References included in the meta-analysis are preceded by an asterisk (*).
Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). The framing of politics as strategy and game: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162–178.
*Abbarno, A. J., & Zapryanova, G. M. (2013). Indirect effects of Eurosceptic messages on citizen attitudes toward domestic politics. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(4), 581–597.
Ahrens, K. (2011). Examining conceptual worldviews though lexical frequency patterns: a case study of U.S. presidential speeches. In Handl, S. & Schmid, H. (Eds.), Windows to the mind: metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending (pp. 167–184). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.
Bechtel, M. M., Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Helbling, M. (2015). Reality bites: the limits of framing effects for salient and contested policy issues. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(3), 683–695.
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
Brugman, B. C., & Burgers, C. (2018). Political framing across disciplines: evidence from 21st century framing experiments. Research & Politics, 5(2), 1–7.
Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., & Steen, G. J. (2017). Recategorizing political frames: a systematic review of metaphorical framing in experiments on political communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 181–197.
Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative framing: shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole and irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430.
Chandler, J. J., Reinhard, D., & Schwarz, N. (2012). To judge a book by its weight you need to know its content: knowledge moderates the use of embodied cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 948–952.
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
*Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655.
Cienki, A. (2005). Metaphor in the ‘strict father’ and ‘nurturant parent’ cognitive models: theoretical issues raised in an empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2), 279–312.
Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2(4), 1–9.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
*Corner, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2015). Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Climatic Change, 130(3), 425–438.
Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29.
*D’Angelo, P., & Lombard, M. (2008). The power of the press: the effects of press frames in political campaign news on media perceptions. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 16(1), 1–32.
Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2010). Students as experimental participants: a defense of the ‘narrow data base’. In Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., & Lupia, A. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental political science (pp. 41–57). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463.
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Geise, S., & Baden, C. (2014). Putting the image back into the frame: modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory, 25(1), 46–69.
Holman, M. R. (2016). Gender, political rhetoric, and moral metaphors in state of the city addresses. Urban Affairs Review, 52(4), 501–530.
*Joris, W. (2016). De Eurocrisis in het nieuws: Een frameanalyse van de verslaggeving in Europese kranten en een effectenstudie van metaforische frames [The Eurocrisis in the news: a frame analysis of the news coverage in European newspapers and an effect study of metaphorical frames]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
*Kalmoe, N. P. (2014). Fueling the fire: violent metaphors, trait aggression, and support for political violence. Political Communication, 31(4), 545–563.
Krennmayr, T. (2013). Top-down versus bottom-up approaches to the identification of metaphor in discourse. Metaphorik.de, 24, 7–36.
Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: how liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by . Chicago: Chicago University Press.
*Landau, M. J., Keefer, L. A., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2014). Epistemic motives moderate the effect of metaphoric framing on attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 125–138.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Lee, S. W., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1423–1425.
Levine, T. R., Asada, K. J., & Carpenter, C. (2009). Sample sizes and effect sizes are negatively correlated in meta-analyses: evidence and implications of a publication bias against nonsignificant findings. Communication Monographs, 76(3), 286–302.
Machery, E. (2010). Explaining why experimental behavior varies across cultures: a missing step in ‘The weirdest people in the world?’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2/3), 101–102.
Moses, J. F., & Gonzales, M. H. (2015). Strong candidate, nurturant candidate: moral language in presidential television advertisements. Political Psychology, 36(4), 379–397.
Ohl, J. J., Pfister, D. S., Nader, M., & Griffin, D. (2013). Lakoff’s theory of moral reasoning in presidential campaign advertisements, 1952–2012. Communication Studies, 64(5), 488–507.
*Pingree, R. J., Hill, M., & McLeod, D. M. (2013). Distinguishing effects of game framing and journalistic adjudication on cynicism and epistemic political efficacy. Communication Research, 40(2), 193–214.
Polanin, J. R., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Hennessy, E. A. (2016). Estimating the difference between published and unpublished effect sizes: a meta-review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 207–236.
Renardel de Lavalette, K. Y. R., Steen, G. J., & Burgers, C. (in press). How to identify moral language in presidential speeches: a comparison between a social-psychological and a metaphorical-words framing to corpus analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. doi:10.1515/cllt-2016-0007
Robins, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). The metaphor framing effect: metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas. Discourse Processes, 30(1), 57–86.
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester: Wiley.
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., & Demmen, J. (2018). An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 625–645.
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534–547.
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: a meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419.
Steen, G. J. (2017). Deliberate metaphor theory: basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., & Krennmayr, T. (2010). Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 765–796.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: from MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS One, 9(12), e113536.
Thibodeau, P. H. (2016). Extended metaphors are the home runs of persuasion: don’t fumble the phrase. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(2), 53–72.
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: the role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS One, 6(2), e16782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Van Stee, S. K. (2018). Meta-analysis of the persuasive effects of metaphorical vs. literal messages. Communication Studies, 69(5), 545–566.
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606–607.