Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-z4vvc Total loading time: 0.288 Render date: 2021-02-27T13:53:15.753Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Verbal Naming Test for Use with Older Adults: Development and Initial Validation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2015

Brian P. Yochim
Affiliation:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
Sherry A. Beaudreau
Affiliation:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California University of Queensland, Australia
J. Kaci Fairchild
Affiliation:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Maya V. Yutsis
Affiliation:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Neda Raymond
Affiliation:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
Leah Friedman
Affiliation:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Jerome Yesavage
Affiliation:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Naming or word-finding tasks are a mainstay of the typical neuropsychological evaluation, particularly with older adults. However, many older adults have significant visual impairment and there are currently no such word-finding tasks developed for use with older visually impaired populations. This study presents a verbal, non-visual measure of word-finding for use in the evaluation of older adults with possible dysnomia. Stimuli were chosen based on their frequency of usage in everyday spoken language. A 60-item scale was created and given to 131 older Veterans. Rasch analyses were conducted and differential item functioning assessed to eliminate poorly-performing items. The final 55-item scale had a coefficient alpha of 0.84 and correlated with the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Naming test, r=0.84, p<.01, Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Category Fluency, r=0.45, p<.01, and the D-KEFS Letter Fluency, r=0.40, p<.01. ROC analyses found the measure to have sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 85% for detecting dysnomia. Patients with dysnomia performed worse on the measure than patients with intact word-finding, t(84)=8.2, p<.001. Patients with no cognitive impairment performed significantly better than patients with mild cognitive impairment, who performed significantly better than patients with dementia. This new measure shows promise in the neuropsychological evaluation of word-finding ability in older adults with or without visual impairment. Future directions include the development of a shorter version and the generation of additional normative data. (JINS, 2015, 21, 1–10)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google ScholarPubMed
Balthazar, M.L.F., Yasuda, C.L., Pereira, F.R.S., Bergo, F.P.G., Cendes, F., & Damasceno, B.P. (2010). Coordinated and circumlocutory semantic naming errors are related to anterolateral temporal lobes in mild AD, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16, 10991107. doi:10.1017/S13556177100000998 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, R.M. (2012). Agnosia. In K.M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (5th ed., pp. 238295). New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Beeson, P.M., & Rapcsak, S.Z. (2006). The aphasias. In P.J. Snyder, P.D. Nussbaum & D.L. Robins (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology: A pocket handbook for assessment (2nd ed., pp. 436459). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, B.D., Seidenberg, M., Hermann, B.P., & Douville, K. (2003). Visual and auditory naming in patients with left or bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Research, 55, 2937. doi:10.1016/S0920-1211(03)00110-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benton, A.L., Sivan, A.B., de Hamsher, K.S., Varney, N.R., & Spreen, O. (1994). Contributions to neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). Orlando, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Benton, A.L., Varney, N.R., & Hamsher, K. (1978). Visuospatial judgment: A clinical test. Archives of Neurology, 35, 364367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, H. (2010). Neuroanatomy through clinical cases (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Bond, T.G., & Fox, C.M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brier, M.R., Maguire, M.J., Tillman, G.D., Hart, J., & Kraut, M.A. (2008). Event-related potentials in semantic memory retrieval. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 815822. doi:10.1017/S135561770808096X CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, H.-S., Mudar, R.A., Spence, J.S., Pudhiyidath, A., Eroh, J., DeLaRosa, B., … Hart, J. (2014). Age-related changes in feature-based object memory retrieval as measured by event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 100, 106114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullum, C.M., Weiner, M.F., Gehrmann, H.R., & Hynan, L.S. (2006). Feasibility of telecognitive assessment in dementia. Assessment, 13(4), 385390. doi:10.1177/1073191106289065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A.R., & Damasio, H. (1992). Brain and language. Scientific American, 267, 8895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A.R., & Tranel, D. (1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, of the United States of America, 90, 49574960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delis, D., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Delis, D., Kramer, J., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test – 2nd edition: Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. (2004). Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology, 122, 477485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, W., & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Google Scholar
Goodglass, H., & Wingfield, A. (Eds.). (1997). Anomia: Neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gorno-Tempini, M.L., Hillis, A.E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S.F., … Grossman, M. (2011). Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology, 76, 10061014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosch, M.C., Gottlieb, M.C., & Cullum, C.M. (2011). Initial practice recommendations for teleneuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(7), 11191133. doi:10.1080/13854046.2011.609840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, M., McMillan, C., Moore, P., Ding, L., Glosser, G., Work, M., & Gee, J. (2004). What’s in a name: Voxel-based morphometric analyses of MRI and naming difficulty in Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal degeneration. Brain, 127, 628649. doi:10.1093/brain/awh075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamberger, M.J., Goodman, R.R., Perrine, K., & Tamny, T. (2001). Anatomic dissociation of auditory and visual naming in the lateral temporal cortex. Neurology, 56, 5661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamberger, M.J., & Seidel, W.T. (2003). Auditory and visual naming tests: Normative and patient data for accuracy, response time, and tip-of-the-tongue. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 479489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamberger, M.J., Seidel, W.T., McKhann, G.M., & Goodman, R.R. (2010). Hippocampal removal affects visual but not auditory naming. Neurology, 74, 14881493. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dd40f0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, J.R., & Patterson, K. (1995). Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer’s disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications. Neuropsychologia, 33(4), 441459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huey, E.D., Goveia, E.N., Paviol, S., Pardini, M., Krueger, F., Zamboni, G., … Grafman, J. (2009). Executive dysfunction in frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal syndrome. Neurology, 72(5), 453459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, E.F., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1978). The Boston Naming Test: Experimental edition. Boston: Kaplan & Goodglass.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E.F., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). The Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Kirshner, H.S., Webb, W.G., & Kelly, M.P. (1984). The naming disorder of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 22(1), 2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, S.E., Lorch, M.P., & Pearson, D.M. (1989). Verb finding in aphasia. Cortex, 25, 5769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Laine, M., & Martin, N. (2006). Anomia: Theoretical and clinical aspects. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lee, A.G., & Coleman, A.L. (2004). Research agenda-setting program for geriatric ophthalmology. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 453458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Malow, B.A., Blaxton, T.A., Sato, S., Bookheimer, S.Y., Kufta, C.V., Figlozzi, C.M., & Theodore, W.H. (1996). Cortical stimulation elicits regional distinctions in auditory and visual naming. Epilepsia, 37(3), 245252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKhann, G.M., Knopman, D.S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B.T., Jack, C.R., Kawas, C.H., … Phelps, C.H. (2011). The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging – Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 7, 263269. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, G., Silveri, M.C., Nocentini, U., & Caramazza, A. (1988). Patterns of dissociation in comprehension and production of nouns and verbs. Aphasiology, 2, 351358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K.M., Finney, G.R., Meador, K.J., & Loring, D.W. (2010). Auditory responsive naming versus visual confrontation naming in dementia. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24, 103118. doi:10.1080/13854040903045074 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nebes, R.D. (1989). Semantic memory in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 377394. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.3.377 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholas, M., Barth, C., Obler, L.K., Au, R., & Albert, M.L. (1997). Naming in normal aging and dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. In H. Goodglass & A. Wingfield (Eds.), Anomia: Neuroanatomical and cognitive deficits (pp. 527). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Niemeier, J.P. (2010). Neuropsychological assessment for visually impaired persons with traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation, 27, 275283. doi:10.3233/NRE-2010-0609 Google ScholarPubMed
Obler, L.K., & Albert, M.L. (1979). Action naming test. Unpublished experimental edition.Google Scholar
Plassman, B.L., Langa, K.M., Fisher, G.G., Heeringa, S.G., Weir, D.R., Ofstedal, M.B., … Wallace, R.B. (2007). Prevalence of dementia in the United States: The Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study. Neuroepidemiology, 29, 125132. doi:10.1159/000109998 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabin, L.A., Barr, W.B., & Burton, L.A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 3365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randolph, C. (1998). Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google ScholarPubMed
Randolph, C., Lansing, A.E., Ivnik, R.J., Cullum, C.M., & Hermann, B.P. (1999). Determinants of confrontation naming performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14(6), 489496.Google Scholar
Ryskulova, A., Turczyn, T., Makuc, D., Cotch, M.F., Klein, R.J., & Janiszewski, R. (2008). Self-reported age-related eye diseases and visual impairment in the United States: Results of the 2002 National Health Interview Survey. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 454461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, W.K., & Martin, A. (2009). The anterior temporal lobes and the functional architecture of semantic memory. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 645649. doi:10.1017/S1355617709990348 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skelton-Robinson, M., & Jones, S. (1984). Nominal dysphasia and the severity of senile dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 168171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, R.A., & White, T. (2003). Neuropsychological Assessment Battery: Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Strauss, E., Sherman, E.M.S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trahan, D.E. (1998). Judgment of line orientation in patients with unilateral cerebrovascular lesions. Assessment, 5(3), 227235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tranel, D., Vianna, E., Manzel, K., Damasio, H., & Grabowski, T. (2009). Neuroanatomical correlates of the Benton facial recognition test and judgment of line orientation test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(2), 219233. doi:10.1080/13803390802317542 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, L.W., Doineau, D., Johnson, S., & King, D. (1996). Educational and gender normative data for the Boston Naming Test in a group of older adults. Brain and Language, 53, 260266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T., & Stern, R.A. (2003). Neuropsychological assessment battery: Psychometric and technical manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Yochim, B., Baldo, J., Nelson, A., & Delis, D.C. (2007). D-KEFS Trail Making Test performance in patients with lateral prefrontal cortex lesions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(04), 704709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yochim, B.P., Kane, K.D., & Mueller, A.E. (2009). Naming test of the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery: Convergent and discriminant validity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 575583. doi:10.1093/arclin/acp053 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yochim, B.P., Rashid, K., Raymond, N., & Beaudreau, S.A. (2013). How frequently are words used on naming tests used in spoken conversation? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(6), 973987. doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.797501 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zec, R.F., Burkett, N.R., Markwell, S.J., & Larsen, D.L. (2007). A cross-sectional study of the effects of age, education, and gender on the Boston Naming Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 587616. doi:10.1080/13854040701220028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 47
Total number of PDF views: 316 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Verbal Naming Test for Use with Older Adults: Development and Initial Validation
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Verbal Naming Test for Use with Older Adults: Development and Initial Validation
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Verbal Naming Test for Use with Older Adults: Development and Initial Validation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *