Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:07:08.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of avian and mammal seed dispersal networks to human-induced forest edges in a sub-humid tropical forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2022

Patrícia P. Chaves*
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes and Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016Lisboa, Portugal
Sérgio Timóteo
Affiliation:
Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456Coimbra, Portugal
Sara Gomes
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes and Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016Lisboa, Portugal
Ana Rainho
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes and Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author for correspondence: Patrícia P. Chaves, Email: fc50252@alunos.fc.ul.pt

Abstract

Species-rich ecosystems as tropical forests are extremely vulnerable to anthropogenic destruction. Most tropical plant species rely on animals to disperse their seeds. However, patterns of mutualistic interactions have rarely been explored, and seed dispersal networks are still poorly studied in Africa. Here, we examine how forest edges’ (FE) seed dispersal networks differ from the mature forest (MF) at a West African sub-humid tropical forest within the National Park of Cantanhez (Guinea-Bissau). Additionally, we explore species’ roles within the network. MF had higher fruit availability, more frugivore visitors, and plant–frugivore interactions. Network structure was quite similar between habitats, showing signs of redundancy, and some robustness to species’ extinction. FE was more nested, modular, and specialized, whereas MF had higher connectance, interaction evenness, and robustness to extinction. Most species were generalists, but large-bodied frugivores prevailed at MF. FE showed a higher vulnerability, mostly to the loss of trees. Trees are key, keeping the structure of both networks. Large-bodied frugivores and fruiting-tree species that work as network connectors should thus be the focus of active conservation management in these forests. Only viable populations of these species will ensure a good performance of the seed dispersal network, promoting the natural regeneration of the ecosystem.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida-Neto, M and Ulrich, W (2011) A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices. Environmental Modelling and Software 26, 173178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagchi, R, Swamy, V, Latorre Farfan, J-P, Terborgh, J, Vela, CIA, Pitman, NCA and Sanchez, WG (2018) Defaunation increases the spatial clustering of lowland Western Amazonian tree communities. Journal of Ecology 106, 14701482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bascompte, J (2007) Networks in ecology. Basic and Applied Ecology 8, 485490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bascompte, J and Jordano, P (2007) Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38, 567593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bascompte, J, Jordano, P, Melian, CJ and Olesen, JM (2003) The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 93839387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bascompte, J, Jordano, P and Olesen, JM (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312, 431433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastazini, VAG, Debastiani, VJ, Azambuja, BO, Guimarães, PR and Pillar, VD (2019) Loss of generalist plant species and functional diversity decreases the robustness of a seed dispersal network. Environmental Conservation 46, 5258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, BM and Walker, SC (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaune, D, Fruth, B, Bollache, L, Hohmann, G and Bretagnolle, F (2013) Doom of the elephant-dependent trees in a Congo tropical forest. Forest Ecology and Management 295, 109117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, SJ (2016) Improved community detection in weighted bipartite networks. Royal Society Open Science 3, 140536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleher, B and Böhning-Gaese, K (2001) Consequences of frugivore diversity for seed dispersal, seedling establishment and the spatial pattern of seedlings and trees. Oecologia 129, 385394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blüthgen, N (2010) Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: a critique and an ecologist’s guide. Basic and Applied Ecology 11, 185195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blüthgen, N, Fründ, J, Vazquez, DP and Menzel, F (2008) What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? Ecology 89, 33873399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blüthgen, N, Menzel, F, Hovestadt, T, Fiala, B and Blüthgen, N (2007) Specialization, constraints, and conflicting interests in mutualistic networks. Current Biology 17, 341346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bongaarts, J (2019) IPBES, 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Population and Development Review 45, 680681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrow, N and Demey, R (2001) Birds of Western Africa. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Brown, S and Lugo, AE (1994) Rehabilitation of tropical lands: a key to sustaining development. Restoration Ecology 2, 97111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catarino, L, Martins, ES and Moreira, I (2001) Influence of environmental features in the phytogeographic framework of Guinea-Bissau. Systematics and Geography of Plants 71, 10791086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, A and Chiu, C-H (2016) Species Richness: Estimation and Comparison, in Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, ed. L. John Wiley & Sons, 1–26.Google Scholar
Chapman, CA (1995) Primate seed dispersal: coevolution and conservation implications. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 4, 7482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, M, Timóteo, S, Rodríguez-echeverría, S and Mazars-simon, A (2017) The refaunation and the reinstatement of the seed-dispersal function in Gorongosa National Park. Conservation Biology 31, 7685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, JM, da Silva, LP, Ramos, JA and Heleno, RH (2016) Sampling completeness in seed dispersal networks: when enough is enough. Basic and Applied Ecology 17, 155164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehling, DM, Töpfer, T, Schaefer, HM, Jordano, P, Böhning-gaese, K &Schleuning, M (2014) Functional relationships beyond species richness patterns : Trait matching in plant – bird mutualisms across scales, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirzo, R, Young, HS, Galetti, M, Ceballos, G, Isaac, NJB and Collen, B (2014) Defaunation in the anthropocene. Science 345, 401406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dormann, CF, Frund, J, Bluthgen, N and Gruber, B (2009) Indices, graphs and null models: Analyzing bipartite ecological networks. The Open Ecology Journal 2, 724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugger, PJ, Blendinger, PG, Böhning-Gaese, K, Chama, L, Correia, M, Dehling, DM, Emer, C, Farwig, , N, Fricke, EC, Galetti, M, García, D, Grass, I, Heleno, R, Jacomassa, FAF, Moraes, S, Moran, , C, Muñoz, MC, Neuschulz, EL, Nowak, L, Piratelli, A, Pizo, MA, Quitián, M, Rogers, HS, Ruggera, , RA, Saavedra, F, Sánchez, MS, Sánchez, R, Santillán, V, Schabo, DG, da Silva, FR, Timóteo, , S, Traveset, A, Vollstädt, MGR and Schleuning, M (2019) Seed-dispersal networks are more specialized in the Neotropics than in the Afrotropics, Global Ecology and Biogeography 28, 248261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emer, C, Galetti, M, Pizo, MA, Jordano, P and Verdú, M (2019) Defaunation precipitates the extinction of evolutionarily distinct interactions in the Anthropocene, Science Advances 5, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortuna, MA, Stouffer, DB, Olesen, JM, Jordano, P, Mouillot, D, Krasnov, BR, Poulin, R and Bascompte, , J (2010) Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? Journal of Animal Ecology 79, 811817.Google ScholarPubMed
García-Algarra, J, Pastor, JM, Iriondo, JM and Galeano, J (2017) Ranking of critical species to preserve the functionality of mutualistic networks using the k-core decomposition. PeerJ 5, 117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genrich, CM, Mello, MAR, Silveira, FAO, Bronstein, JL and Paglia, AP (2017) Duality of interaction outcomes in a plant-frugivore multilayer network. Oikos 126, 361368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R, Tan, S, Plotkin, J, Slik, F, Detto, M, Brenes, T, Itoh, A and Davies, S (2013) Consequences of defaunation for a tropical tree community. Ecology Letters 16, 687694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heleno, RH, Ross, G, Everard, A, Memmot, J and Ramos, JA (2010) The role of avian ‘seed predators’ as seed dispersers. Ibis 153, 199203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, HF (1993) Specialized and generalized dispersal systems: where does ‘the paradigm’stand?. Vegetatio 107, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, HF and Smallwood, J (1982) Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 201228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordano, P (2016) Sampling networks of ecological interactions. Functional Ecology 30, 18831893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser-Bunbury, CN and Blüthgen, N (2015) Integrating network ecology with applied conservation: a synthesis and guide to implementation. AoB Plants 7, plv076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplin, BA and Lambert, JE (2002) Effectiveness of seed dispersal by Cercopithecus monkeys: Implications for seed input into degraded areas. in Seed Disperal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, eds. Levey, D.J., Silva, W.R. & Galetti, M.. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, 351364.Google Scholar
Lambert, JE (1999) Seed handling in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and redtail monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius): implications for understanding hominoid and cercopithecine fruit-processing strategies and seed dispersal. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 109, 365386.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurance, WF, Camargo, JLC, Luizão, RCC, Laurance, SG, Pimm, SL, Bruna, EM, Stouffer, PC, Bruce Williamson, G, Benítez-Malvido, J, Vasconcelos, HL, Van Houtan, KS, Zartman, CE, Boyle, SA, Didham, RK, Andrade, A and Lovejoy, TE (2011) The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: a 32-year investigation. Biological Conservation 144, 5667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S, Edwards, D and Galbraith, D (2015) Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science (New York, N.Y.) 349, 827832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, M and Lieberman, D (1986) An experimental study of seed ingestion and germination in a plant-animal assemblage in Ghana. Journal of Tropical Ecology 2, 113126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenmayer, D and Fischer, J (2006) Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change: An Ecological and Conservation Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Mello, MAR, Marquitti, FMD, Guimarães, PR, Kalko, EKV, Jordano, P and de Aguiar, MAM (2011a) The modularity of seed dispersal: differences in structure and robustness between bat- and bird-fruit networks. Oecologia 167, 131140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mello, MAR, Marquitti, FMD, Guimarães, PR, Kalko, EKV, Jordano, P and de Aguiar, MAM (2011b) The missing part of seed dispersal networks: structure and robustness of bat-fruit interactions. PLoS ONE 6, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Memmott, J, Waser, NM and Price, MV (2004) Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271, 26052611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menke, S, Böhning-Gaese, K and Schleuning, M (2012) Plant-frugivore networks are less specialized and more robust at forest-farmland edges than in the interior of a tropical forest. Oikos 121, 15531566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesinos-Navarro, A, Hiraldo, F, Tella, J and Blanco, G (2017) Network structure embracing mutualism–antagonism continuums increases community robustness. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, 16611669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oksanen, J, Blanchet, FG, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, Minchin, P, O’Hara, RB, Simpson, G, Solymos, P, Stevens, , MHH and Wagner, H (2013) Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version. 2.0-10, CRAN.Google Scholar
Olesen, JM, Bascompte, J, Dupont, YL and Jordano, P (2007) The modularity of pollination networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 1989119896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, DM and Dinerstein, E (2002) The global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89, 199224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oom, D, Lourenço, P, Cabral, AIR, Vasconcelos, MJP, Catarino, L, Cassamá, V and Moreira, J (2009) Quantification of deforestation rates in Guinea-Bissau- a baseline for carbon trading under REDD, in 33rd International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment. Stresa, Italy.Google Scholar
Poisot, T (2016) betalink: Beta-diversity of species interactions. R package version 2.2.1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=betalink.Google Scholar
Poisot, T, Canard, E, Mouillot, D, Mouquet, N and Gravel, D (2012) The dissimilarity of species interaction networks. Ecology Letters 15, 13531361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulsen, JR, Clark, CJ, Connor, EF and Smith, TB (2002) Differential resource use by primates and hornbills: implications for seed dispersal. Ecology 83, 228240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, JR, Clark, CJ and Palmer, TM (2013) Ecological erosion of an Afrotropical forest and potential consequences for tree recruitment and forest biomass. Biological Conservation 163, 122130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proulx, SR, Promislow, DEL and Phillips, PC (2005) Network thinking in ecology and evolution., Trends in Ecology and Evolutiony & Evolution 20, 345353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team, (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Ribeiro da Silva, F, Montoya, D, Furtado, R, Memmott, J, Pizo, MA and Rodrigues, RR (2015) The restoration of tropical seed dispersal networks. Restoration Ecology 23, 852860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saavedra, F, Hensen, I, Beck, SG, Böhning-Gaese, K, Lippok, D, Töpfer, T and Schleuning, M (2014) Functional importance of avian seed dispersers changes in response to human-induced forest edges in tropical seed-dispersal networks. Oecologia 176, 837848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schleuning, M, Blüthgen, N, Flörchinger, M, Braun, J, Schaefer, MH and Böhning-gaese, K (2011) Specialization and interaction strength in a tropical plant — frugivore network differ among forest strata. Ecology 92, 2636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleuning, M, Fründ, J, Klein, AM, Abrahamczyk, S, Alarcón, R, Albrecht, M, Andersson, GKS, Bazarian, , S, Böhning-Gaese, K, Bommarco, R, Dalsgaard, B, Dehling, DM, Gotlieb, A, Hagen, M, Hickler, T, Holzschuh, A, Kaiser-Bunbury, CN, Kreft, H, Morris, RJ, Sandel, B, Sutherland, WJ, Svenning, , J-C, Tscharntke, T, Watts, S, Weiner, CN, Werner, M, Williams, NM, Winqvist, C, Dormann, , CF and Blüthgen, N (2012) Specialization of mutualistic interaction networks decreases toward tropical latitudes. Current Biology 22, 19251931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schleuning, M, Ingmann, L, Strauß, R, Fritz, SA, Dalsgaard, B, Matthias Dehling, D, Plein, M, Saavedra, F, Sandel, B, Svenning, JC, Böhning-Gaese, K and Dormann, CF (2014) Ecological, historical and evolutionary determinants of modularity in weighted seed-dispersal networks. Ecology Letters 17, 454463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanahan, M, So, S, Compton, SG and Corlett, R (2001) Fig-eating by vertebrate frugivores: a global review. Biological Reviews 76, 605611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timóteo, S, Correia, M, Rodríguez-Echeverría, S, Freitas, H and Heleno, R (2018) Multilayer networks reveal the spatial structure of seed-dispersal interactions across the Great Rift landscapes. Nature Communications 9, 111.Google ScholarPubMed
Timóteo, S, Ramos, JA, Vaughan, IP and Memmott, J (2016) High resilience of seed dispersal webs highlighted by the experimental removal of the dominant disperser. Current Biology 26, 910915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traveset, A, Heleno, R and Nogales, M (2014) The Ecology of Seed Dispersal, in Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, 3rd edition, ed. Gallagher, R.S.. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 6293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylianakis, JM, Laliberté, E, Nielsen, A and Bascompte, J (2010) Conservation of species interaction networks. Biological Conservation 143, 22702279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanthomme, H, Bellé, B and Forget, PM (2010) Bushmeat hunting alters recruitment of large-seeded plant species in Central Africa. Biotropica 42, 672679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, DP, Melián, CJ, Williams, NM, Blüthgen, N, Krasnov, BR and Poulin, R (2007) Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos 116, 11201127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, KD, Fogiel, MK, Lamperti, AM, Holbrook, KM, Stauffer, DJ, Hardesty, BD, Parker, VT and Smith, TB (1998) Seed dispersal by Ceratogymna hornbills in the Dja Reserve, Cameroon, Journal of Tropical Ecology 14, 351371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrangham, RW, Chapman, LJ and Chapman, CA (1994) Seed dispersal by forest chimpanzees in Uganda. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10, 355368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunderle, JM (1997) The role of animal seed dispersal in accelerating native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. Forest Ecology and Management 99, 223235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W (2012) Computational Ecology: Graphs, Networks and Agent-Based Modeling. Singapore: Scientific, World.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Chaves et al. supplementary material

Chaves et al. supplementary material

Download Chaves et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 202.8 KB