Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-m6qld Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T04:43:59.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the brackish-water and marine species of Tubificidae [Annelida,Oligochaeta]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. O. Brinkhurst
R. O. Brinkhurst
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A re-investigation of fresh material makes it necessary to create the new genus Thalassodrilus for T. prostatus (Knollner). Careful adherence to generic and specific criteria as detailed leads to the recognition of nineteen brackish-water and marine Tubificidae, and some dubious entities are also listed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , November 1963 , pp. 709 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brinkhurst, R. O., 1962 a. A redescription of Peloscolex variegatus Leidy (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae), with a consideration of the diagnosis of the genus Peloscolex. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., Bd. 47, pp. 301–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19626. A redescription of Tubifex newaensis (Michaelsen), (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae), with a consideration of its taxonomic position within the genus. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., Bd. 47, pp. 307–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1963 a. Taxonomic studies on the Tubificidae. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 1963, Syst.Beihefte 2, 89 pp.Google Scholar
19636. A genus of brackish-water Oligochaeta new to Britain. Nature, Lond.Vol. 199, p. 1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkhurst, R. O.Isle of Man. Arch. Hydrobiol., Bd. 58, pp. 367–76.Google Scholar
Cekanovskaya, O. V., 1962. The aquatic Oligochaeta of the U.S.S.R. Diagnoses of the Fauna of the U.S.S.R., Vol. 78, 411 pp. Moscow: The Academy of Science of The U.S.S.R.Google Scholar
Hrabe, S., i960. Oligochaeta limicola from the collection of Dr S. Husmann. Publ. Fac. Sci. Univ. Brno, No. 415, pp. 245–77.Google Scholar
1963. Rhizodrilus montanus n.sp. from the glacier lake in the Perister mountainsin South Macedonia. Publ. Fac. Sci. Univ. Brno, No. 435, pp. 335–46.Google Scholar
Jaekel, S. G. A., 1963. Die Tierwelt der Schlei. Schr. naturw. Ver. Schl.-Holst. ,Bd. 33, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
Knoller, F. H., 1935. Okologische und systematische Untersuchungen iiber litorale und marine Oligochaten der Kieler Bucht. Zool. Jb. (Syst.), Bd. 66, pp. 425–512.Google Scholar
Leloup, E.Miller, O., 1940. La flore et la faune du bassin de chasse d'Ostende. Mem. Mus. Hist. nat. Belg., T. 94, pp. 3–123.Google Scholar
Michaelsen, W., 1927. Oligochaeta. Tierwelt N.-u. Ostsee, Teil 6, ci, pp. 1–44 (Lief. 9).Google Scholar
Moore, J. P., 1905. Some marine Oligochaeta of New England. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., Vol. 57, pp. 373–400.Google Scholar
Nomura, E., 1915. On the aquatic oligochaete Monopylephorus limosus (Hatai). J. Coll. Sci. Tokyo, Vol. 35, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Pierantoni,., 1902. Due nuovi generi di Oligocheti marini rinvenuti del Golfo di Napoli. Boll. Soc. Nat. Napoli, Vol. 16, pp. 113–15.Google Scholar
1903. Altri nuovi Oligocheti del Golfo di Napoli. Boll. Soc. Nat. Napoli Vol. 17, pp. 185-92.Google Scholar
1916. SvdVHeterodrilus arenicolus Pier, e su di una nuova specie del genere Clitellio. Boll. Soc. Nat. Napoli, Vol. 29, pp. 82–91.Google Scholar