Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:54:23.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Morality: Replies to Pollok, Bojanowski and Louden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Frederick Rauscher
Frederick Rauscher*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
*
Email: rauscher@msu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Author Meets Critics
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 495 - 507
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2013) ‘Naturalism and Kant’s Resolution of the Third Antinomy’. In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca and Margit Ruffing (eds), Proceedings of the XI International Kant Congress: Kant and Philosophy in a Cosmopolitan Sense (Berlin: De Gruyter), vol. 3, pp. 731–742.Google Scholar