Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:05:29.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aspects of the biology of Laminarja hyperborea IV. Growth of early sporophytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Joanna M. Kain
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Station, Port Erin, Isle of Man
Mrs N. S. Jones
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Station, Port Erin, Isle of Man

Extract

Sporophytes of Laminaria hyperborea have been grown under various conditions in the laboratory up to the stage of 1000 cells. Some larger plants have been observed after exposure in the sea. Growth was not increased by artificial aeration of the normally stagnant cultures, nor by introducing a dark period each day. The cell number per sporophyte was found to increase exponentially with time. In from 10- to 1000-celled plants the logarithm of the cell number was proportional to the logarithm of the plant length; the relationship corresponded to two-dimensional growth in the presence of increase in cell length. In this size range, when the plants were mainly monostromatic, the growth rate in the laboratory was 0.5 cell divisions/day and 22% increase in length/day. The growth rate of larger sporophytes, partly polystromatic, in the sea, was 10% increase in length/day. A sporophyte would take at least 54 days from the release of the parent zoospores to reach a length of 1 cm. The minimum continuous irradiance necessary for growth was 2 μg.cal/cm2sec (20 lux) at 10° C and 4–5μg.cal/cm2sec (40–50 lux) at 17° C. The saturating continuous irradiance was at about 100 μg.cal/cm2sec (1000 lux) at 10° C and about 150 μg.cal/cm2sec (1500 lux) at 17° C. Up to 360 μg.cal/cm2sec (3600 lux) from fluorescent lamps was not inhibitory. Growth at 15–20° C was approximately the same as at io° C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burrows, E. M., 1961. Experimental ecology with particular reference to the ecology of Laminaria saccharina (L.) Lamour. Recent Advances in Botany, pp. 187–9. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fallis, A. L., 1916. Growth in some Laminariaceae. Publ. Puget Sd mar. (biol.) Sta., Vol. 1, pp. 137–55.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Y., 1962. An ecological study of Laminaria angustata Kjellman on the coast of Hidaka Prov., Hokkaido. Bull. Hokkaido reg. Fish. Res. Lab., Vol. 24, pp. 116–38.Google Scholar
Kain, J. M., 1962. Aspects of the biology of Laminaria hyperborea. I. Vertical distribution. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, J. M., 1963. Aspects of the biology of Laminaria hyperborea. II. Age, weight and length. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, J. M., 1964. Aspects of the biology of Laminaria hyperborea. III. Survival and growth of gametophytes. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanda, T., 1938. On the gametophytes of some Japanese species of Laminariales. III. Set. Rep. Inst. algol. Res. Fac. Sd. Hokkaido imp. Univ., Vol. 2, pp. 155–93.Google Scholar
Myers, M., 1925. Contributions towards a knowledge of the life-histories of the Melanophyceae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot., Vol. 13, pp. 109–18.Google Scholar
Myers, M., 1928. The life-history of the brown alga Egreria menziesii. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot., Vol. 14, pp. 225–47.Google Scholar
Parke, M. W., 1948. Studies on British Laminariaceae. I. Growth in Laminaria saccharina (L.) Lamour. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 27, pp. 651709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvageau, C., 1918. Recherches sur les laminaires des côtes de France. Mém. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 56, pp. 1233.Google Scholar
Schreiber, E., 1930. Untersuchungen über Parthenogenesis, Geschlechtsbestimmung und Bastiardierungsvermögen bei Laminarien. Planta, Bd. 12, pp. 331–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segi, T. & Kida, W., 1958. Studies on the development of Undaria undarioides (Yendo) Okamura. II. On the development of the sporophytes and influence of light on it. Rep. Fac. Fish., Pref. Univ. Mie, Vol. 3, pp. 236–46.Google Scholar
Sundene, O., 1962. The implications of transplant and culture experiments on the growth and distribution of Alaria esculenta. Nytt Mag. Bot., Bd. 9, pp. 155–74.Google Scholar
Sundene, O., 1964. The ecology of Laminaria digitata in Norway in view of transplant experiments. Nytt Mag. Bot., Bd. 11, pp. 83107.Google Scholar
Withrow, R. B. & Withrow, A. P., 1956. Generation, control and measurement of visible and near-visible radiant energy. Radiation Biology. Vol. 3. Visible and Near-Visible Light, ed. A., Hollaender, Ch. 3.Google Scholar