Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:08:13.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RICHARD CAULDWELL, A syllabus for listening: Decoding. Birmingham: Speech in Action, 2018. Pp. xiii + 240. ISBN 978-0-9543447-7-1

Review products

RICHARD CAULDWELL, A syllabus for listening: Decoding. Birmingham: Speech in Action, 2018. Pp. xiii + 240. ISBN 978-0-9543447-7-1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2020

Mari Sakai*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. ms2335@georgetown.edu

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
© International Phonetic Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baralt, Melissa, Gilabert, Roger & Robinson, Peter (eds.). 2014. Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bradlow, Ann R., Torretta, Gina M. & Pisoni, David B.. 1996. Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication 20(3–4), 255272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breen, Michael P. 2001. Syllabus design. In Carter, Ronald & Nunan, David (eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages, 151159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael J.. 2006. Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide to spoken and written grammar and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erlam, Rosemary. 2008. What do you researchers know about language teaching? Bridging the gap between SLA research and language pedagogy. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 2(3), 253267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, John. 2004. An insight into listeners’ problems: Too much bottom–up or too much top–down? System 32(3), 363377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ali S. 2000. Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language Culture and Curriculum 13(2), 137153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishida, Mako & Arai, Takayuki. 2016. Missing phonemes are perceptually restored but differently by native and non-native listeners. SpringerPlus 5(1), 713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, Matthew K., Baud, Maxime O., Sjerps, Matthew J. & Chang, Edward F.. 2016. Perceptual restoration of masked speech in human cortex. Nature Communications 7, 13619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendelsohn, David. 2001. Listening comprehension: We’ve come a long way, but… Contact 27(2), 3340.Google Scholar
Nassaji, Hossein. 2012. The relationship between SLA research and language pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research 16(3), 337365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Peter. 2009. Syllabus design. In Michael, H. Long & Catherine, J. Doughty (eds.), The handbook of language teaching, 294310. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauroza, Steve & Allison, Desmond. 1990. Speech rates in British English. Applied Linguistics 11(1), 90105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, Amy B. M. & Fullilove, John. 1998. Bottom–up or top–down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistics 19(4), 432451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, Larry. 2004. Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, Larry & Goh, Christine C. M.. 2012. Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, Bill & Williams, Jessica. 2015. Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Lisa. 2013. The sounds of language: An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar