Skip to main content Accessibility help

Habitat and fig characteristics influence the bird assemblage and network properties of fig trees from Xishuangbanna, South-West China

  • Sawat Sanitjan (a1) (a2) and Jin Chen (a1)


To understand how fruit tree characteristics and microhabitats shape the assemblage of birds on fig trees and the pattern of fig–bird interactions, we observed and recorded, over 96 d and 816 h, the frugivorous birds visiting 32 individual trees belonging to 14 species of Ficus that were distributed across four different sites. A total of 30 bird species were recorded as eating figs, comprising 66.7% of the total number of frugivorous bird species recorded at the four sites. Small passerine birds such as bulbuls were the dominant frugivores for fig species. The number of bird species visiting different fig trees was significantly influenced by the crop size and canopy volume. Fruit colour and fruit size did not significantly influence the number of bird species, whereas habitats appeared to influence the composition of visiting birds. The fig–frugivorous bird interaction was asymmetrically structured, and the degree of nestedness appeared to be influenced by the forest type and degree of disturbance: the degree of nestedness in non-limestone forest tended to be higher than limestone forest; forest with less disturbance tend to be more nested compared with the open forest with high disturbance.


Corresponding author

1Corresponding author:


Hide All
BALASUBRAMANIAN, P. 1996. Interactions between fruit-eating birds and bird-dispersed plants in the tropical dry evergreen forest of Point Calimere, South India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 93:428441.
BASCOMPTE, J. & JORDANO, P. 2007. Plant–animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 38:567593.
BASCOMPTE, J., JORDANO, P., MELIÁN, C. J. & OLESEN, J. M. 2003. The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102:54435447.
BERG, C. C. 1989. Classification and distribution of Ficus. Experientia 45:605611.
BORGIA, G. & KEAGY, J. 2006. An inverse relationship between decoration and food colour presences in satin bowerbirds does not support the sensory drive hypothesis. Animal Behaviour 72:11251133.
BRAWN, J. D., ROBINSON, S. K. & THOMPSON, F. R. 2001. The role of disturbance in ecology and conservation of birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:251276.
CAO, M., ZHANG, J., FENG, Z., DENG, J. & DENG, X. 1996. Tree species composition of a seasonal rain forest in Xishuangbanna, southwest China. Tropical Ecology 37:183192.
CORLETT, R. T. 1996. Characteristics of vertebrate-dispersed fruits in Hong Kong. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12:819833.
CORLETT, R. T. 1998. Frugivory and seed dispersal by vertebrates in the Oriental (Indomalayan) region. Biological Reviews 73:413448.
CUTLER, A. H. 1994. Nested biotas and biological conservation: metrics, mechanisms, and meaning of nestedness. Landscape and Urban Planning 28:7382.
FLEMING, T. H. 1981. Fecundity, fruiting pattern, and seed dispersal in Piper amalago (Piperaceae), a bat-dispersed tropical shrub. Oecologia 51:4246.
GIL-TENA, A., SAURA, S. & BROTONS, L. 2007. Effects of forest composition and structure on bird species richness in a Mediterranean context: implications for forest ecosystem management. Forest Ecology and Management 242:470476.
GRYJ, E. O. & DOMINGUEZ, A. C. 1996. Fruit removal and postdispersal survivorship in the tropical dry forest shrub Erythroxylum havanense: ecological and evolutionary implications. Oecologia 108:368374.
GUIMARÃES, P. R., RICO-GRAY, V., FURTADO DOS REIS, S. & THOMPSON, J. N. 2006. Asymmetries in specialization in ant–plant mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society, series B 273:20412047.
HEINDL, M. & CURIO, E. 1999. Observations of frugivorous birds at fruit-bearing plants in the North Negros Forest Reserve, Philippines. Ecotropica 5:157181.
HOWE, H. F. & DESTEVEN, D. 1979. Fruit production, migrant bird visitation, and seed dispersal of Guarea glabra in Panama. Oecologia 39:185196.
HOWE, H. F. & VANDE KERCKHOVE, G. A. 1979. Fecundity and seed dispersal of a tropical tree. Ecology 60:180189.
JANZEN, D. H. 1979. How to be a fig. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10:1351.
JORDANO, P., BASCOMPTE, J. & OLESEN, J. M. 2003. Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant–animal interactions. Ecology Letters 6:6981.
KALKO, E. K., HERRE, E. A. & HANDLEY, C. O. 1996. Relation of fig fruit characteristics to fruit-eating bats in the New and Old World tropics. Journal of Biogeography 23:565576.
KANNAN, R. & JAMES, D. A. 1999. Fruiting phenology and the conservation of the Great Pied Hornbill (Buceros bicornis) in Western Ghats of Southern India. Biotropica 31:167177.
KINNAIRD, M. F. & O'BRIEN, T. G. 2005. Fast foods of the forest: the influence of figs on primates and hornbills across Wallace's line. Pp. 155184 in Dew, J. L. & Boubli, J. P. (eds). Tropical fruits and frugivores: the search for strong interactors. Springer Press, New York.
KINNAIRD, M. F., O'BRIEN, T. G. & SURYADI, S. 1996. Population fluctuation in Sulawesi Red-knobbed Hornbills: tracking figs in space and time. Auk 113:431440.
KISSLING, W. D., RAHBEK, C. & BÖHNING-GAESE, K. 2007. Food plant diversity as broad-scale determinant of avian frugivore richness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274:799808.
KORINE, C., KALKO, E. K. V. & HERRE, E. A. 2000. Fruit characteristics and factors affecting fruit removal in a Panamanian community of strangler figs. Oecologia 123:560568.
LAMBERT, F. & MARSHALL, A. G. 1991. Keystone characteristics of bird-dispersed Ficus in a Malaysian lowland rain forest. Journal of Ecology 79:793809.
LEIGHTON, M. & LEIGHTON, D. R. 1983. Vertebrate responses to fruiting seasonality within a Bornean rainforest. Pp. 181209 in Sutton, S. L., Whitmore, T. C. & Chadwick, A. C. (eds). Tropical rain forests: ecology and management. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
LEKAGUL, B. & ROUND, P. D. 1991. A guide to the birds of Thailand (3rd edition). Saha Karn Bhaet, Bangkok. 457 pp.
LOMOLINO, M. V. 1996. Investigating causality of nestedness of insular communities: selective immigrations or extinctions? Journal of Biogeography 23:699703.
MACKINNON, J. & PHILLIPPS, K. 2000. A field guide to the birds of China. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 571 pp.
MARTÍNEZ-MORALES, M. A. 2005. Nested species assemblages as a tool to detect sensitivity to forest fragmentation: the case of cloud forest birds. Oikos 108:634642.
MCKEY, D. 1975. The ecology of coevolved seed dispersal systems. Pp. 159191 in Gilbert, L. E. & Raven, P. H. (eds). Coevolution of animals and plants. University of Texas Press, Austin.
MEYER, C. F. J. & KALKO, E. K. V. 2008. Bat assemblages on neotropical land-bridge islands: nested subsets and null model analyses of species co-occurrence patterns. Diversity and Distributions 14:644654.
MITCHELL, R. J., HIERS, J. K., O'BRIEN, J. J., JACK, S. B. & ENGSTROM, R. T. 2006. Silviculture that sustains: the nexus between silviculture, frequent prescribed fire and conservation of biodiversity in longleaf pine forests of the southeastern United States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:27242736.
MURRAY, G. K. 1987. Selection for optimal fruit-crop size in bird dispersed plants. American Naturalist 129:1831.
NOMA, N. & YUMOTO, T. 1997. Fruiting phenology of animal-dispersed plants in response to winter migration of frugivores in a warm temperate forest on Yakushima Island, Japan. Ecological Research 12:119129.
POONSWAD, P., CHUAILUA, P., PLONGMAI, K. & NAKKUNTOD, S. 1998. Phenology of some Ficus species and utilization of Ficus sources in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Pp. 227244 in Poonswad, P. (ed.). The Asian hornbills: ecology and conservation, Thai studies in biodiversity No 2. BIOTEC, NSTDA, Bangkok.
SHANAHAN, M. & COMPTON, S. G. 2001. Vertical stratification of figs and fig-eaters in a Bornean lowland rain forest: how is canopy different? Plant Ecology 153:121132.
SHANAHAN, M., SO, S., COMPTON, S. & CORLETT, R. 2001. Fig-eating by vertebrate frugivore: a global review. Biological Reviews 76:529572.
SOUTHWOOD, T. R. E. 1978. Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. (Second edition). Chapman & Hall Press, London. 524 pp.
TERBORGH, J. 1986. Keystone plant resources in the tropical forest. Pp. 330334 in Soulé, M. E. (ed.). Conservation biology. Academic Press, New York.
VÁZQUEZ, D. P., MORRIS, W. F. & JORDANO, P. 2005. Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants. Ecology Letters 8:10881094.
VÁZQUEZ, D. P., MELIAN, C. J., WILLIAMS, N. M., BLUTHGEN, N., KRASNOV, B. R. & POULIN, R. 2007. Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos 116:11201127.
WILLSON, M. F. & WHELAN, C. J. 1989. Ultraviolet reflectance of fruits of vertebrate-dispersed plants. Oikos 55:341348.
WORTHEN, W. B. 1996. Community composition and nested-subset analyses: basic descriptors for community ecology. Oikos 76:417426.
ZHOU, Z. K. & GILBERT, M. G. 2003. Moraceae. Flora of China 5:2173.
ZHU, H. 2006. Forest vegetation of Xishuangbanna, south China. Forestry Studies in China 8:158.
ZHU, H., WANG, H., LI, B. & SIRIRUGSA, P. 2003. Biogeography and floristic affinities of the limestone flora in Southern Yunnan, China. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90:444465.


Habitat and fig characteristics influence the bird assemblage and network properties of fig trees from Xishuangbanna, South-West China

  • Sawat Sanitjan (a1) (a2) and Jin Chen (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed