Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T01:41:32.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mucus production and its role in the feeding behaviour of Diarthrodes nobilis (Copepoda: Harpacticoida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Geoffrey R. F. Hicks  and
John Grahame
Geoffrey R. F. Hicks
Affiliation:
Wellcome Marine Laboratory, University of Leeds, Robin Hood's Bay, N. Yorkshire
John Grahame
Affiliation:
Wellcome Marine Laboratory, University of Leeds, Robin Hood's Bay, N. Yorkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Using light microscope histology and scanning electron microscopy, the secretion, storage and discharge of copious quantities of mucus has been demonstrated in the algadwelling harpacticoid copepod Diarthrodes nobilis (Baird). The mucus is secreted by cells closely associated with large haemocoelomic reservoirs, located in the cephalothorax and urosome, which store the mucus prior to its discharge through large integumental vents (up to 38 μm in greatest dimension). A denned behavioural sequence is recognized whereby the animal utilizes discharged mucus to construct an enmeshing capsule. Late stage nauplii are also capable of capsule fabrication.

The mucus bag presumably, acts as a rich and rapidly degradable substrate to marine prokaryotes and is therefore rapidly colonized; suspended organic and inorganic materials are also trapped by the mucus. Observations on gut contents and browsing activity of capsule inhabitants indicate a direct trophic dependence of D. nobilis on the bacteria and organic agglutinations that adhere to the mucus. Utilization of such nutritive materials supports a ‘mucus-trap’ hypothesis recently proposed as a feeding strategy in meiobenthic nematodes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , May 1979 , pp. 321 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bocquet, C., 1953. Sur un Copépode Harpacticoide mineur, Diarthrodes feldmanni n.sp. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 78, 101–105.Google Scholar
Fahrenbach, W. H., 1962. The biology of a harpacticoid copepod. Cellule, 62, 303–376.Google Scholar
Fleminger, A., 1973. Pattern, number, variability, and taxonomic significance of integumental organs (sensilla and glandular pores) in the genus Eucalanus (Copepoda, Calanoida). Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration of the United States, 71, 965–1010.Google Scholar
Gerlach, S. A., 1978. Food-chain relationships in subtidal silty sand marine sediments and the role of meiofauna in stimulating bacterial productivity. Oecologia, 33, 55–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Gharagozlou-Van Ginneken, I. D., 1977. Contribution a létude infrastructurale des glandes labrales de quelques harpacticoides (Crustacés Copépodes). Archives de biologie, 88, 79–100.Google Scholar
Green, J., 1958. Dactylapusioides macrolabris (Claus) (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) and its frond mining nauplius. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 131, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, J. P., 1954. The copepod Thalestris rhodymeniae (Brady) and its nauplius, parasitic in the seaweed Rhodymenia palmata (L.) Grev. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 124, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, G. R. F., 1978. Pattern and strategy in the reproductive cycles of benthic harpacticoid copepods. In Proceedings of the 13th European Marine Biology Symposium, Douglas, Isle of Man, 1978 (ed. Naylor, E. and Hartnoll, R. G.). Oxford: Pergamon Press. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Jansson, B.-O., 1968. Quantitative and experimental studies of the interstitial fauna in four Swedish sandy beaches. Ophelia, 5, 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, K., 1948. Monographic der Harpacticiden. 1683 pp. Lund: Hakan Ohlsson.Google Scholar
Mauchline, J. & Ballantyne, A. R. S., 1975. The integumental organs of amphipods. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E., 1968. Histochemistry, vol. 1, 3rd edition, 759 pp. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Riemann, F. & Schrage, M., 1978. The mucus-trap hypothesis on feeding of aquatic nematodes and implications for biodegradation and sediment texture. Oecologia, 34, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieper, M., 1978. Bacteria as food for marine harpacticoid copepods. Marine Biology, 45, 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1911. An Account of the Crustacea of Norway. Copepoda, Harpacticoida, vol. 5. 449 pp. Bergen: Albert Cammermeyer's Forlag.Google Scholar
Steedman, H. F., 1950. Alcian Blue 8 GS: a new stain for mucin. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 91, 477–479.Google Scholar