Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:17:34.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First Person Singular: Building the road as we travel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2015

Michael H. Long
Michael H. Long*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, USAmlong5@umd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

After completing a law degree at the University of Birmingham when I was 20 and not really knowing what I wanted to do, except that it was not law, I became an English as a foreign language (EFL) teacher accidentally through signing up as a volunteer with the British United Nations Association (BUNA), roughly equivalent to the US Peace Corps. Instead of being dispatched to assist starving people through a remote third-world community development project, as I had naively expected, I was sent on a fast-paced, two-week English as a second language (ESL) teacher-training course at a well-known private language school, International House, on Shaftesbury Avenue, in the heart of London's West End. Then came a one-week BUNA ‘orientation’ course in the suburbs. A hundred-plus neophyte volunteers were lectured on how to deliver a baby, how to deal with snake bites, how to remove leeches using gasoline or matches (but not both), the importance of taking anti-malaria pills daily without fail (pills subsequently found to be 100% ineffective), and how to avoid schistosomiasis (snail fever). On the last day, I was informed that, contrary to what I had first been told, I would not after all be going to Afghanistan, but to Peru. A week later, I arrived in Lima, a bustling Latin-American metropolis with no shortage of mid-wives, no malaria, no snakes, no snails and not a leech in sight. In the face of pervasive poverty, corruption, violence, and illiteracy, I had been sent several thousand miles, with absolutely no understanding of how people learn languages and minimal understanding of how to teach them, to provide free English classes for the relatively wealthy, mostly middle-class faculty and students in the Faculty of Law of Peru's leading university, the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.

Type
Discussion
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , October 2015 , pp. 561 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 59, 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, D. (1966). From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books/London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32, 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 206–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2012). Frequency-based accounts of second language acquisition. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 193–210.Google Scholar
Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research 29.3, 311–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E. M. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In Hatch, E. M. (ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 402–435.Google Scholar
Hoyer, W. J. & Lincourt, A. E. (1998). Ageing and the development of learning. In Stadler, M. A. & Frensch, P. A. (eds.), Handbook of implicit learning. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 445–470.Google Scholar
Janacsek, K., Fiser, J. & Nemeth, D. (2012). The best time to acquire new skills: Age-related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan. Developmental Science 15, 4, 496–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond positivism and relativism. Theory, method, and evidence. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1981a). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In Winitz, H. (ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 379, 259–278.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1981b). Questions in foreigner talk discourse. Language Learning 31.1, 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983a). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 5.2, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics 4.2, 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983c). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly 17.3, 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In Beebe, L. M. (ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House/Harper and Row, 115–141.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12, 3, 251–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R. B. & Kramsch, C. (eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Academic Press, 413–468.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1999). Ebonics, language and power. In Pincus, F. L. & Ehrlich, H. J. (eds.), Race and ethnic conflict. Contending views on prejudice, discrimination, and ethnoviolence. (2nd edn). Westview/Harper Collins, 331–345.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in Task-Based Language Teaching. In Lambert, R. H. & Shohamy, E. (eds.) Language policy and pedagogy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, 487–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005a). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In Long, M. H. (ed.), Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005b). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics 43, 287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007a). Second and foreign language education. In Mathinson, S. & Ross, W. (eds.), Battleground schools: An encyclopedia of conflict and controversy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 249–254.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007b). Problem solving and theory change in SLA. In Long, M. H., Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 21–40.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2009). Methodological principles for language teaching. In Long, M. H. & Doughty, C. J. (eds.), Handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2013a). Identifying and satisfying language needs for TBLT in the tourist industry. In Bosch Roig, G. I. (ed.), Teaching foreign languages for tourism: Research and practice. Berlin: Peter Lang, 21–44.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2013b). Maturational constraints on child and adult SLA. In Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. & Adamson, D. (2012). SLA research and Arizona's Structured English Immersion policies. In Valdez, G. & Faltis, C. (eds.), Implementing English language learning policy in Arizona: An examination of legal, historical and current practices of SEI. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters, 39–55.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. & Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching. London: Routledge, 597–603.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In Doughty, C. J. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–41.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In Seliger, H. W. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Classroom-oriented research on second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 268–285.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. & Sato, C. J. (1984). Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective. In Davies, A., Criper, C. & Howatt, A. P. R. (eds.), Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 253–280.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review 63, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, L. (1971). A minimal language-teaching program. In Pimsleur, P. & Quinn, T. (eds.), The psychology of second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–18.Google Scholar
Newmark, L., & Reibel, D. (1968). Necessity and sufficiency in language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics 4.2, 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Long, M. H., & Doughty, C. J. (eds.), Handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, 578–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1995). English in the world/the world in English. In Tollefson, J. W. (ed.), Power and inequality in language education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 34–58.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2007). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In Garcia-Mayo, M. (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters, 7–26.Google Scholar
Sato, C. J. (1985). Linguistic inequality in Hawaii: The post-creole dilemma. In Wolfson, N. & Manes, J. (eds.), Language of inequality. Berlin: Mouton, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, C. J. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In Day, R. R. (ed.), ‘Talking to learn’: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 23–45.Google Scholar
Sato, C. J. (1989). A nonstandard approach to Standard English. TESOL Quarterly 23.2, 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, C. J. (1991). Sociolinguistic variation and language attitudes in Hawaii. In Cheshire, J. (ed.), English around the world: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 647–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, C. J. (1993). Language change in a creole continuum: Decreolization? In Hyltenstam, K. & Viberg, A. (eds.), Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 122–143.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11.2, 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1991). French immersion and its off-shoots: Getting two for one. In Freed, B. F. (ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, 91–103.Google Scholar
Vatz, K., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R. & Doughty, C. J. (2013). Aptitude-treatment interaction studies in second language acquisition: Findings and methodology. In Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 272–292.Google Scholar
White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The Input Hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics 8.1, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1972). The teaching of English as communication. English Language Teaching 27.1, 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yano, Y., Long, M. H. & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning 44.2, 189–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar