Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:09:42.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The tenacity of Elminius modestus and Balanus perforatus cyprids to bacterial films grown under different shear regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. L. Neal  and
A. B. Yule
A. L. Neal
Affiliation:
Marine Science Laboratories, University of Wales, Askew Street, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL57 5EY
A. B. Yule
Affiliation:
Marine Science Laboratories, University of Wales, Askew Street, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL57 5EY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The tenacity of cypris larvae of the barnacles (Crustacea: Cirripedia) Balanus perforatus (Bruguiere) and Elminius modestus Darwin was measured on multispecies biofilms developed under contrasting shear regimes. For both species, relatively thin, dense biofilms associated with high shear (83 s-1) afforded increased tenacity over relatively thick, less dense films associated with low shear (15 s-1). Although both species showed reduced tenacity on low-shear films compared to high-shear films, E. modestus cyprids attached as strongly to low-shear films as they did to unfilmed surfaces. Balanus perforatus cyprids, however, attached less strongly to low-shear films than to unfilmed surfaces. The results show that B. perforatus and E. modestus may appreciate differences in bacterial communi-ties grown under different shear conditions and highlight the potential for biofilms as one of the many cues to barnacle settlement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 251 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertness, M.D., Gaines, S.D., Stephens, E.G. & Yund, P.O., 1992. Components of recruitment in populations of the acorn barnacle Semibalanus balanoides (Linnaeus). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 156, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourget, E., 1988. Barnacle larval settlement: the perception of cues at different spatial scales. In Behavioural adaptation to intertidal life (ed. G., Chelazzi and M., Vannini), pp. 153–172. London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Characklis, W.G., Zelver, N. & Turakhia, M., 1984. Microbial films and energy losses. In Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study (ed. J.D., Costlow and R.C., Tipper), pp. 75–81. London: E. & F.C. Spon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, B.E. & Characklis, W.G., 1990. Physical and chemical properties of biofilms. In Biofilms (ed. W.G., Characklis and K.C., Marshall), pp. 93–130. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Crisp, D.J., 1958. The spread of Elminius modestus Darwin in north-west Europe. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 483–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D.J., 1990. Gregariousness and systematic affinity in some North Carolinian barnacles. Bulletin of Marine Science, 47, 516–525.Google Scholar
Crisp, D.J. & Meadows, P.S., 1963. Adsorbed layers: the stimulus to settlement in barnacles. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 158, 364–387.Google Scholar
Dudderidge, J.E., Kent, C.A. & Laws, J.F., 1982. Effect of surface shear stress on the attachment of Pseudomonas fluorescens to stainless steel under defined flow conditions. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 24, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, B.A., 1987. Barnacle ecology and adaptation. In Barnacle biology (ed. A.J., Southward), pp. 113–133. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema. [Crustacean Issues 5.]Google Scholar
Holm, E.R., 1990. Effects of density-dependent mortality on the relationship between recruitment and larval settlement. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 60, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E.W., 1953. Laboratory experiments on gregarious settling in Balanus balanoides and other barnacles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 30, 584–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E.W. & Waugh, G.D., 1949. On the larval development of Elminius modestus Darwin. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 28, 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Y.L. & Liu, D., 1993. Effect of flow rate on biofilm accumulation in open channels. Water Research, 27, 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Tourneaux, F. & Bourget, E., 1988. The importance of physical and biological cues used at different spatial scales by the larvae of the barnacle Semibalanus balanoides. Marine Biology, 97, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maki, J.S., Rittschof, D., Costlow, J.D. & Mitchell, R., 1988. Inhibition of attachment of larval barnacles, Balanus amphitrite, by bacterial surface films. Marine Biology, 97, 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maki, J.S., Rittschof, D., Samuelsson, M.-O., Szewzyk, U., Yule, A.B., Kjelleberg, S., Costlow, J.D. & Mitchell, R., 1990. Effect of marine bacteria and their exopolymers on the attachment of barnacle cypris larvae. Bulletin of Marine Science, 46, 499–511.Google Scholar
Moyse, J., 1960. Mass rearing of barnacle cyprids in the laboratory. Nature, London, 185, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, A.L. & Yule, A.B., 1992. The link between cypris temporary adhesion and settlement of Balanus balanoides (L.). Biofouling, 6, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R.C., 1979. Biology of intertidal animals. Faversham: Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd.Google Scholar
Norris, E. & Crisp, D.J., 1953. The distribution and planktonic stages of the cirripede Balanus perforatus (Bruguiere). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 123, 393–409.Google Scholar
Rainbow, P.S., 1984. An introduction to the biology of British littoral barnacles. Field Studies, 6, 1–51.Google Scholar
Rittman, B.E., 1982. The effect of shear stress on biofilm loss rate. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 24, 501–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, R., Callow, M.E. & Bott, T.R., 1991. The structure of Pseudomonas flourescens biofilms in contact with flowing systems. Biofouling, 4, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trulear, M.G. & Characklis, W.G., 1982. Dynamics of biofilm processes. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 54, 1288–1301.Google Scholar
Walne, P.R., 1966. Experiments in large-scale culture of the larvae of Ostrea edulis L. Fishery Investigations, Series 2. MAFF. London, 25, 53.Google Scholar
Whillis, J.A., Yule, A.B. & Crisp, D.J., 1990. Settlement of Chthamalus montagui Southward cyprids on barnacle arthropodin. Biofouling, 2, 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C.M., 1966. The sea shore. London: W. Collins.Google Scholar
Yule, A.B., 1984. The effect of temperature on the swimming activity of barnacle nauplii. Marine Biology Letters, 5, 1–11.Google Scholar
Yule, A.B. & Crisp, D.J., 1983. Adhesion of cypris larvae of the barnacle, Balanus balanoides, to clean and arthropodin treated surfaces. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, A.B. & Walker, G., 1984. The temporary adhesion of barnacle cyprids: effects of some differing surface characteristics. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar