Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:45:12.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Female rock shrimp prefer dominant males

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2003

Martin Thiel*
Affiliation:
Universidad Católica del Norte, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile
*
*Corresponding author, e-mail: thiel@ucn.cl

Abstract

Evidence of female preference for dominant males during mating is reported for the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus. Two sexually mature males of different ontogenetic stage were tethered at opposite sides of a large tank. Tethering restricted males from actively pursuing the receptive female but allowed females to choose between males. Surprisingly most (10 out of 11) females first approached the subordinate typus male, but after these initial contacts all females chose the dominant robustus male. Following antennal and corporal contacts of variable duration seven (out of 11) females initiated the mating process with the robustus male, while four females did not initiate mating during the 90 min observation period. The fact that all mating females selected the robustus shows strong female preferences for these males. It is suggested that female preference for large and dominant males is common among crustaceans with sexual size-dimorphism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Correa, C., Baeza, J.A., Dupre, E., Hinojosa, I.A. & Thiel, M., 2000. Mating behavior and fertilization success of three onto-genetic stages of male rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). Journal of Crustacean Biology, 20, 628–640.Google Scholar
Correa, C., Baeza, J.A., Hinojosa, I.A. & Thiel, M., 2003. Dominance hierarchy and mating tactics in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). Journal of Crustacean Biology, 23, 33–45.Google Scholar
Hinojosa, I. & Thiel, M., 2003. Somatic and gametic resources in male rock shrimp, Rhynchocinetes typus—effect of mating potential and ontogenetic male stage. Animal Behaviour, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jormalainen, V., Merilaita, S. & Ha«rdling, R., 2000. Dynamics of intersexual conflict over precopulatory mate guarding in two populations of the isopod Idotea baltica. Animal Behaviour, 60, 85–93.Google Scholar
Paul, A.J. & Paul, J.M., 1996. Observations on mating of multi-parous Chionoecetes bairdi Rathbun (Decapoda: Majidae) held with different sizes of males and one-clawed males. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 16, 295–299.Google Scholar
Ra'anan, Z. & Sagi, A., 1985. Alternative mating strategies in male morphotypes of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 169, 592–601.Google Scholar
Snedden, W.A., 1990. Determinants of male mating success in the temperate crayfish Orconectes rusticus: chela size and sperm competition. Behaviour, 115, 100–113.Google Scholar