Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T19:59:42.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Insured Group Pension Plans and Ancillary Benefits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Extract

1.1. Pension schemes and other plans written on an insured group basis present some of the most fascinating, challenging and paradoxical aspects of life offices’ business in the United Kingdom.

1.2. The fascination stems from each group scheme being a unique, unpredictable and sensitive unit, covering perhaps just a handful of lives or possibly many thousands of lives. Once established it may thrive and grow indefinitely.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pingstone, G. W. (1951). Group life and pension schemes including group family income benefit schemes. J. Z. A., 77, 335.Google Scholar
Elphinstone, M. D. W. and Melton, M. W. (1955). With-profits group pension schemes. T.F.A., 23, 85.Google Scholar
Ogborn, M. E. and Wallas, G. E. (1955). Deferred annuities with participation in profits. J. Z. A., 81, 261.Google Scholar
Edey, J. (1956). A system of distribution of surplus for participating deferred annuities. J. Z. A., 82, 179.Google Scholar
Pingstone, G. W. (1957). The history and development of insured retirement benefit schemes in Great Britain. Transactions of the 15th International Congress of Actuaries, Vol. 1, 363.Google Scholar
Armitage, P. B. (1958). Group life assurance. J. S. S., 15, 299.Google Scholar
Heywood, G. and Lander, M. (1961). Pension fund valuations in modern conditions. J. Z. A., 87, 314.Google Scholar
Madders, P. M. (1961). The extra premium for a premium rebate benefit in recurrent single premium group life assurance. J. S. S., 16, 346.Google Scholar
Day, J. G. and Mckelvey, K. M. (1963). The treatment of assets in the actuarial valuation of a pension fund. J. I. A., 90, 104.Google Scholar
Douse, M. I. (1964). Developments in methods of pension provision during the past twenty years by means of insured schemes. Transactions of the 17th International Congress of Actuaries, Vol. II, 502.Google Scholar
Macharg, J. M. (1964). The development of with-profit pension plans in post-war Britain. Transactions of the 17th International Congress of Actuaries, Vol. II, 639.Google Scholar
Snelson, R. E. (1967). Modern methods of costing insured pension schemes. J. S. S., 19, 1.Google Scholar
National Report (1968). History and description of bonus systems in the United Kingdom. Transactions of the 18th International Congress of Actuaries, Vol. 1, 79.Google Scholar
Daw, R. H. (1971). A comparison of mortality and sickness in relation to geographical and socioeconomic factors. J.I.A., 97, 17.Google Scholar
Humphrey, G. T., Langham, F. R., Snelson, R. E. and Sparks, J. D. (1970). Pensions and company finance. J. I. A., 96, 189.Google Scholar
Hamilton-Jones, J. (1972). Actuarial aspects of long-term sickness insurance. J. Z. A., 98, 17.Google Scholar
Coe, L. D. (1972). Private pension schemes and social insurance. Transactions of the 19th International Congress of Actuaries, Vol. 3, 383.Google Scholar
Lyon, C. S. S. (1972). Occupational pension schemes as a second tier of social security. Transactions of the 19th International Congress of Actuaries, Vol. 3, 491.Google Scholar
Smith, K. G. (1972). Private pension schemes and social insurance. Present position and possible future trends in the United Kingdom. Transactions of the 19th International Congress of Actuaries, Vol. 3, 531.Google Scholar
Tutt, L. W. G. (1972). Index-linked group pension schemes within Great Britain: some practical considerations. Transactions of the 19th International Congress of Actuaries, Vol. 1, 641.Google Scholar