Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T03:50:45.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The feeding preferences of Aeolidia papillosa (L.) (Mollusca, Nudibranchia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. Edmunds ,
G. W. Potts ,
R. C. Swinfen  and
V. L. Waters
M. Edmunds
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Exeter University
G. W. Potts
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth
R. C. Swinfen
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth
V. L. Waters
Affiliation:
P.O. Box 103, Arcata, California 95521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A clear preference for the actinian anemones Actinia equina, Anemonia sulcata and Anthopleura elegantissima was demonstrated, while the acontian anemones and Corynactis viridis ranked low in the order of preference. The significance of acontia as defensive structures in anemones is discussed briefly. No differences in food preference were found between eolids collected from Plymouth and Millport; and British Aeolidia behaved in the same way towards Californian anemones as did Californian Aeolidia.

The eolids varied in their tendency to bite different species of anemone, but the performance of each individual eolid was similar in different experiments. It is possible that the individual variations may account for conflicting reports in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , November 1974 , pp. 939 - 947
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, N. T. J., 1959. Statistical Methods in Biology, 200 pp. London: The English Universities Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Boutan, L., 1898. Moeurs de l'Eolis papillosa Linné. Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale. Series 3, 6, 28.Google Scholar
Braams, W. G. & Geelen, H. F. M., 1953. The preference of some nudibranchs for certain coelenterates. Archives néerlandaises de zoologie, 10(3), 241–64.Google Scholar
Edmunds, M., 1966. Protective mechanisms in the Eolidacea (Mollusca Nudibranchia). Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology), 46 (308), 27–71.Google Scholar
Eliot, C. N. E., 1910. The British Nudibranchiate Mollusca, 8 (Supplement), 198 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Graham, A., 1938. The structure and function of the alimentary canal of eolid molluscs, with a discussion on their nematocysts. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 59(2), 267–307.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. H., 1940. The Invertebrates: Protozoa through Ctenophora, 726 pp. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miller, M. C., 1961. Distribution and food of the nudibranchiate mollusca of the South of the Isle of Man. Journal of Animal Ecology, 30, 95–116.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 1957. Plymouth Marine Fauna 3rd ed., 457 pp.Google Scholar
Robson, E., 1961. The swimming response and its pacemaker system in the anemone Stomphia coccinea. Journal of Experimental Biology, 38, 685–94.Google Scholar
Russell, H. D., 1942. Observations on the feeding of Aeolidia papillosa L., with notes on the hatching of the veligers of Cuthona amoena, A.H. Nautilus, 55(3), 80–2.Google Scholar
Siegel, S., 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, xviii, 312 pp. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Stehouwer, H., 1952. The preference of the slug Aeolidia papillosa (L.) for the sea anemone, Metridium senile (L.). Archives néerlandaises de zoologie, 10(2), 161–70.Google Scholar
Stephenson, T. A., 1935. The British Sea Anemones, 1, 148 and 2, 426. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Swennen, C., 1961. Data on distribution, reproduction and ecology of the nudibranchiate Molluscs occurring in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 1 (1–2), 191–240.Google Scholar
Tardy, J., 1969. Etude systematique et biologique sur trois espéces d'Aeolidielles des cotes européenes (Gasteropodes, Nudibranches). Bulletin de l'Institut Océanographique, 68 (1389), 1–40.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1964. Grazing and the life cycles of British Nudibranchs. British Ecological Society Symposium No. 4. Grazing in terrestrial and marine environments, ed. Crisp, D. J., 275–97. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Waters, V. L., 1973. Food-preference of the nudibranch Aeolidia papillosa, and the effect of the defences of the prey on predation. Veliger, 15(3), 174–92.Google Scholar
Weill, R., 1934. Contribution a l'Etude des Cnidaires et de leurs Nématocystes. II. Valeur Taxonomique du Cnidome. Travaux de la Station zoologique de Wimereux, 349–701.Google Scholar
Wolter, H., 1967. Beiträge zur Biologie, Histologie und Sinnesphysiologie (inbesondere der Chemorezeption) einiger Nudibranchier (Mollusca, Opisthobranchia) der Nordsee. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 60(4), 275–337.Google Scholar