Skip to main content Accessibility help

Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest

  • Ann M. Johns (a1)


Genre, the most social constructivist of literacy concepts, has been theorized and variously applied to pedagogies by three major ‘schools’: the New Rhetoric, English for Specific Purposes, and Systemic Functional Linguistics. In this paper, I will discuss my long, and ongoing, search for a pedagogy drawn from genre theories for novice academic students. With others, I am trying to find or develop an approach that is coherent and accessible to students while still promoting rhetorical flexibility and genre awareness. I will first define and problematize the term genre. Then, I will briefly discuss what each of the three genre ‘schools’ can offer to novice students – as well as their pedagogical shortcomings. Finally, I will suggest two promising approaches to teaching genre awareness: learning communities and ‘macro-genres’.



Hide All
Aridjis, H. (2003). 1492: The life and times of Juan Cabezon of Castile. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
Bawarshi, A. (2003). Genre and the invention of the writer. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Bazerman, C. (1997). The life of genre, the life in the classroom. In Bishop, W. & Ostrom, H. (eds.), Genre and writing: Issues, arguments, and alternatives. Portsmouth, NJ: Boynton/Cook, 1926.
Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bhatia, V. J. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Carter, M. (2007). Ways of knowing, doing, and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication 58, 385418.
Chen, R. & Hyon, S. (2005). Faculty evaluation as a genre system: Negotiating intertextuality and interpersonality. Journal of Applied Linguistics 2, 153184.
Christie, F. (1991). Literacy in Australia. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 12, 142–55.
Coe, R. M., Lingard, L. & Teslenko, T. (eds.) (2002). The rhetoric and ideology of genres. Cresskill, NH: Hampton Press.
Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Maryborough, Victoria: Australian Primary English Teaching Association.
Devitt, A., Reiff, M. J. & Bawarshi, A. (2004). Scenes of writing: Strategies for composing with genres. London: Longman.
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.
Faltis, C. J. & Wolfe, P. (eds.) (1999). So much to say: Adolescents, bilingualism and ESL in secondary school. New York: Teachers College Press.
Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: Macquarie University.
Feez, S. (2002). Heritage and innovation in second language education. In Johns, (ed.), 43–72.
Flowerdew, J. (1993). A process, or educational approach to the teaching of professional genres. ELT Journal 47, 305316.
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. In Johns, (ed.), 91–104.
Freedman, A. (1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English 27, 222251.
Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London: Longman.
Harklau, L. (1999). The ESL learning environment in secondary school. In Faltis, & Wolfe, (eds.), 42–60.
Hasan, R. (1985). The structure of text. In Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R.. (eds.), Language, context, and text. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press, 5269.
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory textbooks. English for Specific Purposes 18, 326.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model for interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7, 173192.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 30, 693722.
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johns, A. M. (2001). An interdisciplinary, interinstitutional, learning communities program: Student involvement and student success. In Leki, I.. (ed.), Academic writing programs. Alexandria, VA: TESOL, 6172.
Johns, A. M. (2002a). Destabilizing students' literacy theories. In Johns, (ed.), 237248. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Johns, A. M. (ed.) (2002b). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Johns, A. M. (2007). AVID college readiness: Working with sources. San Diego, CA: AVID Center.
Johns, A. M. & Price-Machado, D. (2001). English for Specific Purposes (ESP): Tailoring courses to student needs – and to the outside world. In Celce-Murcia, M.. (ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd edn.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, 4354.
Macbeth, K. P. (2006). Diverse, unforeseen, and quaint difficulties: The sensible responses of novices to learning to follow directions in academic writing. Research in the Teaching of English 41, 108207.
Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). ‘Something to shoot for’: A Systemic Functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school. In Johns, (ed.), 17–42.
Martin, J. R. (1993). Genre and literacy – modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13, 141172.
Mohan, B. & Slater, T. (2006). Examining the theory/practice relation in high school science register: A functional linguistic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5, 302316.
Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre in the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Paltridge, B. (2006). Crossing the boundaries of genre studies. Journal of Second Language Writing 15, 234249. [Co-written with Johns, A. M., Bawarshi, A., Coe, R. M., Hyland, K., Reiff, M. J. & Tardy, C. M..]
Rose, D. (2006). Learning to read: Reading to learn. Handout, University of Sydney.
Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication 14, 504554.
Russell, D. & Fisher, D. (forthcoming). On-line multimedia case studies for professional education: Revisioning concepts of genre recognition. In Giltrow, J. & Stein, D. (eds.), Theories of genre and the internet. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Samraj, B. (2004). Discourse features of student-produced academic papers: Variations across disciplinary courses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3, 522.
Schleppergrell, M. & Oliveira, L. C. (2006). An integrated language and content approach for history teachers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5, 254269.
Short, D. (1999). Integrating language and content for effective sheltered English programs. In Faltis, & Wolfe, (eds.), pp. 105–137.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (1998). Other floors, other voices: A textography of a small university building. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd edn.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest

  • Ann M. Johns (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.