Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-s65px Total loading time: 0.234 Render date: 2021-03-04T20:21:33.015Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

REJOINDER TO ROSS: MORE ON THE ROBBINS–SAMUELSON ARGUMENT PATTERN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article
Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Bernheim, Douglas and Rangel, Antonio. 2008. “Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics.” In Caplin, A. and Schotter, A., eds., The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 155–92.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1989. “True Believers.” In The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1335.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1991. “Real Patterns.” The Journal of Philosophy 88: 2751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 1994. “Restabilizing Dynamics.” Economics and Philosophy 10: 243–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 2006. “Integrability, Rationalizability, and Path-Dependency in the History of Demand Theory.” In Mirowski, P. and Hands, D. W., eds., Agreement on Demand: Consumer Theory in the Twentieth Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press [Annual Supplement to Volume 38 of History of Political Economy], pp. 153–85.Google Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 2007. “Effective Tension in Robbins's Economic Methodology.” Economica [forthcoming].Google Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 2008. “Introspection, Revealed Preference and Neoclassical Economics: A Critical Response to Don Ross on the Robbins–Samuelson Argument Pattern.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 30 (4): 453478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel. 2008. “Mindless or Mindful Economics: A Methodological Evaluation.” In Caplin, A. and Schotter, A., eds., The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John R. and Allen, R. G. D.. 1934. “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value, Parts I and II.” Economica 2: 52–76, 196219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladyman, James and Ross, Don (with Spurrett, David and Collier, John). 2007. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1989. “How to Do Things with Metaphors: Paul Samuelson and the Science of Neoclassical Economics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20: 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip and Hands, D. Wade. 1998. "A Paradox of Budgets: The Postwar Stabilization of American Neoclassical Demand Theory.” In Morgan, M. S. and Rutherford, M., eds., From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press [Annual Supplement to Volume 30 of History of Political Economy], pp. 269–92.Google Scholar
Moscati, Ivan. 2007. “Early Experiments in Consumer Demand Theory: 1930–1970.” History of Political Economy 39: 359401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 1st edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1953. “Robertson on Utility and Scope.” Economica 20: 99111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Don. 2000. “Rainforest Realism: A Dennettian Stance.” In Ross, D., Brock, A., and Thompson, D., eds., Dennett's Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 126.Google Scholar
Ross, Don. 2005. Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Don. 2009. “Reply to Hands: On the Robbins–Samuelson Argument Pattern.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (1): 93103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour.” Economica 5: 6171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1948. “Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference.” Economica 15: 243–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, Louis L. 1931. “The Indifference Function.” Journal of Social Psychology 2: 139–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Stanley. 2006. The Foundations of Paul Samuelson's Revealed Preference Theory. London: Routledge [1st edition 1978].Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 27 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 4th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

REJOINDER TO ROSS: MORE ON THE ROBBINS–SAMUELSON ARGUMENT PATTERN
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

REJOINDER TO ROSS: MORE ON THE ROBBINS–SAMUELSON ARGUMENT PATTERN
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

REJOINDER TO ROSS: MORE ON THE ROBBINS–SAMUELSON ARGUMENT PATTERN
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *