Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T12:40:52.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Jay L. Lemke, Textual Politics. London: Taylor & Francis, 1995. Pp. ix, 196. Hb $80.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

William Frawley
Affiliation:
Linguistics, University of DelawareNewark, DE 19716*

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bourdieu, Pierre (1990). La domination masculine. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 84: 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre & Wacquant, Loic (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Colapietro, Vincent (1989). Peirce's semiotics' semiotic approach to the self. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel (1991). Consciousness explained. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley (1988). Comments from outside economics. In Klamer, Arjo et al. (eds.), The consequences of economic rhetoric. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 2130.Google Scholar
Frawley, William (1995). Texts, disciplines, and metaconsciousness. Paper presented at the 15th Meeting of the Poetics and Linguistics Association, Granada, Spain.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom (1983). Personal being: A rationale for the natural sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marcus, George (1994). On ideologies of reflexivity in contemporary efforts to remake the human sciences. Poetics Today 15: 383404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar