Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:00:21.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reality in-itself and the Ground of Causality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2019

Christian Onof
Christian Onof*
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
*
Email: c.onof@philosophy.bbk.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a metaphysical approach to the interpretation of the role of things-in-themselves in Kant’s theoretical philosophy. This focuses upon identifying their transcendental function as the grounding of appearances. It is interpreted as defining the relation of appearing as the grounding of empirical causality. This leads to a type of dual-aspect account that is given further support through a detailed examination of two sections of Kant’s first Critique. This shows the need to embed this dual-aspect account within a two-perspective framework. The resulting picture is contrasted with the main rival theories and objections are addressed.

Keywords

things-in-themselvesnoumenatranscendental objectaffectioncausality
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 197 - 222
Copyright
© Kantian Review, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. (1997) ‘Things in Themselves’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57(4), 801–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adickes, E. (1924) Kant und das Ding an Sich. Berlin: Pan Verlag Rolf Heisse.Google Scholar
Allais, L. (2006) ‘Intrinsic Natures: A Critique of Langton on Kant’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(1), 143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, L. (2007) ‘Kant’s Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45(3), 459–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, L. (2015) Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, H. (1983) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, H. (2004) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense (2nd edition). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, K. (2000) Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, K. (2003) Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquila, R. E. (1979) ‘Things in Themselves and Appearances: Intentionality and Reality in Kant’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 61, 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquila, R. E. (1981) ‘Intentional Objects and Kantian Appearances’. Philosophical Topics, 12(2), 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (1974) Kant’s Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, G. (2006) The Revolutionary Kant. A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason. New York: Open Court.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. (2015) ‘Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism’. In Alter, T. and Nagasawa, Y. (eds), Consciousness in the Physical World. Perspectives on Russellian Monism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 246–76.Google Scholar
Chiba, K. (2012) Kants Ontologie der Raumzeitlichen Wirklichkeit. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S. (1999) Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goff, P. (2017) Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. (1987) Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, D. (2009) ‘Noumenal Affection’. Philosophical Review, 118(4), 501–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, F. H. (1994) ‘On Transcendental Idealism’. In di Giovanni, G. (trans.), The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel (Montreal and Kingston: McGill and Queen’s University Press), pp. 331–8.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1950) Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Trans. L. W. Beck, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1959) Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. L. W. Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1987) Critique of Judgment. Trans. W. S. Pluhar, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1997) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, R. (1998) Kantian Humility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. (2013) ‘Kant’s Appearances and Things in Themselves as Qua-Objects’. Philosophical Quarterly, 63(252), 520–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onof, C. (2008) ‘Property Dualism, Epistemic Normativity and the Limits of Naturalism’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76(1), 60–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onof, C (2011) ‘Thinking the In-Itself and its Relation to Appearances’. In Schulting, D. and Verburgt, J. (eds), Kant’s Idealism: New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 211–36.Google Scholar
Prauss, G. (1974) Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. (1994) ‘Two Perspectives on Kant’s Appearances and Things in Themselves’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 32(3), 411–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosefeldt, T. (2007) ‘Dinge an sich und sekundäre Qualitäten’. In Stolzenberg, J. (ed.), Kant in der Gegenwart (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 167–212.Google Scholar
Schulting, D. (2017a) Kant’s Radical Subjectivism. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulting, D. (2017b) ‘Kant’s Idealism and Phenomenalism Critical Notice of Lucy Allais’. Studi Kantiani, 30, 191–202.Google Scholar
Senderowicz, Y. (2005) The Coherence of Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Stang, N. (2014) ‘The Non-Identity of Appearances and Things in Themselves’. Nous, 48(1), 106–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stang, N. (2015) ‘Who’s Afraid of Double Affection?’. Philosophers’ Imprint, 15(18), 1–28.Google Scholar
Watkins, E. (2005) Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. (2004) Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar