Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Information:

  • Access
  • Cited by 27
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Butcher, Andrew 2008. Linguistic aspects of Australian Aboriginal English. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Vol. 22, Issue. 8, p. 625.

    Jones, Mark J. and McDougall, Kirsty 2009. The acoustic character of fricated /t/ in Australian English: A comparison with /s/ and //. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Vol. 39, Issue. 03, p. 265.

    Loakes, Deborah and McDougall, Kirsty 2010. Individual Variation in the Frication of Voiceless Plosives in Australian English: A Study of Twins' Speech. Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 30, Issue. 2, p. 155.

    Babel, Molly 2010. Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society, Vol. 39, Issue. 04, p. 437.

    Antoniou, Mark Best, Catherine T. Tyler, Michael D. and Kroos, Christian 2010. Language context elicits native-like stop voicing in early bilinguals’ productions in both L1 and L2. Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 38, Issue. 4, p. 640.

    2011. Illustrations of the IPA published in JIPA 1998–2010. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Vol. 41, Issue. 01, p. 127.

    Jones, Caroline Meakins, Felicity and Buchan, Heather 2011. Comparing Vowels in Gurindji Kriol and Katherine English: Citation Speech Data. Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 305.

    Antoniou, Mark Best, Catherine T. Tyler, Michael D. and Kroos, Christian 2011. Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 558.

    TSUKADA, KIMIKO 2012. Comparison of native versus nonnative perception of vowel length contrasts in Arabic and Japanese. Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 33, Issue. 03, p. 501.

    Tsukada, Kimiko 2012. Non-native Japanese listeners’ perception of vowel length contrasts in Japanese and Modern Standard Arabic (MSA). Second Language Research, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 151.

    Antoniou, Mark Tyler, Michael D. and Best, Catherine T. 2012. Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode?. Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 40, Issue. 4, p. 582.

    2012. Illustrations of the IPA published in JIPA 1998–2011. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Vol. 42, Issue. 01, p. 117.

    Yuen, Ivan Cox, Felicity and Demuth, Katherine 2014. Three-year-olds' production of Australian English phonemic vowel length as a function of prosodic context. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 135, Issue. 3, p. 1469.

    Tyler, Michael D. Best, Catherine T. Goldstein, Louis M. and Antoniou, Mark 2014. Investigating the role of articulatory organs and perceptual assimilation in infants' discrimination of native and non-native fricative place contrasts. Developmental Psychobiology, Vol. 56, Issue. 2, p. 210.

    Baker, Brett Bundgaard-Nielsen, Rikke and Graetzer, Simone 2014. The Obstruent Inventory of Roper Kriol. Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 307.

    Cox, Felicity Palethorpe, Sallyanne and Bentink, Samantha 2014. Phonetic Archaeology and 50 Years of Change to Australian English /iː/. Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 50.

    Escudero, Paola Best, Catherine T. Kitamura, Christine and Mulak, Karen E. 2014. Magnitude of phonetic distinction predicts success at early word learning in native and non-native accents. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5, Issue. ,

    Stevens, Mary and Harrington, Jonathan 2014. The individual and the actuation of sound change. Loquens, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. e003.

    Schmalz, Xenia Marinus, Eva Robidoux, Serje Palethorpe, Sallyanne Castles, Anne and Coltheart, Max 2014. Quantifying the reliance on different sublexical correspondences in German and English. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 26, Issue. 8, p. 831.

    van Heugten, Marieke Krieger, Dena R. and Johnson, Elizabeth K. 2015. The Developmental Trajectory of Toddlers’ Comprehension of Unfamiliar Regional Accents. Language Learning and Development, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 41.

    ×

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Australian English
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Australian English
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Australian English
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

Australian English is a regional dialect of English which shares its phonemic inventory with Southern British English through the historical connection with the dialects of the British Isles (in particular London) in the late 18th and early 19th centuries (Cochrane 1989, Yallop 2003, Leitner 2004). Speakers of present-day Australian English are typically those who are born in Australia or who immigrate at an early age when peer influence is maximal.1 Such speakers fall into three major dialect subgroups: Standard Australian English, Aboriginal English and Ethnocultural Australian English varieties. Standard Australian English (SAusE) is the dominant dialect and is used by the vast majority of speakers. It is a salient marker of national identity, and is used in broadcasting and in public life. The Aboriginal and Ethnocultural varieties are minority dialects allowing speakers to express their cultural identity within the multicultural Australian context (Cox & Palethorpe 2006, Clyne, Eisikovits & Tollfree 2001).

The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of the main features of SAusE. Like all spoken dialects, sociodemographically and stylistically significant accent variation is present in the community. Such variation is chiefly associated with vowel realisation, however, connected speech processes and suprasegmental characteristics also play an extremely important role (see for instance, Ingram 1989, Tollfree 2001). The specific detail of these sociostylistic variations present in the dialect will not be offered here as much more work is still required before a solid empirical picture of such variation can be presented. The accent variation that is present amongst speakers of SAusE has traditionally been described with reference to a continuum of broadness, ranging from the most overtly local form (Broad) through to that which bears some resemblance to Received Pronunciation of British English (Cultivated) (Mitchell & Delbridge 1965). Over the past 40 years, there has been a gradual movement of speakers away from the extremities of this broadness continuum (Horvath 1985) reflecting recent sociocultural change in Australia including post-colonial independence and sociopolitical maturity. The majority of younger speakers today prefer to select speech patterns from the central or General part of the broadness continuum (Harrington, Cox & Evans 1997).

By global standards, SAusE displays relative regional homogeneity which may be the result of quite recent white settlement but may also reflect national identity as a stronger psychosocial influence than regional affiliation (Blair 1993). Recent analyses have, however, revealed some minor regionally distributed contextual variation such as the probabilistic occurrence of vocalised /l/, pre-lateral and pre-nasal vowel modifications, and certain other vowel characteristics (see, for instance, Oasa 1989; Cox & Palethorpe 1998, 2004; Horvath & Horvath 2002; Palethorpe & Cox 2003; Butcher 2006). The speaker on the accompanying recorded example which forms the basis of the transcription below is a 31-year-old male who was born in Victoria but now lives in Sydney.

Consonants

Consonantal features have been studied far less rigorously than vowel features (but see Ingram 1989 and Tollfree 2001). This is because the consonants display many of the same variations present in other major dialects of English. There are voicing distinctions between stops, affricates and fricatives (except /h/). Syllable-initial voiceless stops are aspirated before vowels in stressed syllables. Voiceless stops are unaspirated when following /s/ in the same syllable. In unstressed and in coda contexts, voiceless stops are usually only weakly aspirated and phase-final codas are often unreleased (Ingram 1989). However, there is variation in the degree of aspiration with some speakers inclined to quite strongly aspirate voiceless stops in these contexts, and spirantisation with little closure may also occur, particularly in formal style (Tollfree 2001). Nasal and lateral release of stops preceding homorganic nasals and laterals within or across word boundaries is usual. Syllable-final /t/ preceding an obstruent is typically unreleased. Flapping and glottal reinforcement2 of alveolar stops occur variably according to stylistic requirements or speaker-specific idiosyncratic patterns and are not usually obligatory (Ingram 1989). Flapping of /t/ and /d/ is tolerated in intervocalic position word-internally preceding weak vowels (as in butter [bɐɾə], water [woːɾə], ladder [læɾə]) and across word boundaries (as in get out [ɡeɾæɔṭ], ride on [ɹɑeɾɔn]) (Evans 2003). Flaps may also occur for /t/ before syllabic /l/ and /m/ (as in cattle [khæɾ

], bottle [bɔɾ

], bottom [bɔɾ

]) and before unstressed vowels following /n/ (Tollfree 2001). Glottal stops may function as allophones of /t/ (glottalling) in syllable-final position before syllabic /n/ and other non-syllabic sonorants (for example, button [bɐʔ

], cotton [khɔʔ

], butler [bɐʔlə], light rain [lɑeʔɹæɪn] or not now [nɔʔnæɔ]) (Tollfree 2001). It is very unusual for glottal stops to replace /t/ intervocalically, before syllabic /l/ or /m/, or in pre-pausal position. Glottal reinforcement (glottalisation) of voiceless stops is, however, often found, particularly in syllable-final non-pre-vocalic environments, and is commonly accompanied by laryngealisation (Tollfree 2001). For unreleased phrase-final stops, voicing is determined primarily by preceding vowel duration because voiced stops do not typically display periodicity during closure except in intervocalic environments. When final stops are released, the separate closure and burst durations of voiceless stops are greater than for voiced stops (Cox & Palethorpe 2006).

/l/ is realised as [ɫ] in pre-pausal and pre-consonantal positions and is often dark before a morpheme boundary preceding a vowel. There is some suggestion that AusE onset /l/ is more dorsal (i.e. darker) than other varieties of English (Wells 1982) although this is yet to be empirically tested. /l/ vocalisation may occur for some speakers in pre-consonantal, syllable-final, and syllabic contexts in words like milk [mɪʊk], hurl [hɜːʊ] and noodle [nʉːdʊ] (Borowsky & Horvarth 1997, Borowsky 2001). Vocalisation has the effect of reducing the contrast between certain V and VC syllables such that howl [hæɔɫ] and how [hæɔ] may become homophonous (Palethorpe & Cox 2003). There is also a regionally distributed pattern for this variant with proportionately more speakers from South Australia using vocalised /l/ (Ingram 1989, Horvath & Horvath 2002).

The palatal approximant /j/ is present after coronals before /ʉː/ (as in new [njʉː]) and when /j/ occurs in alveolar stop or fricatives clusters, yod coalescence typically results such that tune [tːn] → [tʃːn], dune [dːn] → [dʒːn] and assume [əsːm] → [əʃːm]. Palatalisation may vary stylistically for some speakers and may also act as a social marker (Horvath 1985).

/r/ is realised as an alveolar approximant [ɹ] with a voiceless allophone occurring in clusters initiated by a stop or fricative. Approximants are generally devoiced following voiceless stops and fricatives but devoicing does not occur when stops are preceded by /s/ (for instance, prey [pæe], but spray [spɹæe]). /tr/ and /dr/ clusters are typically affricated. SAusE is non-rhotic as it does not contain pre-pausal or pre-consonantal /r/. However, in connected speech, linking /r/ (far out [fɐː æɔt] → [fɐːɹæɔt]) is typical, both within words and across word boundaries. Intrusive/epenthetic /r/ (draw it [dɹoː ət] → [dɹoːɹət], draw [dɹoː] → drawing [dɹoːɹŋ]) is also commonly found. There may be a recent change in progress towards repressing /r/ sandhi as part of a more generalised development affecting the liaison rules that have typically been used for hiatus-breaking of two separate adjacent vowels. Such repression of sandhi involves the substitution of a glottal stop for previously common liaison elements. For example, the egg [ðiː(j)eɡ] → [ðəʔeɡ], to eat [tʉː(w)iːt] → [təʔiːt]. No empirical investigation of this phenomenon in SAusE has occurred to date.

Vowels

The symbols in vowel-space figures and in the left-hand column of the vowel table are from Harrington et al. (1997). This is a revised symbol set for SAusE which was developed to indicate phonetic properties of the vowels more accurately than the earlier system recommended by Mitchell (1946). The Mitchell (1946) transcription system for vowels more strongly reflects a British rather than an Australian standard due to its historical origins (Clark 1989, Durie & Hajek 1994, Harrington et al. 1997, Ingram 1995). The revised symbol set adheres to the IPA principle of selecting symbols to represent phonemes that are closest to the corresponding cardinal vowels. It also allows for a more representative picture of SAusE vowel sounds and can provide a solid basis for a detailed phonetic transcription of the variations that are present in the speech community. No detail of the range of phonetic vowel variations present in SAusE is given as this is beyond the scope of the illustration; however, according to Harrington et al. (1997), Broad speakers differ from General speakers primarily with respect to the first element of the diphthongs. In particular, Broad speakers have a more retracted first element of the /ɑe/ vowel (e.g. high) and a more fronted and raised first element of the /æɔ/ vowel (e.g. how). Another vowel that varies systematically with broadness is /iː/, as in heed. This vowel typically displays onglide (delayed target) in SAusE giving it a diphthongal quality [əiː], however the extent and duration of the glide varies considerably and is generally more pronounced amongst the broader speakers (Harrington et al. 1997). In SAusE, /iː/ occurs in word-final position in city [sɪtiː]/[sɪɾiː] and happy [hæpiː].

Short vowels are approximately 60% the length of long vowels and diphthongs in standard /hVd/ contexts (Cox 2006). Length is explicitly indicated in the transcription system used above as it has contrastive status for some pairs of vowels (for example, /ɐː/ – /ɐ/ as in cart [khɐːt] versus cut [khɐt] and /iː/ – /ɪ/ as in bead [bə] versus bid [bɪ], although this pair also has an additional onglide contrast present in /iː/ as discussed above). The loss of centring glide in many contexts for the centring diphthongs has also resulted in a length contrast between /eː/ – /e/ as in bared [beː] versus bed [be] and /ɪ/ – /ɪə/ as in bid [bɪ] versus beard [bɪə]. /ɪə/ (hear [hɪə]) and /eː/ (hair [heː]) have starting points similar to /ɪ/ and /e/, respectively, and, for younger speakers, are often long monophthongs (particularly in closed syllables) or diphthongs with a variable centring glide. It is not uncommon for /ɪə/ and /eː/ in open syllables to be produced as a disyllabic sequence incorporating a full vowel and an unstressed second syllable which has variable realisation often approaching [ɐ], for instance in hear [hɪːɐ] (Harrington et al. 1997). The centring diphthong /ʊə/, previously occurring in pure and sure, is infrequently found in the speech of young people and has therefore not been included in the list of phonemes. Words such as pure are typically produced with a disyllabic structure [pʉːə], and /oː/ is used in words like sure [ʃoː] resulting in a homophone with shore [ʃoː]. There are some, mainly older speakers, who do continue to use /ʊə/.

Schwa has not been indicated owing to its contextual phonetic variability. However, it occurs as the most common vowel in unstressed syllables and does not functionally contrast with /ɪ/ in this context. Words such as rabbit [ɹæbət], carrot [khæɹət], roses [ɹəʉzə] and Rosa's [ɹəʉzə] all include schwa in the second syllable.

Vowel qualities displayed in the formant plots in figures 13 are based on observations of five young adult males from Sydney. The monophthong plot is from vowels in the /hVd/ context and the diphthong plots are from vowels in the /hV/ context. /hV/ has been used for diphthongs to prevent the potential coarticulatory effect of /d/ on the second target.

Various pre-nasal and pre-lateral vowel effects are common in SAusE. /əʉ/ as in coat [khəʉt] becomes [ɔo] before velarised /l/ (coal [khɔoɫ]). Therefore, words like dole [dɔoɫ] and doll [dɔɫ] contrast primarily by vowel duration rather than quality (Palethorpe & Cox 2003). Retraction of /ʉː/ often occurs before [ɫ] so that pull [phʊɫ] and pool [phuːɫ] become differentiated primarily by length whereas in non-lateral contexts such as who'd [hʉːd] and hood [hʊd] there is an additional fronting contrast. The retraction of /ʉː/ before /l/ is considered a regionally distributed feature in SAusE (Oasa 1989), but recent change in progress has seen an increased use of this variant among younger speakers generally, thereby reducing the strength of the variant as a regional marker.

There is a further regionally distributed effect for /e/ before [ɫ] which is lowered so that hell and Hal become homophonous for some speakers from Victoria (Cox & Palethorpe 2004). Epenthetic schwa occurs when long high front vowels and front rising diphthongs occur before velarised or vocalised /l/, as in words like hile [hɑeəɫ] and heel [həəɫ] (Palethorpe & Cox 2003). In pre-nasal environments, variable raising of /æ/ (and the first element of /æɔ/) may occur such that can [hæːn] approaches Ken [hːn] but retains the length of the lower vowel (Cox, Palethorpe & Tsukada 2004).

Figure 1 Monophthong vowel formant plot based on citation form /hVd/ words from five male speakers.

Figure 2 Diphthong formant trajectory plot from target 1 to target 2 for the vowels /æɪ/, /əʉ/ and /oɪ/ superimposed onto the monophthong vowel space. Values are from citation form /hV/ words from five male speakers.

Figure 3 Diphthong formant trajectory plot from target 1 to target 2 for the vowels /æɔ/, /ɑe/, /ɪə/ and /eː/ superimposed onto the monophthong vowel space. Values are from citation form /hV/ words from five male speakers.

Suprasegmentals

There has been much interest in the increasing occurrence over the past 30 years of the intonational device known as the high rising terminal (HRT) or tune in Australian English. The HRT is considered a sociophonetically marked intonational pattern associated with declarative utterances which has a particular collaborative function in discourse structure. It may be present in the speech of both males and females (McGregor 2006) but it is important to recognise that HRT users also employ standard falling and fall-rise tunes (Fletcher & Harrington 2001, Fletcher, Stirling, Wales & Mushin 2002, Fletcher, Grabe & Warren 2004).

Transcription of recorded passage

Broad phonemic and narrow phonetic transcriptions are provided. The broad transcription uses vowel symbols from the revised transcription system of Harrington et al. (1997). The narrow transcription provides more detail of allophonic variation and connected speech processes that occur in Standard Australian English.

Broad transcription

Narrow transcription

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to JF for providing the voice for the illustration, to Chris Callaghan for recording the speech samples, to Helen Fraser for early discussions about this illustration and to John Ingram and Andy Butcher for their valuable comments and insights.

References

Blair, D. (1993). Australian English and Australian identity. In Schultz, G. (ed.), The Languages of Australia (Occasional Paper, Australian Academy of the Humanities Symposium 14), 62–70. Canberra: Highland Press.
Blair, D. & Collins, P. (eds.) (2001). Varieties of English Around the World: English in Australia. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Borowsky, T. (2001). The vocalisation of dark l in Australian English. In Blair, & Collins, (eds.), 69–88.
Borowsky, T. & Horvath, B. (1997). L-vocalisation in Australian English. In Hinskens, F., van Hout, R. & Wetzels, W. L. (eds.), Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, 101123. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Butcher, A. (2006). Formant frequencies of /hVd/ vowels in the speech of South Australian females. Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 449–453. http://www.assta.org/sst/2006/ (accessed 25 April 2007).
Clark, J. E. (1989). Some proposals for a revised phonetic transcription of Australian English. In Collins, & Blair, (eds.), 205–213.
Clyne, M., Eisikovits, E. & Tollfree, L. (2001). Ethnic varieties of Australian English. In Blair, & Collins, (eds.), 223–238.
Cochrane, G. R. (1989). Origins and development of the Australian accent. In Collins, & Blair, (eds.), 176–186.
Collins, P. & Blair, D. (eds.) (1989). Australian English: The Language of a New Society. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
Cox, F. M. (1996). An Acoustic Study of Vowel Variation in Australian English. Ph.D. dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney.
Cox, F. M. (2006). The acoustic characteristics of /hVd/ vowels in the speech of some Australian teenagers. Australian Journal of Linguistics 26, 147179.
Cox, F. M. & Palethorpe, S. (1998). Regional variation in the vowels of female adolescents from Sydney. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP, Sydney, 30 November–4 December. 4 pages, CD_ROM.
Cox, F. & Palethorpe, S. (2004). The border effect: vowel differences across the NSW/Victorian border. In Moskovsky, C. (ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society. http://www.als.asn.au/ (accessed 5 March 2007).
Cox, F. & Palethorpe, S. (2006). A preliminary acoustic phonetic examination of Lebanese Australian English. In Cupples, L. (ed.), Abstracts of the 15th Australian Language and Speech Conference. Australian Journal of Psychology 58, 5.
Cox, F., Palethorpe, S. & Tsukada, K. (2004). One hundred years of accent change in Australian English. Presented at the 10th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Sydney, 6–10 December.
Durie, M. & Hajek, J. (1994). A revised standard phonemic orthography for Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics 14, 93107.
Evans, Z. (2003). Hyperspeech and Hypospeech in Multiple Dialects of English: An Acoustic and Articulatory Study. Ph.D. dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney.
Fletcher, J., Grabe, E. & Warren, P. (2004). Intonational variation in four dialects of English: the high rising tune. In Sun-Ah, Jun (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 390409. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fletcher, J. & Harrington, J. (2001). High-rising terminals and fall-rise tunes in Australian English. Phonetica 58, 215229.
Fletcher, J., Stirling, L., Wales, R. & Mushin, I. (2002). Rising intonation and dialogue acts in Australian English. Language and Speech 45, 229254.
Ingram, J. (1989). Connected speech processes in Australian English. In Bradley, D., Sussex, R. D. & Scott, G. K. (eds.), Studies in Australian English, 2149. Bundoora: Department of Linguistics, La Trobe University Victoria for the Australian Linguistic Society.
Ingram, J. (1995). One step forward and two backwards: reflections on Durie and Hajek's proposed revisions to the phonemic transcription of Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics 15, 215239.
Harrington, J., Cox, F. & Evans, Z. (1997). An acoustic phonetic study of Broad, General and Cultivated Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17, 155184.
Horvath, B. (1985). Variation in Australian English: The Sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horvath, B. & Horvath, R. (2002). The geolinguistics of /l/ vocalisation in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6, 319346.
Leitner, G. (2004). Beyond Mitchell's views on the history of Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 24, 99125.
McGregor, J. (2006). High Rising Tunes in Australian English. Ph.D. dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney.
Mitchell, A. (1946). The Pronunciation of English in Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
Mitchell, A. G. & Delbridge, A. (1965). The Pronunciation of English in Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.
Oasa, H. (1989). The phonology of current Adelaide English. In Collins, & Blair, (eds.), 271–287.
Palethorpe, S. & Cox, F. M. (2003). Vowel modification in pre-lateral environments. Poster presented at the International Seminars on Speech Production, Sydney, 7–10 December.
Tollfree, L. (2001). Variation and change in Australian English consonants. In Blair, & Collins, (eds.), 45–67.
Wells, J. (1982). Accents of English: Beyond the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yallop, C. (2003). A. G. Mitchell and the development of Australian pronunciation. Australian Journal of Linguistics 23, 129141.

1 The term ‘Australian English’ has previously been used more restrictively to describe the dialect of the primarily Anglo-Celtic population of Australian speakers (Cox 1996). In this paper we take a more inclusive approach and use the term Australian English more liberally to apply to the dialects of all speakers who are born in and grow up in Australia. The term ‘Standard Australian English’ is considered a sub-class of Australian English and refers to the majority dialect which contrasts with the other Australian English dialects: Aboriginal English and Ethnocultural varieties.

2 We use the term glottal reinforcement to refer to the addition of a glottal gesture along with the supralaryngeal gesture such that the supralaryngeal gesture is not obscured. It does not refer to the loss of supralaryngeal gesture and apparent replacement with a glottal stop (glottalling). We acknowledge that the two processes may be from different parts of a continuum involving the relative timing of laryngeal and supralaryngeal gestures.