Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Salinity constrains size inequality and allometry in two contrasting mangrove habitats in the Gulf of Mexico

  • Rodrigo Méndez-Alonzo (a1), Humberto Hernández-Trejo (a2) and Jorge López-Portillo (a3)

Abstract:

The competition for resources increases size inequality in trees, particularly under low abiotic stress. Because mangrove communities are subject to site-specific salinity (and therefore abiotic stress) gradients, these habitats should differ in height–diameter allometry and size inequality. The size inequality (by the Gini Coefficient, G) and maximum potential height (Hmax from a height–diameter asymptotic model) were determined within the mangrove forest of a coastal lagoon in Veracruz, Mexico in 20 0.25-ha plots, 10 in interdistributary basins (IBs, lower salinity) having Avicennia germinans, Laguncularia racemosa and Rhizophora mangle and 10 in mudflats (MFs, higher salinity) dominated by A. germinans. Size inequality was significantly higher in IBs (G = 0.59 ± 0.02 vs. 0.39 ± 0.03). Due to their significant intercorrelation G, total basal area and density were synthesized in one PCA axis accounting for 67% of total variance and inversely correlated with salinity (R = −0.65, P = 0.003). The height–diameter scaling model reached a stable asymptote (Hmax range: 16–21 m; coefficient of variation CV: 7.7) in IBs, suggesting that trees can still increase their diameter after achieving maximum height. In MFs, no stable asymptote was reached (Hmax range: 11–26 m; CV: 32.5), suggesting a lower growth rate of diameter in the MF trees when compared with IB trees.

Copyright

Corresponding author

1Corresponding author. Email: jorge.lopez.portillo@inecol.edu.mx

References

Hide All
AUSTIN, M. P. 1985. Continuum concept, ordination methods and niche theory. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:3961.
BAGCHI, S. 2007. Relationship between size hierarchy and density of trees in a tropical dry deciduous forest of western India. Journal of Vegetation Science 18:389394.
BAUER, S., WYSZOMIRSKI, T., BERGER, U., HILDENBRANDT, H. & GRIMM, V. 2004. Asymmetric competition as a natural outcome of neighbour interactions among plants: results from the field-of-neighbourhood modelling approach. Plant Ecology 170:135145.
CORLETT, R. T. 1986. The mangrove understory: some additional observations. Journal of Tropical Ecology 2:9394.
DAMGAARD, C. & WEINER, J. 2000. Describing inequality in plant size or fecundity. Ecology 81:11391142.
FALSTER, D. S. & WESTOBY, M. 2003. Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:337343.
GLANTZ, S. A. 2005. Primer of biostatistics. (Sixth edition). McGraw Hill Professional, New York. 490 pp.
HERNÁNDEZ-TREJO, H. 2009. Efecto de las perturbaciones naturales y antropógenas en la estructura del manglar de La Mancha, Veracruz. Ph.D. dissertation, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., México. 115 pp.
HIKOSAKA, K. & HIROSE, T. 2001. Nitrogen uptake and use by competing individuals in a Xanthium canadense stand. Oecologia 126:174181.
HUCKLE, J. M., POTTER, J. A. & MARRS, R. H. 2000. Influence of environmental factors on the growth and interactions between salt marsh plants: effects of salinity, sediment and waterlogging. Journal of Ecology 88:492505.
JANZEN, D. H. 1985. Mangroves: where's the understorey? Journal of Tropical Ecology 1:8992.
KOCH, G. W., SILLETT, S. C., JENNINGS, G. M. & DAVIS, S. D. 2004. The limits to tree height. Nature 428:851854.
KUMARA, M. P., JAYATISSA, L. P., KRAUSS, K. W., PHILLIPS, D. H. & HUXMAN, M. 2010. High mangrove density enhances surface accretion, surface elevation change, and tree survival in coastal areas susceptible to sea-level rise. Oecologia 164:545553.
LÓPEZ-HOFFMAN, L., ANTEN, N. P. R., MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS, M. & ACKERLY, D. D. 2007. Salinity and light interactively affect neotropical mangrove seedlings at the leaf and whole plant levels. Oecologia 150:545556.
LÓPEZ-PORTILLO, J. & EZCURRA, E. 1989. Response of three mangroves to salinity in two geoforms. Functional Ecology 3:355361.
LUGO, A. E. 1980. Mangrove ecosystems: successional or steady state? Biotropica 12:6572.
LUGO, A. E. & SNEDAKER, S. C. 1974. The ecology of mangroves. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5:3964.
MARQUARDT, D. W. 1963. An algorithm for least squares estimation of parameters. Journal of the Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics 11:431441.
MÉNDEZ-ALONZO, R., LÓPEZ-PORTILLO, J. & RIVERA-MONROY, V. H. 2008. Latitudinal variation in leaf and tree traits of the mangrove Avicennia germinans (Avicenniaceae) in the central region of the Gulf of Mexico. Biotropica 40:449456.
MÉNDEZ-LINARES, A. P., LÓPEZ-PORTILLO, J., HERNÁNDEZ-SANTANA, J. R., ORTIZ-PÉREZ, M. A. & OROPEZA-OROZCO, O. 2007. The mangrove communities in the Arroyo Seco deltaic fan, Jalisco, Mexico, and their relation with the geomorphic and physical-geographic zonation. Catena 27:127142.
MOLES, A. T., WARTON, D. I., WARMAN, L., SWENSON, N. G., LAFFAN, S. W., ZANNE, A. E., PITMAN, A., HEMMINGS, F. A. & LEISHMAN, M. R. 2009. Global patterns in tree height. Journal of Ecology 97:923932.
NAGASHIMA, N., TERASHIMA, I. & KHATO, S. 1995. Effects of plant density on height distributions in Chenopodium album stands: analysis based on continuous monitoring of height growth of individual plants. Annals of Botany 75:173180.
NAIDOO, G. 2006. Factors contributing to dwarfing in the mangrove Avicennia marina. Annals of Botany 97:10951101.
NAIDOO, G. 2010. Ecophysiological differences between fringe and dwarf Avicennia marina mangroves. Trees – Structure and Function 24:667673.
NIKLAS, K. J. & SPATZ, H. C. 2004. Growth and hydraulic (not mechanical) constraints govern the scaling of tree height and mass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101:1566115663.
NORD-LARSEN, T., DAMGAARD, C. & WEINER, J. 2006. Quantifying size-asymmetric growth among individual beech trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:418425.
POORTER, L., HAWTHORNE, W., BONGERS, F. & SHEIL, D. 2008. Maximum size distributions in tropical tree communities: relationships with rainfall and disturbance. Journal of Ecology 96:495504.
RYAN, M. J. & YODER, B. J. 1997. Hydraulic limits to tree height and growth. Bioscience 47:235242.
SCOTT, D. W. 1979. On optimal and data-based histograms. Biometrika 66:605610.
SCHWINNING, S. & WEINER, J. 1998. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113:447455.
SHERMAN, R. E., FAHEY, T. J. & BATTLES, J. J. 2000. Small-scale disturbance and regeneration dynamics in a neotropical mangrove forest. Journal of Ecology 88:165178.
SONE, K., SUZUKI, A. A., MIYAZAWA, S. I., NOGUCHI, K. & TERASHIMA, I. 2009. Maintenance mechanisms of the pipe model relationship and Leonardo da Vinci's rule in the branching architecture of Acer rufinerve trees. Journal of Plant Research 122:4152.
THOM, B. G. 1967. Mangrove ecology and deltaic geomorphology: Tabasco, Mexico. Journal of Ecology 55:301342.
THOMAS, S. C. 1996. Asymptotic height as predictor of growth and allometric characteristics in Malaysian rainforests. American Journal of Botany 83:556566.
TURNER, I. M., GONG, W. K., ONG, J. E., BUJANG, J. S. & KOHYAMA, T. 1995. The architecture and allometry of mangrove saplings. Functional Ecology 9:205212.
TWILLEY, R. R. & RIVERA-MONROY, V. H. 2009. Ecogeomorphic models of nutrient biogeochemistry for mangrove wetlands. Pp. 641–683 in Perillo, G. M. E., Wolanski, E., Cahoon, D. R. & Brinson, M. M. (eds.). Coastal wetlands: an integrated ecosystem approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
VAN KUIJK, M., ANTEN, N. P. R., OOMEN, R. J., VAN BENTUM, D. W. & WERGER, M. J. A. 2008. The limited importance of size-asymmetric light competition and growth of pioneer species in early secondary forest succession in Vietnam. Oecologia 157:112.
WEINER, J. 1990. Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:360364.
WEINER, J. & FRECKLETON, R. P. 2010. Constant final yield. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 41:173192.
WEINER, J. & SOLBRIG, O. 1984. The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populations. Oecologia 61:334336.
WEST, G. B., ENQUIST, B. & BROWN, J. H. 2009. A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:70407045.
WESTOBY, M., FALSTER, D. S., MOLES, A. T., VESK, P. A. & WRIGHT, I. A. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:125159.
WICHMANN, L. 2001. Annual variations in competition symmetry in even-aged Sitka spruce. Annals of Botany 88:145151.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed