Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-wgjn4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T03:42:18.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V. Reviews - The New Editions of the Rigveda-Saṁhitâ with Sâyaṇa'a Commentary. By M. Winternitz, Ph.D.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes of the Quarter
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1891

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 173 note 1 Rigveda-Samhitâ, The Sacred Hymns of the Brâhmans, together with the Commentary of Sâyanâkârya, Edited by Müller, F. Max. Second edition, vol. i. Mandala I.Google Scholar; vol. ii. Mandalas II. to VI. Published under the patronage of His Highness the Mâhârajah of Vijayanagara. London (Henry Frowde, Oxford University Press Warehouse, Amen Corner) 1890.

page 173 note 2 Ṛik-Saṁhitâ Sâyaṇâchârya-virachita-bhâshya-sahitâ, Padapâtha-yutâ cha. Iyaṁ cha Tattvavivechakagranthaprasâraka-samityâ preritaḥ, Tukârâmatâtyâbhikhyaḥ, Gaṇapatakṛishṇâjî-mudrâyantrâlayâdhipatiḥ, Âtmârâmakâhnobâbhikhyaḥ, ity ekâbhyâm Bodasopâhva-Mahâmahopâdhyâya Râjâ-Râma-S'âstri, Gore-ity upâbhidha-S'iva-Râma âstribhyâm s'odhayitvâ, Mumbayyâm Ganapatakrishnâjî-Mudrâyantrâlaye mudrayitvâ prakâs'itâ. Tasyâ ayaṁ prathamo Ashṭakaḥ. S'akâbdâḥ 1810.

page 174 note 1 See now vol. i. of the second edition, pp. xlii seqq.

page 174 note 2 Vedische Studien, i. 1889, pp. iv seqq.

page 175 note 1 Rigveda Sanhitâ, translated by Wilson, H. H., vol. i. p. xlixGoogle Scholar.

page 176 note 1 In spite of repeated inquiries Prof. Max Müller has not succeeded in getting any information about this work. There is a Purushêrthênus'êsana mentioned in Bühler's Report of a Tour in Search of Sanskrit MSS., Nro. 637. But Prof. Bhandarkar, on examining the MS. in question at Prof. M. Müller's request, found that it was an entirely different work.