Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-9dmbd Total loading time: 0.239 Render date: 2021-02-28T04:55:14.921Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
The Knowledge Engineering Review The Knowledge Engineering Review

Article contents

Understanding Agent-Oriented Software Engineering methodologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2015

Jorge J. Gómez-Sanz  and
Rubén Fuentes-Fernández
Jorge J. Gómez-Sanz
Affiliation:
GRASIA Research Group, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain e-mail: jjgomez,ruben@fdi.ucm.es
Rubén Fuentes-Fernández
Affiliation:
GRASIA Research Group, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain e-mail: jjgomez,ruben@fdi.ucm.es
Corresponding
E-mail address:
jjgomez,ruben@fdi.ucm.es
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For many years, the progress in agent-oriented development has focused on tools and methods for particular development phases. This has not been enough for the industry to accept agent technology as we expected. Our hypothesis is that the Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE) community has not recognized the kind of development methods that industry actually demands. We propose to analyze this hypothesis starting with a more precise definition of what an AOSE methodology should be. This definition is the first step for a review of the current progress of an illustrative selection of methodologies, looking for missing elements and future lines of improvement. The result is an account of how well the AOSE community is meeting the software lifecycle needs. It can be advanced that AOSE methodologies are far from providing all the answers industry requires and that effort has grounded mainly in requirements, design, and implementation phases.

Type
Articles
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 30 , Special Issue 4: Challenges in Agent-Oriented Software Engineering , September 2015 , pp. 375 - 393
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Abran, A., Bourque, P., Dupuis, R., Moore, J. W. & Tripp, L. L. (eds) 2004. Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge—SWEBOK, IEEE Press. http://www.swebok.org.Google Scholar
Aldewereld, H. & Dignum, V. 2010. OperettA: organization-oriented development environment. In LADS, Dastani, M., Fallah-Seghrouchni, A. E., Hübner, J., Leite, J. (eds), LNCS, 6822, 1–18. Springer.Google Scholar
Argente, E., Beydoun, G., Fuentes-Fernández, R., Henderson-Sellers, B. & Low, G. 2011a. Modelling with Agents. In AOSE X, Gleizes, M. P., Gómez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 6038, 157–168. Springer.Google Scholar
Argente, E., Botti, V. J. & Julián, V. 2011b. GORMAS: an organizational-oriented methodological guideline for Open MAS. In AOSE X, Gleizes, M. P., Gómez-Sanz, J. J. (eds), LNCS, 6038, 32–47. Springer.Google Scholar
Argente, E., Julián, V. & Botti, V. J. 2008. MAS modeling based on organizations. In AOSE IX, Luck, M., Gómez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 5386, 16–30. Springer.Google Scholar
Bernon, C., Camps, V., Gleizes, M. P. & Picard, G. 2005. Multi-agent systems: the ADELFE methodology. In Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Henderson-Sellers, B. & Giorgini, P. (eds), Idea Group Publishing, Ch. VII. 172–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertolini, D., Delpero, L., Mylopoulos, J., Novikau, A., Orler, A., Penserini, L., Perini, A., Susi, A. & Tomasi, B. 2006. A Tropos model-driven development environment. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Boudjlida, N., Cheng, D., Guelfi, N. (eds), 231. CAiSE Forum. CEUR-WS.org.Google Scholar
Brinkkemper, S. 1996. Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology 38, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caire, G., Cossentino, M., Negri, A., Poggi, A. & Turci, P. 2004. Multi-agent systems implementation and testing. In Proceedings of 4th International Symposium From Agent Theory to Agent Implementation (AT2AI-4).Google Scholar
Cervenka, R., Greenwood, D. A. P. & Trencanský, I. 2006a. The AML approach to modeling autonomic systems. In 2006 International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (ICAS ’06). IEEE Computer Society, 29.Google Scholar
Cervenka, R., Trencanský, I. & Calisti, M. 2006b. Modeling social aspects of multi-agent systems: the AML approach. In AOSE VI, Müller, J. P., Zambonelli, F. (eds), LNCS, 3950, 28–39. Springer.Google Scholar
CMMI Product Team. 2002. Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMISM) v. 1.1. Tech. Rep., Carnegie Mellon, Software Engineering Institute.Google Scholar
Cossentino, M. 2005. From requirements to code with the PASSI methodology. In Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Henderson-Sellers, B. & Giorgini, P. (eds), Idea Group Publishing, Ch. IV. 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossentino, M., Gleizes, M. P., Molesini, A. & Omicini, A. 2011. Processes engineering and AOSE. In AOSE X, Gleizes, M. P., Gomez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 6038, 191–212. Springer.Google Scholar
Cossentino, M., Sabatucci, L. & Chella, A. 2003. A possible approach to the development of robotic multi-agent systems. In IEEE/WIC International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT’03), 539–544.Google Scholar
DeLoach, S. A. & Kumar, M. 2005. Multi-agent systems engineering: an overview and case study. In Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Henderson-Sellers, B. & Giorgini, P. (eds), Idea Group Publishing, Ch. XI. 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLoach, S. A. & Wood, M. F. 2000. Developing multiagent systems with agentTool. In ATAL, Castelfranchi, C., Lespérance, Y. (eds), LNCS, 1986, 46–60. Springer.Google Scholar
Dix, J., Hindriks, K. V., Logan, B. & Wobcke, W. 2012. Dagstuhl Seminar on Engineering Multi-Agent Systems. http://www.dagstuhl.de/en/program/calendar/semhp/?semnr=12342.Google Scholar
El Fallah-Seghrouchni, A., Gómez-Sanz, J. & Singh, M. 2011. Formal methods in agent-oriented software engineering. In AOSE X, Gleizes, M. P., Gómez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 6038, 213–228. Springer.Google Scholar
Ferber, J. & Gutknecht, O. 1998. A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems. In ICMAS, Demazeau, Y. (ed.), IEEE Computer Society, 128–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, R., Gómez-Sanz, J. J. & Pavón, J. 2006. Requirements elicitation for agent-based applications. In AOSE VI, Müller, J. P., Zambonelli, F. (eds), LNCS, 3950, 40–53. Springer.Google Scholar
Fuxman, A., Mylopoulos, J., Pistore, M. & Traverso, P. 2001. Model checking early requirements specifications in Tropos. In Proceedings of 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE 2001), 174–181.Google Scholar
García, E., Argente, E. & Giret, A. 2010. EMFGormas: a CASE tool for developing service-oriented open MAS. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2010), van der Hoek, W., Kaminka, G. A., Lespérance, Y., Luck, M., Sen, S. (eds), 1. IFAAMAS, 1623–1624.Google Scholar
García-Magariño, I., Gómez-Sanz, J. J. & Pérez-Agüera, J. R. 2008. A multi-agent based implementation of a Delphi process. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2008), Padgham, L., Parkes, D. C., Müller, J. P., Parsons, S. (eds), 3. IFAAMAS, 1543–1546.Google Scholar
García-Ojeda, J. C., DeLoach, S. A. & Robby., 2009. agentTool III: from process definition to code generation. In Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2009), Sierra, C., Castelfranchi, C., Decker, K. S., Sichman, J. S. (eds), 2. IFAAMAS, 1393–1394.Google Scholar
Garijo, F. J., Gómez-Sanz, J. J. & Massonet, P. 2005. The MESSAGE methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. In Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Henderson-Sellers, B. & Giorgini, P. (eds), Idea Group Publishing, Ch. VIII. 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgeff, M. P. 2009. The gap between software engineering and multi-agent systems: bridging the divide. IJAOSE 3, 391–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgini, P., Kolp, M., Mylopoulos, J. & Castro, J. 2005a. Tropos: a requirements-driven methodology for agent-oriented software. In Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Henderson-Sellers, B. & Giorgini, P. (eds), Idea Group Publishing, Ch. II. 20–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J. & Sebastiani, R. 2005b. Goal-oriented requirements analysis and reasoning in the tropos methodology. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 18, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Sanz, J. J. 2007. INGENIAS Agent Framework: Development Guide, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. http://sourceforge.net/projects/ingenias/files/INGENIAS%20Development%20Kit/Aranjuez/IAFDevelopmentGuide.pdf/download.Google Scholar
Gómez-Sanz, J. J., Bota-Blaya, J. A., Serrano, E. & Pavón, J 2009. Testing and debugging of MAS interactions with INGENIAS. In AOSE IX, Luck, M., Gómez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 5386, 199–212. Springer.Google Scholar
Gómez-Sanz, J. J., Fernández, C. R. & Arroyo, J. 2010. Model driven development and simulations with the INGENIAS agent framework. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 18, 1468–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Sanz, J. J., Fuentes, R., Pavón, J. & García-Magariño, I. 2008. INGENIAS development kit: a visual multi-agent system development environment. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2008), Demo Proceedings. IFAAMAS, 1675–1676.Google Scholar
Gómez-Sanz, J. J. & Pavón, J. 2002. Meta-modelling in Agent Oriented Software Engineering. In IBERAMIA, Garijo, F. J., Santos, J. C. R., Toro, M. (eds), LNCS, 2527, 606–615. Springer.Google Scholar
Gómez-Sanz, J. J. & Pavón, J. 2005. Implementing multi-agent systems organizations with INGENIAS. In PROMAS, Bordini, R. H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Fallah-Seghrouchni, A. E. (eds), LNCS, 3862, 236–251. Springer.Google Scholar
Gómez-Sanz, J. J., Pavón, J. & Garijo, F. J. 2005. Estimating costs for Agent Oriented Software. In AOSE, Müller, J. P., Zambonelli, F. (eds), LNCS, 3950, 218–230. Springer.Google Scholar
Gorodetsky, V., Karsaev, O., Samoilov, V. & Konushy, V. 2008. Support for analysis, design, and implementation stages with MASDK. In AOSE IX, Luck, M., Gómez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 5386, 272–287. Springer.Google Scholar
Graja, Z., Regayeg, A. & Kacem, A. H. 2010. ForMAAD: towards a model driven approach for agent based application design. In AOSE XI, Weyns, D., Gleizes, M. P. (eds), LNCS, 6788, 148–164. Springer.Google Scholar
Hahn, C. & Fischer, K. 2008. The formal semantics of the domain specific modeling language for multiagent systems. In AOSE IX, Luck, M., Gómez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 5386, 145–158. Springer.Google Scholar
Hahn, C., Zinnikus, I., Warwas, S. & Fischer, K. 2009. From agent interaction protocols to executable code: a model-driven approach. In Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2009), Sierra, C., Castelfranchi, C., Decker, K. S., Sichman, J. S. (eds), 2. IFAAMAS, 1199–1200.Google Scholar
Henderson-Sellers, B. & Giorgini, P. (eds) 2005. Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Idea Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEEE. 1990. IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology. IEEE Std 610, 121990.Google Scholar
Iglesias, C. A., Garijo, M., Centeno-González, J. & Velasco, J. R. 1997. Analysis and design of multiagent systems using MAS-Common KADS. In ATAL, Singh, M. P., Rao, A. S., Wooldridge, M. (eds), LNCS, 1365, 313–327. Springer.Google Scholar
Kacem, A. H., Regayeg, A. & Jmaiel, M. 2007. ForMAAD: a formal method for agent-based application design. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems 5, 435–454.Google Scholar
Kelly, S., Lyytinen, K. & Rossi, M. 1996. MetaEdit+: a fully configurable multi-user and multi-tool CASE and CAME environment. In CAiSE, Constantopoulos, P., Mylopoulos, J., Vassiliou, Y. (eds), LNCS, 1080, 1–21. Springer.Google Scholar
Kendall, E. A. 1999. Role modeling for agent system analysis, design, and implementation. In Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Mobile Agents/Agent Systems and Applications (ASA/MA 1999). IEEE Computer Society, 204–218.Google Scholar
Lethbridge, T. C. 2000. What knowledge is important to a software professional? Computer 33, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, M., McBurney, P., Shehory, O. & Willmott, S. 2005. Agent technology: computing as interaction (a roadmap for agent based computing). AgentLink, http://www.agentlink.org/roadmap.Google Scholar
Luck, M. & Padgham, L. (eds) 2008. Agent-Oriented Software Engineering VIII, LNCS, 4951. Springer.Google Scholar
Massonet, P., Deville, Y. & Nève, C. 2002. From AOSE methodology to agent implementation. In Proceedings of 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002). ACM, 27–34.Google Scholar
Morandini, M., Nguyen, D. C., Perini, A., Siena, A. & Susi, A. 2008. Tool-supported development with Tropos: The Conference Management System Case Study. In AOSE VIII, Luck, M., Padgham, L. (eds), LNCS, 4951, 182–196. Springer.Google Scholar
Naur, P. & Randell, B. (eds) 1968. Software Engineering, report on a conference sponsored by the NATO SCience Committee. NATO, Science Affairs Division from NATO.Google Scholar
Nguyen, C. D., Perini, A. & Tonella, P. 2010. Goal-oriented testing for MASs. International Journal of Agent Oriented Software Engineering 4, 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, I., Cirilo, E., de Lucena, C., Sudeikat, J., Hahn, C. & Gómez-Sanz, J. 2011. A survey on the implementation of agent oriented specifications. In AOSE X, Gleizes, M. P., Gomez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 6038, 169–179. Springer.Google Scholar
Object Management Group. 2008. Software and Systems Process Engineering Metamodel Specification (SPEM) 2.0.Google Scholar
Padgham, L., Thangarajah, J. & Winikoff, M. 2008. The Prometheus design tool—A Conference Management System Case Study. In AOSE VIII, Luck, M., Padgham, L. (eds), LNCS, 4951, 197–211. Springer.Google Scholar
Padgham, L. & Winikoff, M. 2004. Developing Intelligent Agent Systems: A Practical Guide, John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgham, L. & Winikoff, M. 2005. Prometheus: a practical agent-oriented methodology. In Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Henderson-Sellers, B. & Giorgini, P. (eds), Idea Group Publishing, Ch. V. 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnas, D. L. 1999. Software engineering programs are not computer science programs. IEEE Software 16, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulk, M., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. & Weber, C. 1993. Capability maturity model v. 1.1. Software, IEEE 10, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavón, J. & Gómez-Sanz, J. J. 2003. Agent oriented software engineering with INGENIAS. In CEEMAS, Mark, V., Müller, J. P., Pechoucek, M. (eds), LNCS, 2691, 394–403. Springer.Google Scholar
Pavón, J., Gómez-Sanz, J. J. & Fuentes, R. 2005. The INGENIAS methodology and tools. In Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Henderson-Sellers, B. & Giorgini, P. (eds), Idea Group Publishing, Ch. IX. 236–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavón, J., Gómez-Sanz, J. J. & Fuentes, R. 2006. Model driven development of multi-agent systems. In ECMDA-FA, Rensink, A.,Warmer, J. (eds), LNCS, 4066, 284–298. Springer.Google Scholar
Regayeg, A., Kacem, A. H. & Jmaiel, M. 2004. Specification and design of multi-agent applications using Temporal Z. In PRIMA, Barley, M., Kasabov, N. K. (eds), LNCS, 3371, 228–242. Springer.Google Scholar
Rougemaille, S., Arcangeli, J. P., Gleizes, M. P. & Migeon, F. 2008. ADELFE design, AMAS-ML in action. In ESAW, Artikis, A., Picard, G., Vercouter, L. (eds), LNCS, 5485, 105–120. Springer.Google Scholar
Sabatucci, L., Cossentino, M. & Gaglio, S. 2006. Building agents with agents and patterns. In WOA, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Paoli, F. D., Stefano, A. D., Omicini, A., Santoro, C. (eds), 204. CEUR-WS.org.Google Scholar
Seidita, V., Cossentino, M. & Gaglio, S. 2009. Using and extending the SPEM specifications to represent agent oriented methodologies. In AOSE IX, Luck, M., Gómez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 5386, 46–59. Springer.Google Scholar
Sierra, C., Castelfranchi, C., Decker, K. S. & Sichman, J. S. (eds) 2009. 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2009), 2. IFAAMAS.Google Scholar
Spanoudakis, N. I. & Moraitis, P. 2008. The Agent Modeling Language (AMOLA). In AIMSA, Dochev, D., Pistore, M., Traverso, P. (eds), LNCS, 5253, 32–44. Springer.Google Scholar
Spanoudakis, N. I. & Moraitis, P. 2010. Modular JADE agents design and implementation using ASEME. In IAT, Huang, J. X., Ghorbani, A. A., Hacid, M.-S. & Yamaguchi, T. (eds), IEEE Computer Society Press, 221–228.Google Scholar
Spanoudakis, N. I. & Moraitis, P. 2011. Using ASEME methodology for model-driven agent systems development. In AOSE XI, Weyns, D., Gleizes, M. P. (eds), LNCS, 6788, 106–127. Springer.Google Scholar
Sturm, A. & Shehory, O. 2003. A framework for evaluating agent-oriented methodologies. In AOIS, Giorgini, P., Henderson-Sellers, B., Winikoff, M. (eds), LNCS, 3030, 94–109. Springer.Google Scholar
Sun, H., Thangarajah, J. & Padgham, L. 2010. Eclipse-based Prometheus Design Tool. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2010), van der Hoek, W., Kaminka, G. A., Lespérance, Y., Luck, M., Sen, S. (eds), 1. IFAAMAS, 1769–1770.Google Scholar
van Putten, B. J., Dignum, V., Sierhuis, M. & Wolfe, S. R. 2009. OperA and Brahms: a symphony? In AOSE IX, Luck, M., Gómez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 5386, 257–271. Springer.Google Scholar
Warwas, S. & Hahn, C. 2009. The DSML4MAS development environment. In Proceedings of 8th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2009), Sierra, C., Castelfranchi, C., Decker, K. S., Sichman, J. S. (eds), 2. IFAAMAS, 1379–1380.Google Scholar
Weyns, D. 2010. Architecture-Based Design of Multi-Agent Systems, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, E. S. K. 1997. Towards modeling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In 3rd {IEEE} International Symposium on Requirements Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N. R. & Wooldridge, M. 2005. Multi-agent systems as computational organizations: the Gaia methodology. In Agent-Oriented Methodologies, Henderson-Sellers, B. & Giorgini, P. (eds), Idea Group Publishing, Ch. VI. 136–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Thangarajah, J. & Padgham, L. 2011. Automated testing for intelligent agent systems. In AOSE X, Gleizes, M.-P., Gómez-Sanz, J. (eds), LNCS, 6038, 66–79. Springer.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 202 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

16 Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Understanding Agent-Oriented Software Engineering methodologies
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Understanding Agent-Oriented Software Engineering methodologies
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Understanding Agent-Oriented Software Engineering methodologies
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *