Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:48:35.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The biology of Atrispinum labracis n. comb. (Monogenea) on the gills of the bass, Dicentrarchus labrax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2009

Judith Winch
Judith Winch
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Comparative Physiology, University of Birmingham, P.O. Box 363, Birmingham, B15 2TT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Atrispinum labracis (Van Beneden & Hesse) n.comb. syn. Microcotyle labracis Van Beneden & Hesse, 1863, parasitizes the bass Dicentrarchus labrax but almost only in the open sea; the very low prevalence of parasites on juvenile estuarine hosts was not due to intolerance of lower salinities in this habitat. The intensity of infection on open-sea bass was rarely more than 2 per fish but the strict localization of the habitat to the outer hemibranch of the ventral end of the first gill arch is thought to enhance the mating opportunities. The parasite attaches itself asymmetrically to the gill by a permanent morphological inclination of the body with respect to the haptor which is itself symmetrically aligned on a single primary lamella.

Substantial differences between the copulatory apparatus of A. labracis and that of Microcotyle donavini Van Beneden & Hesse, 1863, the type of Microcotyle, have made necessary the transfer of the parasite from Dicentrarchus labrax to Atrispinum Maillard & Noisy, 1979 and a consequent amendment to the diagnosis of the subfamily Atriasterinae Maillard & Noisy, 1979.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , November 1983 , pp. 915 - 927
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, M., 1981. The change with host age of the composition of the ancyrocephaline (monogenean) populations of parasites on thick-lipped grey mullets at Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 833–842.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. Van & Hesse, C. E., 1863. Recherches sur les bdelloides ou Hirudinées et les trernatodes marins. Mémoires de l'Académie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique, 34, 1–142.Google Scholar
Bychowsky, B. E., 1957. Monogenetic Trematodes, Their Systematics and Phytogeny. Moscow–Leningrad. [English translation: W. J., Hargis (1961), 627 pp. Washington: Graphic Arts Press.]Google Scholar
Euzet, L. & Maillard, C., 1973. Sur deux Microcotylidae (Monogenea) parasites branchiaux de Téléostéens du genre Diplodus (Sparidae). Bulletin du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, no. 137 (Zoologie 101), 793–805.Google Scholar
Euzet, L. & Marc, A., 1963. Microcotyle donavini Van Beneden et Hesse, 1863, espèce type du genre Microcotyle Van Beneden et Hesse, 1863. Annales de parasitologie humaine et comparée, 38, 875–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ktari, M. H. 1969. Recherches sur l'anatomie et la biologie de Microcotyle salpae Parona et Perugia, 1890 parasite de Box salpa L. (Téléostéen). Annales de parasitologie humaine et comparée, 44 (4), 425–440.Google Scholar
Ktari, M. H. 1971. Recherches sur la Reproduction et le Développement de Quelques Monogènes (Polyopisthocotylea), Parasites de Poissons Marins. Thesis, Académie de Montpellier, Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc.Google Scholar
Lebedev, B. I. & Parukhin, A. M., 1969. Monogenea of some fish from Wallfish Bay (Southwestern Africa). Gidrobiologicheskiˇ zhurnal, 5 (6), 70–81.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. 1956. The host-specificity, micro-ecology, adhesive attitudes, and comparative morphology of some trematode gill parasites. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 35, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J., 1957. Host specificity in monogenetic trematodes. In Proceedings of the First Symposium on Host Specificity among Parasites of Vertebrates, pp. 191–212. Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J., 1964. The effects of the host and its habits on the morphology and life-cycle of a monogenean parasite. In Parasitic Worms and Aquatic Conditions, pp. 147–152. Prague: Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J., Macdonald, S. & Green, J., 1980. Host-specificity and speciation in diclidophoran (monogenean) gill parasites of trisopteran (gadoid) fishes at Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. & Owen, I. L., 1960. The attachment of the monogenean Discocotyle sagittata Leuckart to the gills of Salmo trutta (L.). Parasitology, 50, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maillard, C. & Noisy, D., 1979. Atrispinum acarne n.g. n.sp. (Monogenea, Microcotylidae) parasite de Pagellus acarne (Teleostei) du Golfe du Lion. Vie et milieu, 28/29 (4), 579–588.Google Scholar
Ogawa, K. & Egusa, S., 1980. Two species of microcotylid monogeneans collected from Black Sea bream Acanthopagrus schlegeli (Bleeker) (Teleostei, Sparidae). Japanese Journal ofParasitology, 29 (6), 455–462.Google Scholar
Oliver, G., 1977. Biologie et écologie de Microcotyle labracis Van Beneden et Hesse, 1863 (Monogenea, Polyopisthocotylea) chez Dicentrarchus labrax (Linné, 1758) et Dicentrarchus punctatus (Bloch, 1792) (Pisces, Serranidae) des côtes de France. In Excerta Parasitologica en Memoria del Doctor Edwardo Caballero y Caballero, no. 4, pp. 91–98. Mexico: Universidad Autonoma de Mexico.Google Scholar
Oliver, G., 1981. Etude de Microcotyle labracis Van Beneden & Hesse, 1863 (Monogenea, Polyopisthocotylea, Microcotylidae) au microscope électronique à balayage. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 65, 235–240.Google Scholar
Owen, I. L., 1963. The attachment of the monogenean Diplozoon paradoxum to the gills of Rutilus rutilus (L.). I. Microhabitat and adhesive attitude. Parasitology, 53, 455–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parona, C. & Perugia, A., 1890. Contribuzione per una monografia de genere Microcotyle. Annali del Museo civico di storia naturale Giacomo Doria, 10, 173–220.Google Scholar
Remley, L. W., 1942. Morphology and life history studies of Microcotyle spinicirrus, a monogenetic trematode parasitic on the gills of Aplodinotus grunniens. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, 61, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., 1977. A non-competitive mechanism responsible for restricting niches. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 199, 144–172.Google Scholar
Sproston, N. G., 1946. A synopsis of monogenetic trematodes. Transactions of the Zoological Society, 25, 185–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, C., 1877. Sur les organes reproducteurs de quelques trématodes marines ectoparasites. Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale, 6, 371–373.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1963. Systema Heminthum. Volume IV. Monogenea and Aspidocotylea. 699 pp. Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar