Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The articulatory and acoustic characteristics of Polish sibilants and their consequences for diachronic change

  • Véronique Bukmaier (a1) and Jonathan Harrington (a1)

Abstract

The study is concerned with the relative synchronic stability of three contrastive sibilant fricatives /s ʂ ɕ/ in Polish. Tongue movement data were collected from nine first-language Polish speakers producing symmetrical real and non-word CVCV sequences in three vowel contexts. A Gaussian model was used to classify the sibilants from spectral information in the noise and from formant frequencies at vowel onset. The physiological analysis showed an almost complete separation between /s ʂ ɕ/ on tongue-tip parameters. The acoustic analysis showed that the greater energy at higher frequencies distinguished /s/ in the fricative noise from the other two sibilant categories. The most salient information at vowel onset was for /ɕ/, which also had a strong palatalizing effect on the following vowel. Whereas either the noise or vowel onset was largely sufficient for the identification of /s ɕ/ respectively, both sets of cues were necessary to separate /ʂ/ from /s ɕ/. The greater synchronic instability of /ʂ/ may derive from its high articulatory complexity coupled with its comparatively low acoustic salience. The data also suggest that the relatively late stage of /ʂ/ acquisition by children may come about because of the weak acoustic information in the vowel for its distinction from /s/.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The articulatory and acoustic characteristics of Polish sibilants and their consequences for diachronic change
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The articulatory and acoustic characteristics of Polish sibilants and their consequences for diachronic change
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The articulatory and acoustic characteristics of Polish sibilants and their consequences for diachronic change
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bladon, Anthony, Clark, Christopher & Mickey, Katrina. 1987. Production and perception of sibilant fricatives: Shona data. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 17, 3965.
Brown, Keith (ed.). 2006. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn., 351355. Oxford: Elsevier.
Bukmaier, Véronique, Harrington, Jonathan, Reubold, Ulrich & Kleber, Felicitas. 2014. Synchronic variation in the articulation and the acoustics of the Polish place distinction in sibilants and its implications for diachronic change. 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2014), Singapore.
Cheon, Sang Y. & Anderson, Victoria B.. 2008. Acoustic and perceptual similarities between English and Korean sibilants: Implications for second language acquisition. Korean Linguistics 14, 4164.
Chuang, Yu-Ying & Fon, Janice. 2010. The effect of dental and retroflex sibilants in Taiwan Mandarin spontaneous speech. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody, No. 100414.
Delattre, Pierre C., Liberman, Alvin M. & Cooper, Franklin S.. 1962. Formant transitions and loci as acoustic correlates of place of articulation in American fricatives. Studia Linguistica 16, 104121.
Duanmu, San. 2006. Chinese (Mandarin): Phonology. In Brown (ed.), 351–355.
Evers, Vincent, Reetz, Henning & Lahiri, Aditi. 1998. Crosslinguistic acoustic categorization of sibilants independent of phonological status. Journal of Phonetics 26, 345370.
Fant, Gunnar. 1960. Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.
Forrest, Karen, Weismer, Gary, Milenkovic, Paul & Dougall, Ronald D.. 1988. Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: Preliminary data. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 84, 115123.
Fujisaki, Hiroya & Kunisaki, Osamu. 1978. Analysis, recognition, and perception of voicleless fricative consonants in Japanese. IEEE Transactions (ASSP) 26, 2127.
Gordon, Matthew, Barthmaier, Paul & Sands, Kathy. 2002. A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32, 141174.
Gussmann, Edmund. 2007. The phonology of Polish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halle, Morris & Stevens, Kenneth N.. 1997. The postalveolar fricative of Polish. In Kiritani, Shigeru, Hirose, Hajime & Fujisaki, Hiroshi (eds.), Speech production and language: In honour of Osamu Fujimura, 177193. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hamann, Silke. 2002a. Retroflexion and retraction revised. In Hall, Tracy A., Pompino-Marschall, Bernd & Rochoń, Marzena (eds.), Papers on phonetics and phonology: The articulation, acoustics and perception of consonants (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 28), 1326. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS).
Hamann, Silke. 2002b. Postalveolar fricatives in Slavic languages as retroflexes. In Baauw, Sergio, Huiskes, Mike & Schoorlemmer, Maaike (eds.), OTS yearbook 2002, 105127. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics.
Harrington, Jonathan. 2010. Phonetic analysis of speech corpora. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Harris, Kathrine S. 1958. Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables. Language and Speech 1, 17.
Heinz, Jeff & Stevens, Kenneth N.. 1961. On the properties of fricative consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33, 589593.
Hoole, Phil, Bombien, Lasse, Kühnert, Barbara & Mooshammer, Christine. 2009. Intrinsic and prosodic effects on articulatory coordination in initial consonant clusters. In Fant, Gunnar, Fujisaki, Hiroshi & Shen, Jiaxuan (eds.), Frontiers in phonetics and speech science: Festschrift for Wu Zongji, 275286. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Hoole, P. & Andreas, Zierdt. 2010. Five-dimensional articulography. In Maassen, Ben & van Lieshout, Pascal H. H. M. (eds.), Speech motor control: New developments in basic and applied research, 331349. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoole, Phil & Mooshammer, Christine. 2002. Articulatory analysis of the German vowel system. In Auer, Peter, Gilles, Peter & Spiekemann, Helmut (eds.), Silbenschnitt und Tonakzente, 129152.
Hu, Fang. 2008. The three sibilants in Standard Chinese. Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP 2008), 105–108.
Jassem, Wiktor. 1995. The acoustic parameters of Polish voiceless fricatives: Analysis of variance. Phonetica 52, 252258.
Jesus, Luis M. T. & Shadle, Christine H.. 2002. A parametric study of the spectral characteristics of European Portuguese fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 30, 437464.
Jongman, Allard. 1989. Duration of fricative noise required for identification of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85, 17181725.
Jongman, Allard, Wayland, Ratree & Wong, Serena. 2000. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108 (3), 12521263.
Ladefoged, Peter & Bhaskararao, Peri. 1983. Non-quantal aspects of consonant production: A study of retroflex consonants. Journal of Phonetics 11, 291302.
Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Vowels and consonants. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
LaRiviere, Conrad, Winitz, Harris & Herriman, Eve. 1975. The distribution of perceptual cues in English prevocalic fricatives. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18, 613622.
Li, Fangfang, Edwards, Jan & Beckman, Mary E.. 2007. Spectral measures for sibilant fricatives of English, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVI), vol. 4, 917–920.
Li, Fangfang, Munson, Ben, Edwards, Jan, Yoneyama, Kiyoko & Hall, Kathleen C.. 2011. Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: Implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, 9991011.
Lindblom, Björn. 1998. Systemic constraints and adaptive change in the formation of sound structure. In Hurford, James R., Studdert-Kennedy, Michael & Chris, Knight (eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and cognitive bases, 242264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lisker, Leigh. 2001. Hearing the Polish sibilants [s š ś]: Phonetic and auditory judgements. In Grønnum, Nina & Rischel, Jørgen (eds.), To honour Eli Fischer-Jørgensen (Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague XXX), 226238.
Łobacz, Piotra. 1996. Polska fonologia dziecięca [Polish child phonology]. Warszawa: Energeia.
Lobanov, Boris. 1971. Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 606608.
Łukaszewicz, Beata. 2006. Extrasyllabicity, transparency and prosodic constituency in the acquisition of Polish. Lingua 116, 130.
Łukaszewicz, Beata. 2007. Reduction in syllable onsets in the acquisition of Polish: Deletion coalescence, metathesis, and gemination. Journal of the Child Language 34 (1), 5282.
Mandera, Paweł, Keuleers, Emmanuel, Wodniecka, Zofia & Brysbaert, Marc. 2014. Subtlex-pl: Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish. Behavior Research Methods 47 (2), 471483.
Maniwa, Kazumi, Jongman, Allard & Wade, Thomas. 2009. Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 125 (6), 39623973.
Mann, Virgina & Repp, Bruno. 1980. Influence of vocalic context on the perception of the [ʃ]–[s] distinction. Perception & Psychophysics 28, 213228.
McGuire, Grant. 2007. English listeners’ perception of Polish alveopalatal and retroflex voiceless sibilants: A pilot study (UC Berkley Phonology Lab Annual Report).
Narayanan, Shrikanth, Alwan, Abeer & Haker, Katherine. 1995. An articulatory study of fricative consonants using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 98 (3), 13251347.
Nittrouer, Susan. 1992. Age-related differences in perceptual effect of formant transitions within syllables and across syllable boundaries. Journal of Phonetics 20, 132.
Nittrouer, Susan. 2002. Learning to perceive speech: How fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112, 711719.
Nittrouer, Susan & Studdert-Kennedy, Michael. 1987. The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 30, 319329.
Nowak, Pawel M. 2006. The role of vowel transitions and frication noise in the perception of Polish sibilants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34, 139152.
Percival, Donald B. & Walden, Andrew T.. 1993. Spectral analysis for physical applications: Multitaper and conventional univariate techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Proctor, Michael, Lu, Li H., Zhu, Yinghua, Goldstein, Louis & Narayanan, Shrikanth. 2012. Articulation of Mandarin sibilants: A multi-plane realtime MRI study. Proceedings of the 14th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Sydney, Australia.
Reidy, Patrick F. 2015. A comparison of spectral estimation methods for the analysis of sibilant fricatives. JASA Express Letters 137 (4), EL248–EL254.
Sawicka, Irena. 1995. Fonologia [Phonology]. In Wróbel, Henryk (ed.), Gramatyka wspóɫczesnego języka poskiego: Fonetyka i fonologia [A grammar of contemporary Polish: Phonetics and phonology], 105194. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Języka Polskiego.
Schiel, Florian. 2004. MAUS goes iterative. Proceedings of the IVth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal, 1015–1018.
Shadle, Christine H. 2006. Acoustic phonetics. In Brown (ed.), 442–460.
Shadle, Christine H. 2010. The aerodynamics of speech. In Hardcastle, William J. & Laver, John (eds.) The handbook of phonetic sciences, 3980, Blackwell: Oxford.
Shadle, Christine H. 2012. The acoustic and aerodynamics of fricatives. In Cohn, Abigail C., Fougeron, Cécile & Huffman, Marie K. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology, 511526. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shadle, Christine H. & Mair, Sheila J.. 1996. Quantifying spectral characteristics of fricatives. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 96), Philadelphia, PA, 1517–1520.
Soli, Sigfrid D. 1981. Second formants in fricatives: Acoustic consequences of fricative vowel coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 70, 976984.
Srivastava, Anuj, Jermyn, Ian & Joshi, Shantanu. 2007. Riemannian analysis of probability density functions with applications in vision. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2007), 1–8.
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thomson, David J. 1982. Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE 70 (9), 10551096.
Toda, Martine, Maeda, Shinji & Honda, Kiyoshi. 2010. Formant-cavity affiliation in sibilant fricatives. In Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine & Żygis, Marzena (eds.), Turbulent sounds: An interdisciplinary guide, 343374. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
van Heuven, Walter J. B., Mandera, Paweł, Keuleers, Emmanuel & Brysbaert, Marc. 2014. SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6), 11761190.
Wagner, Anita, Ernestus, Mirjam & Cutler, Anne. 2006. Formant transitions in fricative identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (4), 22672277.
Whalen, Douglas H. 1991. Perception of the English /s/–/∫/ distinction relies on fricative noises and transitions, not on brief spectral slices. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90 (4), 17761785.
Żygis, Marzena & Hamann, Silke. 2003. Perceptual and acoustic cues of Polish coronal fricatives. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XV), Barcelona, 3–9 August, 395–398.
Żygis, Marzena, Pape, Daniel & Jesus, Luis M. T.. 2012a. (Non)retroflex Slavic affricates and their motivation: Evidence from Czech and Polish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 42 (3), 281329.
Żygis, Marzena, Pape, Daniel & Czaplicki, Bartłomiej. 2012b. Dynamics in sibilant systems: Standard Polish and its dialects (Phonetik & Phonologie 8). Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.
Żygis, Marzena, Pape, Daniel, Jesus, Luis M. T. & Jaskuła, Marek. 2014a. Intended intonation of statements and polar questions in whispered, semi-whispered and normal speech modes. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, Dublin, 678–682.
Żygis, Marzena, Pape, Daniel, Jesus, Luis M. T. & Jaskuła, Marek. 2014b. How do voiceless consonant clusters contribute to intended intonation? A comparison of normal, whispered, and semi-whispered speech. Proceedings of the 10th International Seminar on Speech Production, Cologne, 476–480.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed