Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-846f6c7c4f-qmls6 Total loading time: 0.236 Render date: 2022-07-07T09:01:03.745Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

A research program in neuroimaging for an evolutionary theory of syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Marco Tettamanti*
Affiliation:
San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, I-20132 Milano, Italy E-mail: tettamanti.marco@hsr.it

Abstract

The Mirror System Hypothesis of Michael Arbib (2012), with respect to the cultural evolutionary origins of syntactic structure, allows to make a set of predictions about the neural mechanisms that govern the processing of modern human languages. Neuroimaging techniques may be employed to test these predictions and inform an evolutionary theory of language syntax. In this commentary, I will argue that future neuroimaging research needs in particular to: i) clarify whether linear sequential versus non-linear hierarchical structure differentially depend on mirror neurons as opposed to higher-order heteromodal cortices; ii) challenge current neuroscientific evidence on multilingualism: as it stands, syntactic processing appears to be mediated by the same neural mechanisms across languages, independently of cross-linguistic idiosyncrasies; iii) devise longitudinal studies of grammar acquisition in newborns and children; iv) recreate in the laboratory nearly-ecological conditions for the emergence of syntactic constructions through cultural and social interaction, and exploit the “experiment of nature” of pidgin and creole languages.

Type
Comparing the macaque and human brain
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abutalebi, J., Tettamanti, M. & Perani, D.. 2009. The bilingual brain: Linguistic and non-linguistic skills. Brain and Language 109(2–3). 5154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbib, M. A. 2012. How the brain got language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahlmann, J., Schubotz, R. I. & Friederici, A.D.. 2008. Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca's area. Neuroimage 42(2). 525534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannard, C., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M.. 2009. Modeling children's early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 106(41). 1728417289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baronchelli, A., Chater, N., Pastor-Satorras, R. & Christiansen, M. H.. 2012. The biological origin of linguistic diversity. PLoS ONE 7(10). e48029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene, S. & Cohen, L.. 2011. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(6). 254262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enrici, I., Adenzato, M., Cappa, S., Bara, B. G. & Tettamanti, M.. 2011. Intention processing in communication: A common brain network for language and gestures. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(9). 24152431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, A. D., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schubotz, R. I. & Anwander, A.. 2006. The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 103(7). 24582463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, A. D., Mueller, J. L. & Oberecker, R.. 2011. Precursors to natural grammar learning: preliminary evidence from 4-month-old infants. PLoS ONE 6(3). e17920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. & Rizzolatti, G.. 1996. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119(2). 593609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, L. M., Kuczaj, S. A. & Holder, M. D.. 1993. Responses to anomalous gestural sequences by a language-trained dolphin: Evidence for processing of semantic relations and syntactic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122(2). 184194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackendoff, R. 2003. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, K.H., Relkin, N.R., Lee, K.M. & Hirsch, J.. 1997. Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature 388(6638). 171174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musso, M., Moro, A., Glauche, V., Rijntjes, M., Reichenbach, J., Buchel, C. & Weiller, C.. 2003. Broca's area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience 6(7). 774781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, D. & Shallice, T.. 1986. Attention to action. In Davidson, R.J., Schwartz, G.E. & Shapiro, D. (eds.), Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 4, 118. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G.. 1992. Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research 91(1). 176180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perani, D. & Abutalebi, J.. 2005. The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15(2). 202206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrides, M., Cadoret, G. & Mackey, S.. 2005. Orofacial somatomotor responses in the macaque monkey homologue of Broca's area. Nature 435(7046). 12351238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrides, M. & Pandya, D. N.. 2009. Distinct parietal and temporal pathways to the homologues of Broca's area in the monkey. PLoS Biology 7(8). e1000170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulvermüller, F. & Fadiga, L.. 2010. Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(5). 351360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G. & Arbib, M.A.. 1998. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences 21(5). 188194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D. & Hahne, A.. 2006. The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(12). 20302048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saffran, J., Hauser, M., Seibel, R., Kapfhamer, J., Tsao, F. & Cushman, F.. 2008. Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Cognition 107(2). 479500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherwood, C. C., Broadfield, D. C., Holloway, R. L., Gannon, P. J. & Hof, P. R.. 2003. Variability of Broca's area homologue in African great apes: implications for language evolution. The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology 271(2). 276285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stobbe, N., Westphal-Fitch, G., Aust, U. & Fitch, W. T.. 2012. Visual artificial grammar learning: Comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 367(1598). 19952006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuss, D. T. & Knight, R. T.. 2002. Principles of frontal lobe function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tettamanti, M., Alkadhi, H., Moro, A., Perani, D., Kollias, S. & Weniger, D.. 2002. Neural correlates for the acquisition of natural language syntax. Neuroimage 17. 700709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tettamanti, M. & Moro, A.. 2012. Can syntax appear in a mirror (system)? Cortex 48(7). 923935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tettamanti, M. & Perani, D.. 2012. The neurobiology of structure-dependency in natural language grammar. In Faust, Miriam (ed.), Handbook of the neuropsychology of language, vol. 1, 229251. Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tettamanti, M. & Weniger, D.. 2006. Broca's area: A supramodal hierarchical processor? Cortex 42(4). 491494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wartenburger, I., Heekeren, H. R., Abutalebi, J., Cappa, S. F., Villringer, A. & Perani, D.. 2003. Early setting of grammatical processing in the bilingual brain. Neuron 37(1). 159170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber-Fox, C. M. & Neville, H. J.. 1996. Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: Erp and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8(3). 231256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A research program in neuroimaging for an evolutionary theory of syntax
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A research program in neuroimaging for an evolutionary theory of syntax
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A research program in neuroimaging for an evolutionary theory of syntax
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *