Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:23:34.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Do Distilleries Produce Multiple Ages of Whisky?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2019

Ian B. Page Open the ORCID record for Ian B. Page [Opens in a new window]
Ian B. Page*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Symons Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; e-mail: ibpage@umd.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vintage goods are a unique set of goods that accrue value over time. Unlike producers for many other vintage goods, Scottish distilleries often mature their stocks to different ages and sell a product line that varies significantly in quality. This article develops a theoretical model to examine this maturation strategy and identify market conditions under which a distillery would produce multiple ages of whisky. An empirical analysis of distilleries’ product lines confirms results from the model and highlights the determinants of variety and substitutability between brands. (JEL Classifications: D43, L13, L66)

Keywords

dynamic productionmaturationproduct varietyvintage goodswhiskeywhisky
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 26 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank Erik Lichtenberg, the anonymous referee, the journal editor, and the participants at the Annual AAWE Conference in Walla Walla, Washington for their useful comments. All remaining errors are my own.

References

Alexander, P. J. (1997). Product variety and market structure: A new measure and a simple test. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 32(2), 207–214.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O. (2008). Predicting the quality and prices of Bordeaux wine. Economic Journal, 118(529), F174–F184.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O., and Hosken, D. (2010). The effect of mergers on consumer prices: Evidence from five mergers on the enforcement margin. Journal of Law and Economics, 53(3), 417–466.Google Scholar
Berry, S. T., and Waldfogel, J. (2001). Do mergers increase product variety? Evidence from radio broadcasting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 1009–1025.Google Scholar
Carlton, D. W., and Dana, J. D. Jr. (2008). Product variety and demand uncertainty: Why markups vary with quality. Journal of Industrial Economics, 56(3), 535–552.Google Scholar
Chen, C.-M., Yeh, C.-Y., and Hu, J.-L. (2011). Influence of uncertain demand on product variety: Evidence from the international tourist hotel industry in Taiwan. Tourism Economics, 17(6), 1275–1285.Google Scholar
De Fraja, G. (1996). Product line competition in vertically differentiated markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(3), 389–414.Google Scholar
Draganska, M., and Jain, D. C. (2005). Product-line length as a competitive tool. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Draganska, M., Mazzeo, M., and Seim, K. (2009). Beyond plain vanilla: Modeling joint product assortment and pricing decisions. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 7(2), 105–146.Google Scholar
Gandhi, A., Froeb, L., Tschantz, S., and Werden, G. J. (2008). Post-merger product repositioning. Journal of Industrial Economics, 56(1), 49–67.Google Scholar
Goodhue, R. E., LaFrance, J. T., and Simon, L. K. (2009). Wine taxes, production, aging and quality. Journal of Wine Economics, 4(1), 65–83.Google Scholar
Jaeger, E. (1981). To save or savor: The rate of return to storing wine. Journal of Political Economy, 89(3), 584–592.Google Scholar
Klemperer, P. (1992). Equilibrium product lines: Competing head-to-head may be less competitive. American Economic Review, 82(4), 740–755.Google Scholar
Krasker, W. S. (1979). The rate of return to storing wines. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1363–1367.Google Scholar
Mazzeo, M. J. (2002). Product choice and oligopoly market structure. RAND Journal of Economics, 33(2), 221–242.Google Scholar
Piggott, J. R., and Jardine, S. P. (1979). Descriptive sensory analysis of whisky flavor. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 85(2), 82–85.Google Scholar
Ronde, I. (ed.). (2012). Malt Whisky Yearbook 2013. Shrewsbury, England: MagDig Media.Google Scholar
Salo, S., and Tahvonen, O. (2002). On equilibrium cycles and normal forests in optimal harvesting of tree vintages. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Salo, S., and Tahvonen, O. (2003). On the economics of forest vintages. Journal of Environmental Dynamics & Control, 27(8), 1411–1435.Google Scholar
Siebert, R. (2015). Entering new markets in the presence of competition: Price discrimination versus cannibalization. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), 369–389.Google Scholar
Sweeting, A. (2010). The effects of mergers on product positioning: Evidence from the music radio industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 41(2), 372–397.Google Scholar
Watson, R. (2009). Product variety and competition in the retail market for eyeglasses. Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(2), 217–251.Google Scholar
Wohlgenant, M. K. (1982). Inventory adjustment and dynamic winery behavior. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(2), 222–231.Google Scholar