche, M. (1981). Communicative testing in a second language. Canadian Modern Language Review, 37, 551–71.Google Scholar

Wesche, M. (1987). Second language performance testing: the Ontario Test of ESL as an example. Language Testing, 4, 1, 28–47.Google Scholar

Wolf, A., Goldstein, H. & Silver, R. (1986). The same but different. Education Guardian, 06 3.Google Scholar

Wolfram, W. (1985). Variability in tense marking: a case for the obvious. Language Learning, 35, 2, 229–53.Google Scholar

Woods, A. & Baker, R. (1985). Item response theory. Language Testing, 2, 2, 119–40.Google Scholar