Skip to main content Accessibility help

Stance-taking and participation framework in museum commenting platforms: On subjects, objects, authors, and principals

  • Chaim Noy (a1) and Michal Hamo (a2)


The realization of subjectivity through language use is a key concern of sociolinguistic research. We argue for examining it by juxtaposing Goffman's participation framework and Du Bois’ stance triangle. We focus on museums’ commenting platforms as ‘stance-rich’ media (Du Bois 2007:151) by examining the communicative affordances of a visitor book at the Florida Holocaust Museum and analyzing museumgoers’ texts (3,064). These texts are homogeneous in their morally indignant evaluation of the Holocaust and their alignment with the museum, but heterogeneous in positioning and participation framework. Museumgoers’ texts are highly responsive to the setting and previous discourses of the museum and include patterns of shared authorship and principalship. These patterns allow museumgoers to construct shared, institutionally mandated, subjectivities while maintaining personal commitment. These findings contribute to our understanding of the construction of subjectivity as inherently dialogic, and as involving the purposeful use of a multiplicity of contextual resources. (Participation framework, stance triangle, repetitions, principalship, commitment, Holocaust, museums, visitor books)


Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Chaim Noy, School of Communication, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 5290002,


Hide All
Andermann, Jens, & Arnold-de Simine, Silke (2012). Introduction: Memory, community and the new museum. Theory, Culture & Society 29(1):313.
Barton, David, & Lee, Carmen (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. London: Routledge.
Bucholtz, Mary; Skapoulli, Elena; Barnwell, Brendan; & Janie Lee, Jung-Eun (2011). Entextualized humor in the formation of scientist identities among US undergraduates. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 42(3):177–92.
Davies, Bronwyn, & Harré, Rom (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(1):4363.
Dori-Hacohen, Gonen (2017). Creative resonance and misalignment stance: Achieving distance in one Hebrew interaction. Functions of Language 24(1):1640.
Du Bois, John W. (2007). The stance triangle. In Englebretson, 139–82.
Du Bois, John W., & Kärkkäinen, Elise (2012). Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk 32(4):433–51.
Englebretson, Robert (ed.) (2007). Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goffman, Erving (1961). Role distance. In Goffman, Erving, Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction, 85152. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Goffman, Erving (1981). Footing. In Goffman, Erving, Forms of talk, 124–59. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, Charles (2007a). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society 18(1):5373.
Goodwin, Charles (2007b). Interactive footing. In Holt, Elizabeth & Clift, Rebecca (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 1646. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2004). Participation. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 222–44. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Gruber, Helmut (2017). Quoting and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse. Discourse, Context & Media 20:19.
Hamo, Michal (2015). ‘I have nothing to do but agree’: Affiliative meta-discursive follow-ups as a resource for the reciprocal positioning of journalists, experts and politicians-as-experts in television news. In Weizman, Elda & Fetzer, Anita (eds.), Follow-ups in political discourse: Explorations across contexts and discourse domains, 5780. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heath, Christian, & Lehn, Dirk vom (2008). Configuring ‘interactivity’: Enhancing engagement in science centres and museums. Social Studies of Science 38(1):6391.
Herring, Susan C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah, & Hamilton, Heidi E. (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 612–34. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean (ed.) (1995/2013). Museum, media, message. London: Routledge.
Irvine, Judith (1996). Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In Silverstein, Michael & Urban, Greg (eds.), Natural histories of discourse, 131–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Iwasaki, Shoichi, & Yap, Foong H. (eds.) (2015). Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 83:19.
Jaffe, Alexandra (2009). Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jakobson, Roman (1957/1990). Shifters and verbal categories. In Waugh, Linda R. & Monville-Burston, Monique (eds.), On language, 386–92. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnstone, Barbara (ed.) (1994). Repetition in discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Kärkkäinen, Elise (2006). Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk 26(6):699731.
Kärkkäinen, Elise (2012). I thought it was very interesting: Conversational formats for taking a stance. Journal of Pragmatics 44:2194–210.
Katriel, Tamar (1997). Performing the past: A study of Israeli settlement museums. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kiesling, Scott F. (2011). Stance in context: Affect, alignment and investment in the analysis of stancetaking. Paper presented at the iMean 2 conference, Bristol, UK.
Knell, Simon J. (ed.) (2004). Museums and the future of collecting. 2nd edn. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Kockelman, Paul (2004). Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2):127–50.
Labov, William, & Waletzky, Joshua (1967/1997). Narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4):338.
Levinson, Stephen (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In Drew, Paul & Wootton, Anthony J. (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order, 161227. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Luke, Timothy (2002). Museum politics: Power plays at the exhibition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Macdonald, Sharon (2005). Accessing audiences: Visiting visitor books. Museum and Society 3(3):119–36.
Macdonald, Sharon (ed.) (2006). A companion to museum studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Myers, Greg (2010). Discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum.
Noy, Chaim (2009). ‘I WAS HERE!’: Addressivity structures and inscribing practices as indexical resources. Discourse Studies 11(4):421–40.
Noy, Chaim (2015). Thank you for dying for our country: Commemorative texts and performances in Jerusalem. New York: Oxford University Press.
Noy, Chaim (2016). Participatory media new and old: Semiotics and affordances of museum media. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 33(4):308–23.
Noy, Chaim (2017a). Participatory media and discourse in heritage museums: Co-constructing the public sphere? Communication, Culture & Critique 10(2):280301.
Noy, Chaim (2017b). Memory, media, and museum audience's discourse of remembering. Critical Discourse Studies 15(1):1938.
Russo, Angelina, & Watkins, Jerry (2007). Digital cultural communication: Audience and remediation. In Cameron, Fiona & Kenderdine, Sarah (eds.), Theorizing digital cultural heritage: A critical discourse, 149–64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Scollon, Ron (1995). Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse. Language in Society 24(1):128.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, & Aijmer, Karin (2007). The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stamou, Anastasia G., & Paraskevolpoulos, Stephanos (2003). Ecotourism experiences in visitors’ books of a Greek reserve: A critical discourse analysis perspective. Sociologia Ruralis 43(1):3455.
Taha, Maisa C. (2017). Shadow subjects: A category of analysis for empathic stancetaking. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27(2):190209.
Tanaka, Lidia (2009). Communicative stances in Japanese interviews: Gender differences in formal interactions. Language & Communication 29:366–82.
Tannen, Deborah (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Tannen, Deborah (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Gregory A. (2016). Temporality, stance ownership, and the constitution of subjectivity. Language & Communication 46:3141.
Thornborrow, Joanna (2001). Authenticating talk: Building public identities in audience participation broadcasting. Discourse Studies 3(4):459–79.
Thornborrow, Joanna (2015). The discourse of public participation media: From talk show to twitter. London: Routledge.
Thumim, Nancy (2009). ‘Everyone has a story to tell’: Mediation and self-representation in two UK institutions. International Journal of Cultural Studies 12:617–68.
Thumim, Nancy (2010). Self-representation in museums: Therapy or democracy? Critical Discourse Studies 7(4):291304.
Vukovic, Milica (2014). Strong epistemic modality in parliamentary discourse. Open Linguistics 1(1):3752.
Wortham, Stanton, & Reyes, Angela (2015). Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. London: Routledge.

Stance-taking and participation framework in museum commenting platforms: On subjects, objects, authors, and principals

  • Chaim Noy (a1) and Michal Hamo (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed