Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:17:53.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental Factors Controlling the Epipsammic Flora on Beach and Sublittoral Sands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. H. Steele
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen
A. L. S. Munro
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen
G. S. Glese
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Biology, University of Puerto Rico

Extract

The degree of exposure of a beach to wave action largely determines particle size, sorting and beach gradient (King, 1959) and these, in turn, have a dominant effect on the animal communities within the sand (Swedmark, 1964; Mclntyre, 1969). It is likely, however, that the main turnover of energy, as indicated by the rapid removal of oxygen (Brafield, 1964; Hamilton & Greenfield, 1967), is due to bacteria and algae. On sheltered muddy beaches, motile diatoms can be of considerable importance (Aleem, 1950; Perkins, 1960) but for a relatively exposed beach at Firemore, Loch Ewe, on the west coast of Scotland, Fig. 1, there was negligible unattached plant material, living or dead, and the primary production by the diatoms attached to the sand grains was low (Steele & Baird, 1968). Further, these diatoms did not show evidence of heterotrophy (Munro & Brock, 1968; Mclntyre, Munro & Steele, 1970) yet, at low water mark on this beach, the populations of attached diatoms are relatively uniform to a depth of 20–30 cm in the sand and show no sign of pigment degradation or decreased photosynthetic ability. These conditions at low water mark differ from those at a water depth of 5–10 m where chlorophyll concentration in the upper 5 cm of the sand is higher but where pigment degradation and blackening of the sand, indicating reducing conditions, are usually found below 10 cm depth of sand.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aleem, A. A., 1950. The diatom community inhabiting the mud flats at Whitstable. New Phytol., Vol. 49, pp. 174–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brafield, A. E., 1964. The oxygen content of interstitial water in sandy shores. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 33, pp. 97116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, R. D. & Greenfield, L. J., 1967. Manometric assay of the metabolic activity of marine sediments micro-biota. Z. allg. Mikrobiol., Bd. 7, pp. 1927.Google Scholar
King, C. A. M., 1951. Depth of disturbance of sand on sea beaches by waves. J. sedim. Petrol., Vol. 21, pp. 131–40.Google Scholar
King, C. A. M., 1959. Beaches and Coasts, 403 pp. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Mcintyre, A. D., 1969. Ecology of marine meiobenthos. Biol. Rev., Vol. 44, pp. 245–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcintyre, A. D. & Eleftheriou, A., 1968. The bottom fauna of a flatfish nursery ground. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 113–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcintyre, A. D., Munro, A. L. S. & Steele, J. H., 1970. Energy Flow In A Sand Ecosystem. In Marine Food Chains, pp. 1931. Ed. Steele, J. H.. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Munro, A. L. S. & Brock, T. D., 1968. Distinction between bacterial and algal utilisation of soluble substances in the sea. J. gen. Microbiol., Vol. 51, pp. 3542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, E. J., 1960. The diurnal rhythm of the littoral diatoms of the River Eden Estuary, Fife. J. Ecol., Vol. 48, pp. 725–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, R. O. & Kajiura, K., 1957. On the damping of gravity waves over a permeable sea bed. Trans. Am. geophys. Un., Vol. 38, pp. 662–6.Google Scholar
Russell, R. C. H., 1960. Use of fluorescent tracers for the measurement of littoral drift. Proc. Conf. cst. Engng, No. 7, pp. 418–44.Google Scholar
Steele, J. H. & Baird, I. E., 1968. Production ecology of a sandy beach. Limnol. Oceanogr., Vol. 13, pp. 1425.Google Scholar
Swedmark, B., 1964. The interstitial fauna of marine sand. Biol. Rev., Vol. 39, pp. 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar