Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T11:20:50.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Revised Check-List of British Marine Diatoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

N. Ingram Hendey
N. Ingram Hendey
Affiliation:
Penwinnick Pare, St Agnes, Cornwall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The preliminary check-list of British marine diatoms first appeared in this Journal about 20 years ago (Hendey, 1954), and since that time many advances have been made in the study of these organisms. First, the known flora has been extended very considerably (Hendey, 1964, 1973) and much has been added to our knowledge of the structure of the valve by the use of the scanning electron microscope through the work of Hasle (1964, 1965a, b, 1972) and that of Ross & Sims (1970, 1971). This new information must inevitably lead to a reappraisal of views held on phylogeny within the group and consequently upon its systematic classification. While it would be premature at this stage to over-emphasize the importance of information gained in this way until a wider range of species has been examined, sufficient exists to support some minor changes and prepares the way for more radical changes that the new developments suggest. It should be pointed out, of course, that most of the ‘new information’ should more correctly be interpreted as confirmation of earlier views based solely on structure as seen in the light microscope of classical design and that some of the changes made in the classification as a result of these had been made many years previously, but the scanning electron microscope has enabled us to see more clearly the ultimate structure of the siliceous frustule of the diatom, thus permitting more positive decisions to be made regarding relationships and possible lines of descent.

At the First Symposium on Recent and Fossil Marine Diatoms held at Bremerhaven in 1970, Simonsen (1972) put forward some ideas for a more natural system of classification of the centric diatoms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , May 1974 , pp. 277 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, M., Downie, C., Ross, R. & Sarjeant, W. A. S., 1967. Thallaphyta-2. In The Fossil Record. A Symposium with documentation, pp. 181–209. Geological Society of London.Google Scholar
Boalch, G. T., 1973. The type material of the diatom genus Bacteriastrum Shadbolt. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia (in the Press).Google Scholar
Cleve, P. T., 1894–1895. Synopsis of the naviculoid diatoms. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, pt 1, 1894, 26, no. 2, 194; pt 2, 1895, 27, no. 3, 220.Google Scholar
Dawson, P. A., 1973. The morphology of the siliceous components of Didymosphenia geminata (Lyngb.) M. Schm. British Phycological Journal, 8, 65–78.Google Scholar
Drebes, G., 1966. On the life history of the marine plankton diatom Stephanopyxis palmeriana. Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 13, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenguelli, J., 1953. Diatomeas del Territorio Nacional de Misiones. Revista del Museo de la Plata, Seccion Botanica, 8, 63–86.Google Scholar
Fryxell, G. A. & Hasle, G. R., 1973. Thalassiosira eccentrica (Ehrenb.) Cleve, T. symmetrica sp. nov., and some related centric diatoms. Journal of Phy oology, 8, 297–317.Google Scholar
Gasse, F., 1970. Ultrastructure et organisation coloniale de la diatomée Fragilaria construens (Ehr.) Grun. révélée par le microscope électronique à balayage. Compte rendu hebdomaire des séances de l' Académie des Sciences, 271, 1975–1977.Google Scholar
Gleave, H. H., 1972. Hydrosera triquetra, a diatom new to European waters. Microscopy, 32, 208.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1964. Nitzschia and Fragilariopsis species studied in the light and electron microscopes. 1. Some marine species of the groups Nitzschiella and Lanceolatae. Skrifter utgitt av det Norske videnskaps-akademi i Oslo 1, Matemisk naturvidenskapelig Klasse, Ny Serie, 16, 48 pp.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1965 a. 2. The group Pseudonitzschia. Skrifter utgitt av det Norske videnskapsakademi i Oslo 1, Matemisk naturvidenskapelig Klasse, Ny Serie, 18, 45 pp.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1965 b. 3. The genus Fragilariopsis. Skrifter utgitt av det Norske videnskaps-akademi i Oslo 1, Matemisk naturvidenskapelig Klasse, Ny Serie, 21, 49 pp.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1972. Two types of valve processes in centric diatoms. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, 39, 55–78.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1973. Thalassiosiraceae, a new diatom family. Norwegian Journal of Botany, 20, 67–69.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R. & Heimdal, B. R., 1970. Some species of the centric diatom genus Thalassiosira studied in the light and electron microscopes. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, 31, 559–581.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. Ingram, 1937. The plankton diatoms of the Southern Seas. ‘Discovery’ Reports, 16, 151–364.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. Ingram, 1954. A preliminary check-list of British marine diatoms. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 33, 537–560.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. Ingram, 1964. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part 5, Bacillariophyceae (diatoms). Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Series 4, 317.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. Ingram, 1974. Some benthic diatoms from the coast of Cornwall in the neighbourhood of Porthleven. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia (in the Press).Google Scholar
Hustedt, F., 1937. Systematische und økologische Untersuchungen über die diatomeen-flora von Java, Bali und Sumatra. Tropische Binnengewässer VII. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 15 (supplement), 131–177.Google Scholar
Jousé, A.et al., 1949. Systematics on fossil and living diatoms, order Centrales and Mediales, Part 2. In Diatom Analysis (ed. Proshkina-Lavrenko, A. I.). Botanicheskii Institut Akademii Nauk S.S.S.R. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Karsten, G., 1928. Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). In Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien (eds A., Engler and K., Prantl), pp. 105–303. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Korner, H., 1970. Morphologie und taxonomie der Diatomeengattung Asterionella. Nova Hedwigia, 20, 557–724.Google Scholar
Mereschkowsky, C., 1903. Zur Morphologie der Diatomeen, 1–427 pp. Kasan.Google Scholar
Patrick, R. & Reimer, C. W., 1966. The diatoms of the United States. Monographs. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 13, 688.Google Scholar
Ross, R., 1972. The current state of diatom taxonomy at the species level with special reference to some species of Navicula Sect. Lyratae. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, 39, 1–36.Google Scholar
Ross, R. & Sims, P. A., 1970. Studies of Aulacodiscus with the scanning electron microscope. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, 31, 49–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, R. & Sims, P. A., 1971. Generic limits in the Biddulphiaceae as indicated by the scanning electron microscope. In Scanning Electron Microscopy. Systematic and Evolutionary Applications (ed. Heywood, V. H.), pp. 155–177. London, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ross, R. & Sims, P. A. 1972. The fine structure of the frustule in centric diatoms: a suggested terminology. British Phycological Journal, 7, 139–63.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A., 1874–1944. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde, plates 1–460. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schütt, F., 1896. Bacillariales. In Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien (eds A., Engler and K., Prantl), vol. 1, pp. 31–150. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm.Google Scholar
Simon, M.-F., 1954. Un exemple de l'importance systématique de l'appareil plastidial chez les diatomées. Compte rendu hebdomaire des séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 238, 1156–58.Google Scholar
Simonsen, R., 1972. Ideas for a more natural system of the centric diatoms. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, 39, 37–54.Google Scholar
Stosch, H. A. Von & Drebes, G., 1964. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche untersuchungen an zentrischen diatomeen. IV. Die planktondiatomee Stephanopyxis turris ihre Behandlung und Entwicklungsgeschichte. Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 11, 209–257.Google Scholar
Stosch, H. A. Von & Reimann, B. E. F., 1970. Subsilicea fragilarioides gen. et spec, nov., Eine Diatomee (Fragilariaceae) mit vorwiegend organischer Membran. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, 31, 1–36 pp.Google Scholar
West, G. S., 1904. A Treatise on the British Freshwater Algae, 372 pp. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar