Skip to main content Accessibility help

What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school*

  • Shirley Brice Heath (a1)


Abstract “Ways of taking” from books are a part of culture and as such are more varied than current dichotomies between oral and literate traditions and relational and analytic cognitive styles would suggest. Patterns of language use related to books are studied in three literate communities in the Southeastern United States, focusing on such “literacy events” as bedtime story reading. One community, Maintown, represents mainstream, middle-class school-oriented culture; Roadville is a white mill community of Appalachian origin; the third, Trackton, is a black mill community of recent rural origin. The three communities differ strikingly in their patterns of language use and in the paths of language socialization of their children. Trackton and Roadville are as different from each other as either is from Maintown, and the differences in preschoolers' language use are reflected in three different patterns of adjustment to school. This comparative study shows the inadequacy of the prevalent dichotomy between oral and literate traditions, and points also to the inadequacy of unilinear models of child language development and dichotomies between types of cognitive styles. Study of the development of language use in relation to written materials in home and community requires a broad framework of sociocultural analysis. (Crosscultural analysis, ethnography of communication, language development, literacy, narratives.)



Hide All
Basso, K. (1974). The ethonography of writing. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge University Press.
Cazden, C. B. (1979). Peekaboo as an instructional model: Discourse development at home and at school. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 17 129.
Chanan, G., & Gilchrist, L. (1974). What school is for. New York: Praeger.
Childs, C. P., & Greenfield, P. M. (1980). Informal modes of learning and teaching. In Warren, N. (ed), Advances in cross-cultural psychology, vol. 2 London: Academic Press.
Cochran-Smith, M. (1981). The making of a reader. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
Cohen, R. (1968). The relation between socio-conceptual styles and orientation to school requirements. Sociology of Education 41: 201–20.
Cohen, R.(1969). Conceptual styles, culture conflict, and nonverbal tests of intelligence. American Anthropologist 71 (5): 828–56.
Cohen, R.(1971). The influence of conceptual rule-sets on measures of learning ability. In Brace, C. L., Gamble, G., & Bond, J. (eds.), Race and intelligence. (Anthropological Studies, No. 8, American Anthropological Association). 4157.
Glaser, R. (1979). Trends and research questions in psychological research on learning and schooling. Educational Researcher 8 (10): 613.
Goody, E. (1979). Towards a theory of questions. In Goody, E. N. (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Griffin, P., & Humphrey, F. (1978). Task and talk. In The study ofchildren&s functional language and education in the early years. Final report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Heath, S. (1978). Teacher talk: Language in the classroom. (Language in Education 9.) Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Heath, S.(1980). The functions and uses of literacy. Journal of Communication 30 (1): 123–33.
Heath, (1982). Questioning at home and at school: A comparative study. In Spindler, G. (ed.), Doing ethnography: Educational anthropology in action. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Heath, . (forthcoming a). Protean shapes: Ever-shifting oral and literate traditions. To appear in Tannen, D. (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Heath.(forthcoming b). Ways with words: Ethnography of communication in communities and classrooms.
Howard, R. (1974). A note on S&Z. In Barthes, R., Introduction to S&Z. Trans. Richard, Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.
Hymes, D. H. (1973). On the origins and foundations of inequality among speakers. In Haugen, E. & Bloomfield, M. (eds.), Language as a human problem. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Hymes, D. H. (1974). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kagan, J., Sigel, I., & Moss, H. (1963). Psychological significance of styles of conceptualization. In Wright, J. & Kagan, J. (eds.), Basic cognitive processes in children. (Monographs of the society for research in child development.) 28 (2): 73112.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Merritt, M. (1979). Service-like events during individual work time and their contribution to the nature of the rules for communication. NIE Report EP 78−0436.
Ninio, A., & Bruner, I. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labelling. Journal of Child Language 5: 115.
Payne, C., & Bennett, Ca. (1977). “Middle class aura” in public schools. The Teacher Educator 13 (1): 1626.
Peters, A. (1977). Language learning strategies. Language 53 560–73.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1979). The literate two-year old: The fictionalization of self. Working Papers in 'Sociolinguistics. Austin, TX: Southwest Regional Laboratory.
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse. New York: Oxfoixl University Press.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1981). The folkslories of children. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Umiker-Sebeok, J. D. (1979). Preschool children's intraconversational narratives. Journal of Child Language 6(1): 91110.
Witkin, H., Faterson, F., Goodenough, R., & Birnbaum, J. (1966). Cognitive patterning in mildly retarded boys. Child Development 37 (2): 301–16.

What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school*

  • Shirley Brice Heath (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed