Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:23:57.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Baseline Differences in Long-term Survivors and Nonsurvivors of the Colorado/Columbia Fetal Implant Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2021

Cynthia McRae*
Affiliation:
Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver
Michelle Dunk
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Dan Russell
Affiliation:
Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University
Heiner Ellgring
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Wuerzburg
Yaakov Stern
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center
Paul Greene
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine
Stanley Fahn
Affiliation:
Neurological Institute, Columbia University Medical Center
Claire Henchcliffe
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Cynthia McRae, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver, Denver, CO80208, USA. Email: cynthia.mcrae@du.edu

Abstract

Objective:

This study is based on long-term follow-up of participants in a randomized double-blind sham surgery-controlled trial (1995–1999) designed to determine the effectiveness of implantation of human embryonic mesencephalic tissue containing dopamine neuron precursors into the brains of patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). We investigated differences between long-term survivors and nonsurvivors at baseline in order to contribute to information regarding optimal patient selection for upcoming stem cell trials.

Method:

Forty participants were randomly assigned to receive either neural implantation or sham surgery. Thirty-four patients who ultimately received the implant were followed periodically with the most recent assessment occurring in 2015–2016. Demographic information, neurological measures, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, neuropsychological assessments, and a personality assessment were included in the current analyses. T-tests were used to compare survivors and nonsurvivors. Logistic regression analyses examined predictors of survivorship.

Results:

Five of six survivors were female. They were younger than nonsurvivors (p = .03) and more neuropsychologically “intact” across a broad range of cognitive areas (significance levels ranged from <.001 to .045). There were no differences between survivors and nonsurvivors off medications at baseline on neurological or PET assessments. Survivors reported more “Openness to Experience” (p = .004) than nonsurvivors. Using empirically derived predictor variables, results of logistic regression analyses indicated that Animal Naming (cognitive task) and Openness to Experience (personality variable) were the strongest predictors of survivorship.

Conclusions:

Variables to consider when selecting participants for future cell-based therapies include being “intact” neuropsychologically, level of Openness to Experience, younger age, and inclusion of women.

Type
Regular Research
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austad, S.N. (2006). Why women live longer than men: Sex differences in longevity. Gender Medicine, 3, 7992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barford, A., Dorling, D., Davey Smith, G., & Shaw, M. (2006). Life expectancy: women now on top everywhere. BMJ, 332(7545), 808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, R.A., Studer, L., Cattaneo, E., Takahashi, J., & G_Force PD Consortium (2015). G-Force PD: A global initiative in coordinating stem cell-based dopamine treatments for Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinson’s Disease, 1, 15017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, R.A., Parmar, M., Studer, L., & Takahashi, J. (2017). Human trials of stem cell-derived dopamine neurons for Parkinson’s disease: Dawn of a new era. Cell Stem Cell, 21(5), 569573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benton, A.L. (1955). The Visual Retention Test. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Cerri, S., Mus, L., & Blandini, F. (2019). Parkinson’s disease in women and men: What’s the difference? Journal of Parkinson's Disease, 9, 501515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chetty, R., Stepner, M., Abraham, S., Lin, S., Scuderi, B., Turner, N., … Cutler, D. (2016). The association between income and life expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014. JAMA, 315(16), 17501766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.T. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Delis, D.C., Massman, P.J., Kaplan, E., McKee, R., Kramer, J.H., & Gettman, D. (1991). Alternate form of the California Verbal Learning Test: Development and reliability. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 5, 154162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dermody, S.S, Wright, A.G.C., Cheong, J.W., Miller, K.G., Muldoon, M.F., Flory, J.D., … Manuck, S.B. (2016). Personality correlates of midlife cardiometabolic risk: The explanatory role of higher-order factors of the five factor model. Journal of Personality, 84(6), 765776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeYoung, C.G., Peterson, J.B., & Higgins, D.M. (2005). Sources of Openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeYoung, C.G., Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F.A., Gray, J.R., Eastman, M., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2011). Sources of cognitive exploration: Genetic variation in the prefrontal dopamine system predicts openness/intellect. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(4), 364371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeYoung, C.G. (2013). The neuromodulator of exploration: A unifying theory of the role of dopamine in personality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhawan, V., Ma, Y., Pillai, V., Spetsieris, P., Chaly, T., Belakhlef, A., … Eidelberg, D. (2002). Comparative analysis of striatal FDOPA uptake in Parkinson’s disease: Ratio method versus graphical approach. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 43(10), 13241330.Google ScholarPubMed
Fahn, S., Elton, R.L., & Members of the UPDRS Development Committee (1987). The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In Fahn, S., Marsden, C.D., Calne, D.B., & Goldstein, M. (Eds.), Recent Developments in Parkinson’s Disease (Vol. 2, pp. 153163, 293304). New York: Macmillan Healthcare Information.Google Scholar
Ferguson, E. & Bibby, P.A. (2012). Openness to experience and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis and r(equivalent) from risk ratios and odds ratios. British Journal of Health Psychology. 17(1), 85102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, C.R., Greene, P.E., Breeze, R.E., Tsai, W.Y., DuMouchel, W., Kao, R., … Fahn, S. (2001). Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson’s disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 344, 710719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgiev, D., Hamberg, K., Hariz, M., Forsgren, L., & Hariz, G.M. (2017). Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease: A clinical perspective. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 136(6), 570584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodglass, H. & Kaplan, E. (1983). The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Heaton, R.K. (1981). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Henchcliffe, C., Carter, J., Hanineva, A., Kang, Y., Babich, J., Gollomp, S.M., … McRae, C. (2016). Clinical and neuroimaging outcomes up to 18 years after fetal tissue transplant for Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 31 (Suppl 2), 708.Google Scholar
Hoehn, M.M. & Yahr, M.D. (1967). Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology, 17, 427442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, J.J., Hill, P.L., Payne, B.R., & Parisi, M.M. (2020). Linking openness to cognitive ability in older adulthood: The role of activity diversity. Aging & Mental Health, 7, 10791087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurado-Coronel, J.C., Cabezas, R., Rodriguez, M.F.A., Echeverria, V., Garcia-Segura, L.M., & Barreto, G.E. (2018). Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 50, 1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubomski, M., Rushworth, R.L., Lee, W., Bertram, K.L., & Williams, D.R. (2014). Sex differences in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 21(9), 15031506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, Y., Dhawan, V., Freed, C., Fahn, S., & Eidelberg, D. (2005). PET and embryonic dopamine cell transplantation in Parkinson’s disease. In Broderick, P.A., Rahni, D.N., & Kolodny, E.H. (Eds.), Bioimaging in Neurodegeneration (pp. 4558). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, C., Cherin, E., Diem, G., Vo, A.H., Ellgring, J.H., Russell, D., & Freed, C. (2003). Does personality change as a result of fetal tissue implantation in the brain? Journal of Neurology, 250(3), 282286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, C., Cherin, E., Yamazaki, G., Diem, G., Vo, A.H., Russell, D., … Freed, C.R. (2004). Effects of perceived treatment on quality of life and medical outcomes in a double-blind placebo surgery trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, C., Fazio, E., Kuhne, J., Ellgring, J., Russell, D., Hultgren, K., … Fahn, S. (2014). Longitudinal study of neural tissue implantation for treatment of Parkinson’s disease: Effects on quality of life from 1995 to 2013. Movement Disorders, 29 (Suppl 1), S448.Google Scholar
McRae, C., Li, J.P.F., Dunk, M., Cochran, R., Engblom, H., Gissen, M., … Henchcliffe, C. (2016). Very long-term follow-up of fetal tissue transplantation for treatment of Parkinson’s disease: Effects on quality of life from 1995 to 2015. Movement Disorders, 31(9), e10.Google Scholar
McRae, C., Russell, D., Dunk, M., Stern, Y., Ellgring, H., & Henchcliffe, C. (April, 2018). Baseline Differences between Survivors and Non-survivors of the Colorado/Columbia Fetal Implant Trial. Presentation at the meeting of G-Force PD, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Mirowsky, J. & Ross, C.E. (2000). Socioeconomic status and subjective life expectancy. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(2), 133151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishita, Y., Tange, C., Tomida, M., Otsuka, R., Ando, F., & Shimokata, H. (2019). Positive effects of openness on cognitive aging in middle-aged and older adults: A 13-year longitudinal study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 20722082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olanow, C.W., Goetz, C.G., Kordower, J.H., Stoessl, A.J., Brin, M.F., Shannon, K.M., … Freeman, T.B. (2003). A double-blind controlled trial of bilateral fetal nigral transplantation in Parkinson’s disease. Annals of Neurology, 54(3), 403414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Suilleabhain, P.S., Howard, S., & Hughes, B.M. (2018). Openness to experience and stress responsibility: An examination of cardiovascular and underlying hemodynamic trajectories within an acute stress exposure. PLoS One, 13(6), e0199221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santangelo, G., Piscopo, F., Barone, P., & Vitale, C. (2017). Personality in Parkinson’s disease: Clinical, behavioral, and cognitive correlates. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 374, 1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwab, R.S. & England, A.C. (1969). Projection technique for evaluating surgery in Parkinson’s disease. In Gillingham, F.J. & Donaldson, I.M.L. (Eds.), Third Symposium on Parkinson’s Disease (pp. 152157). Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone.Google Scholar
Sharp, E.S., Reynolds, C.A., Pedersen, N.L., & Gatz, M. (2010). Cognitive engagement and cognitive aging: Is openness protective? Psychology and Aging, 25(1), 6073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smillie, L.D. & Wacker, J. (2014). Dopaminergic foundations of personality and individual differences. Frontiers of Human Neuroscience, 8, 874. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, Y. (2002). What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(3), 448460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trott, C.T., Fahn, S., Greene, P., Dillon, S., Winfield, H., Winfield, L., … Stern, Y. (2003). Cognition following bilateral implants of embryonic dopamine neurons in PD: A double blind study. Neurology, 60, 19381943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turiano, N.A., Spiro, A. III, & Mroczek, D.K. (2012). Openness to experience and mortality in men: Analysis of trait and facets. Journal of Aging and Health, 24(4), 654672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Yang, Y.C., Schorpp, K., Boen, C., Johnson, M., & Harris, K.M. (2018). Socioeconomic status and biological risks for health and illness across the life course. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75(3), 613624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarulli, V., Barthold Jones, J.A., Oksuzyan, A., Lindahl-Jacobsen, R., Christensen, K., & Vaupel, J.W. (2018). Women live longer than men even during severe famines and epidemics. PNAS, 115(4), E832E840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed