Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T02:14:09.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discrimination of English and Thai words ending with voiceless stops by native Thai listeners differing in English experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2008

Kimiko Tsukada
Affiliation:
Department of International Studies, Macquarie University, AustraliaKimiko.Tsukada@humn.mq.edu.au
Rungpat Roengpitya
Affiliation:
College of Religious Studies, Mahidol University, Thailandrungpat@gmail.com

Abstract

This study examines the discrimination of words ending with voiceless stops /p t k/ in first language (L1) and second language (L2) by three groups of native Thai participants. These participants differed in their countries of residence and experience with L2 English in the formal education system. The first group (T1) was a group of 18 Thai listeners who were living in Australia. The second and third groups consisted of 12 university students (T2) and 12 high-school students (T3) living in Thailand. Eighteen Australian English (AusE) listeners were included as controls. English and Thai words minimally contrasting in the final stop (e.g. ‘cap’ vs. ‘cat’) were presented to the listeners to investigate whether L2 phonetic learning occurs even for the contrasts that are expected to be discriminated with high accuracy from the onset of L2 learning and if so, how it is influenced by L2 experience. All three Thai groups showed reasonably accurate discrimination for both English and Thai words, but only T1 showed discrimination accuracy comparable to AusE in English. Further, only T3 was clearly more accurate in discriminating unreleased Thai than English stop contrasts, most of which were accompanied with release bursts. These two findings are taken to be evidence for phonetic learning of specific aspects of L2 contrasts rather than positive L1 transfer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Arthur S. 1972. Word-final stops in Thai. In Jimmy G. Harris & Richard B. Noss (eds.), Tai phonetics and phonology, 1–7. Central Institute of English Language, Office of State Universities, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. 2001. The stability of distinctive vowel length in Thai. InTingsabadh, M. R. Kalaya & Abramson, Arthur S. (eds.), Essays in Tai linguistics, 1326. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. & Ren, Nianqi. 1990. Distinctive vowel length: Duration vs. spectrum in Thai. Journal of Phonetics 18 (2), 7992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. & Kalaya Tingsabadh, M. R.. 1999. Thai final stops: Cross-language perception. Phonetica 56 (3/4), 111122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoyama, Katsura,Flege, James E., Guion, Susan G., Akahane-Yamada, Reiko & Yamada, Tsuneo. 2004. Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics 32 (2), 233250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bent, Tessa & Bradlow, Ann R.. 2003. The interlanguage intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114 (3), 16001610.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech. InStrange, Winifred (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 171204. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. & Strange, Winifred. 1992. Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics 20 (3), 305330.Google Scholar
Bond, Z. S. & Moore, Thomas J.. 1994. A note on the acoustic-phonetic characteristics of inadvertently clear speech. Speech Communication 14 (4), 324337.Google Scholar
Broersma, Mirjam. 2005. Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117 (6), 38903901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrd, Dani. 1992. Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92 (1), 593596.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani. 1993. 54,000 American stops. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 83, 97115.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani. 1994. Relations of sex and dialect on reduction. Speech Communication 15 (1/2), 3954.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong & McQueen, James M.. 2006. Phonological versus phonetic cues in native and non-native listening: Korean and Dutch listeners' perception of Dutch and English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (5), 30853096.Google Scholar
Ciocca, Valter,Wong, Livia & So, Lydia. 1994. An acoustic analysis of unreleased stop consonants in word-final position. 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, Japan, 1131–1134.Google Scholar
Cochrane, G. R. 1970. Some vowel durations in Australian English. Phonetica 22, 240250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Felicity. 2006a. Australian English pronunciation into the 21st century. Prospect 21 (1), 321.Google Scholar
Cox, Felicity. 2006b. The acoustic characteristics of /hVd/ vowels in the speech of some Australian teenagers. Australian Journal of Linguistics 26 (2), 147179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, Thomas H. & House, Arthur S.. 1988. Segmental duration in connected-speech signals: Current results. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83 (4), 15531573.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1987. The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15 (1), 4765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E. 1988. Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84 (1), 7079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, James E. 2003. Methods for assessing the perception of vowels in a second language. InFava, Elisabetta & Mioni, Alberto (eds.), Issues in clinical linguistics, 328. Padova: UniPress.Google Scholar
Flege, James E.,Birdsong, David, Bialystok, Ellen, Mack, Molly, Sung, Hyekyung & Tsukada, Kimiko. 2006. Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics 34 (2), 153175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E.,Bohn, Ocke-Schwen & Jang, Sungyoung. 1997. Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics 25 (4), 437470.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. & Fletcher, Kathryn L.. 1992. Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91 (1), 370389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, James E. & Liu, Serena. 2001. The effect of experience on adults' acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23 (4), 527552.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. & MacKay, Ian R. A.. 2004. Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (1), 134.Google Scholar
Flege, James E.,MacKay, Ian R. A. & Meador, Diane. 1999. Native Italian speakers' perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (5), 29732987.Google Scholar
Flege, James E.,Takagi, Naoyuki & Mann, Virginia. 1996. Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults' perception of /ɹ/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99 (2), 11611173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandour, Jack. 1984. Vowel duration in Thai. Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 2 (1), 5964.Google Scholar
Guion, Susan G. 2003. The vowel systems of Quichua–Spanish bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second languages. Phonetica 60 (2), 98128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guion, Susan G.,Flege, James E., Akahane-Yamada, Reiko & Pruitt, Jesica C.. 2000a. An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (5), 27112724.Google Scholar
Guion, Susan G.,Flege, James E. & Loftin, Jonathan D.. 2000b. The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 28 (1), 2742.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris,Hughes, George W. & Radley, Jean-Pierre A.. 1957. Acoustic properties of stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29 (1), 107116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallé, Pierre A.,Best, Catherine T. & Levitt, Andrea. 1999. Phonetic vs. phonological influences on French listeners' perception of American English approximants. Journal of Phonetics 27 (3), 281306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancin-Bhatt, Barbara. 2000. Optimality in second language phonology: Codas in Thai ESL. Second Language Research 16 (3), 201232.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan,Cox, Felicity & Evans, Zoe. 1997. An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17 (2), 155184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Householder, Fred W. Jr. 1956. Unreleased PTK in American English. InHalle, Morris, Lunt, Horace G., McLean, Hugh & van Schooneveld, Cornelis H.. (eds.), For Roman Jacobson, 235244. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael & Suchato, Atiwong. 2006. Issues in loanword adaptation: A case study from Thai. Lingua 116 (7), 921949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 2006. A course in phonetics. Boston, MA: Thomson/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Lado, Robert. 1957. Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lambacher, Stephen,Martens, William L., Nelson, Brian & Berman, Jonathan. 2001. Identification of English fricatives by Japanese listeners: The influence of vowel context on sensitivity and response bias. Acoustical Science and Technology 22 (5), 334343.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh. 1999. Perceiving final voiceless stops without release: Effects of preceding monophthongs versus nonmonophthongs. Phonetica 56 (1/2), 4455.Google Scholar
MacKay, Ian R. A.,Flege, James E., Piske, Thorsten & Schirru, Carlo. 2001. Category restructuring during second-language (L2) speech acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110 (1), 516528.Google Scholar
Malécot, André. 1958. The role of releases in the identification of released final stops. Language 34 (3), 370380.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Alexander G. 1946. The pronunciation of English in Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Oyama, Susan. 1976. A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5 (3), 261283.Google Scholar
Parker, Frank & Walsh, Thomas. 1981. Voicing cues as a function of tense/lax distinction in vowels. Journal of Phonetics 9, 353358.Google Scholar
Picheny, Michael A.,Durlach, Nathaniel I. & Braida, Louis D.. 1985. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 28 (1), 96103.Google Scholar
Picheny, Michael A.,Durlach, Nathaniel I. & Braida, Louis D.. 1986. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 29 (4), 434446.Google Scholar
Piske, Thorsten, Flege, James E. & MacKay, Ian R. A.. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29 (2), 191215.Google Scholar
Sancier, Michele C. & Fowler, Carol A.. 1997. Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics 25 (4), 421436.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, Joan G.,Levy-Berger, Gail & Haydon, Martin. 1985. Human Experimental Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tingsabadh, M. R. Kalaya & Abramson, Arthur S.. 1993. Thai. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 23 (1), 2428.Google Scholar
Tsukada, Kimiko. 2006. Cross-language perception of final stops in Thai and English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9 (3), 309318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsukada, Kimiko,Birdsong, David, Bialystok, Ellen, Mack, Molly, Sung, Hyekyung & Flege, James E.. 2005. A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics 33 (3), 263290.Google Scholar
Tsukada, Kimiko,Birdsong, David, Mack, Molly, Sung, Hyekyung, Bialystok, Ellen & Flege, James E.. 2004. Release bursts in English word-final voiceless stops produced by native English and Korean adults and children. Phonetica 61 (2/3), 6783.Google Scholar
Tsukada, Kimiko & Ishihara, Shunichi. 2007. The effect of first language (L1) in cross-language speech perception: Comparison of word-final stop discrimination by English, Japanese and Thai listeners. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 11 (1), 8292.Google Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. 1959. Transition and release as perceptual cues for final plosives. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2 (1), 6673.Google Scholar
Watson, Catherine I. & Harrington, Jonathan. 1999. Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (1), 458468.Google Scholar
Wayland, Ratree & Guion, Susan. 2003. Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naïve and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics 24 (1), 113129.Google Scholar
Wayland, Ratree P. & Guion, Susan G.. 2004. Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning 54 (4), 681712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar