Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:30:16.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The comparative morphology of hepatic photophores in decapod Crustacea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Peter J. Herring
Peter J. Herring
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Wormley, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The hepatic photophores of species of Sergestes (organs of Pesta) contain fluorescent paracrystalline platelets which are the sources of the luminescence. The cells containing these crystals are contiguous with cells filled with lipid droplets which act as a diffuse reflector. The optical properties of the organ as a whole derive from the different arrangement of the various regions in the mosaic of individual tubules. The hepatic photophores of Parapandalus, Thalassocaris and Chlorotocoides have a similar anatomical position but differ considerably in structure. They do not contain paracrystalline material and they have a diffuse reflector, probably not composed of lipid, which is separated from the tubules that make up the photocytes. The organs in Thalassocaris and Chlorotocoides are very similar in structure. Luminescence in the photophores of all four genera is probably intracellular.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , August 1981 , pp. 723 - 737
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burkenroad, M. D., 1937. The Templeton Crocker Expedition. 12. Sergestidae (Crustacea Decapoda) from the Lower Californian region, with descriptions of two new species and some remarks on the organs of Pesta in Sergestes. Zoologica, New York, 22, 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennell, R., 1940. On the structure of the photophores of some decapod Crustacea. 'Discovery' Reports, 20, 307–382.Google Scholar
Dennell, R., 1955. Observations on the luminescence of bathypelagic Crustacea Decapoda of the Bermuda area. Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology), 42, 393–406.Google Scholar
Foxton, P., 1972. Further evidence of the taxonomic importance of the organs of Pesta in the genus Sergestes (Natantia, Penaeidea). Crustaceana, 22, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, T. & Inoue, S., 1975. Bioluminescent compounds from the squids Watasenia scintillcms and the shrimp Sergestes lucens. Abstracts, International Symposium on Marine Natural Products, University of Aberdeen, September 1975.Google Scholar
Herring, P. J., 1976. Bioluminescence in decapod Crustacea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 1029–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, P. J. (ed.), 1978. Bioluminescence in Action. 570 pp. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Herring, P. J. & Barnes, A. T., 1976. Light stimulated bioluminescence of Thalassocaris crinita Dana (Decapoda, Caridea). Crustaceana, 31, 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, S., 1925. Notes on Crustacea Decapoda in the Indian Museum. XVII. On various Caridea. Record of the Indian Museum, 27, 249–343.Google Scholar
Menon, P. G. & Williamson, D. I., 1971. Decapod Crustacea from the International Indian Ocean Expedition. The species of Thalassocaris (Caridea) and their larvae. Journal of Zoology, 165, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J. A. C, Arnott, H. J. & Best, A. C. G., 1973. Tapeta lucida in bony fishes (Actinopterygii): a survey. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 51, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, J. A., Latz, M. I. & Case, J. F., 1979. Cryptic bioluminescence in a midwater shrimp. Science, New York, 203, 1109–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar