Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:40:10.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On presentation of PSL (2, pn)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

C. M. Campbell
Affiliation:
University of St. AndrewsNorth Haugh St. Andrews Fife KY 16 9SS, Scotland
E. F. Robertson
Affiliation:
University of St. AndrewsNorth Haugh St. Andrews Fife KY 16 9SS, Scotland
P. D. Williams
Affiliation:
California State University5500 University Parkway San Bernardino, California 92407, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We give presentations for the groups PSL(2, pn), p prime, which show that the deficiency of these groups is bounded below. In particular, for p = 2 where SL(2, 2n) = PSL(2, 2n), we show that these groups have deficiency greater than or equal to – 2. We give deficiency – 1 presentations for direct products of SL(2, 2n) for coprime ni. Certain new efficient presentations are given for certain cases of the groups considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1990

References

[1]Beetham, M. J., ‘A set of generators and relations for the groups PSL(2, q), q odd’, J. London Math. Soc. 3 (1971), 554557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Berlekamp, E. R., Algebraic coding theory (McGraw-Hill, 1968).Google Scholar
[3]Bussey, W. H., ‘Generational relations for the abstract group simply isomorphic with the group LF[2, pn]’, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 3 (1905), 296315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Campbell, C. M. and Robertson, E. F., ‘Classes of groups related to Fa, b, c’, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 78 (1978), 209218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Campbell, C. M. and Robertson, E. F., ‘A deficiency zero presentation for SL(2, p)’, Bull. London Math. Soc. 12 (1980), 1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Campbell, C. M. and Robertson, E. F., ‘The efficiency of simple groups of order < 105’, Comm. Algebra 10 (1982), 217225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Campbell, C. M. and Robertson, E. F., ‘On a class of groups related to SL(2, 2n)’, Computational Group Theory, edited by Atkinson, M. D., pp. 4349 (Academic Press, London, 1984).Google Scholar
[8]Campbell, C. M., Kawamata, T., Miyamoto, I., Robertson, E. F., and Williams, P. D., ‘Deficiency zero presentations for certain perfect groups’, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 103 (1986), 6371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Cohn, P. M., Algebra, Vol. 2 (Wiley, London, 1977).Google Scholar
[10]Huppert, B., Endliche Gruppen I (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Kenne, P. E., ‘Efficient presentations for three simple groups’, Comm. Algebra 14 (1986), 797800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Robertson, E. F., ‘Efficiency of finite simple groups and their covering groups’, Contemp. Math. 45 (1985), 287294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Robertson, E. F. and Williams, P. D., ‘Efficient presentations of the groups PSL(2, 2p) and SL(2, 2p)’, Bull. Canad. Math. Soc. 32 (1989), 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Sinkov, A., ‘A note on a paper by J. A. Todd’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 45 (1939), 762765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Sunday, J. G., ‘Presentations of the groups SL(2, m) and PSL(2, m)’, Canad. J. Math. 24 (1972), 11291131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Todd, J. A., ‘A second note on the linear fractional group’, J. London Math. Soc. 2 (1936), 103107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Williams, P. D., Presentations of linear groups (Ph. D. thesis, University of St. Andrews, 1982).Google Scholar
[18]Zassenhaus, H. J., ‘A presentation of the groups PSL(2, p) with three defining relations’, Canad. J. Math. 21 (1969), 310311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Zierler, N. and Brilihart, J., ‘On primitive trinomials (mod 2)’, Inform, and Control 13 (1968), 541554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar