Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Philosophical implications of Tarski's work1

  • Patrick Suppes (a1)

Extract

In his published work and even more in conversations, Tarski emphasized what he thought were important philosophical aspects of his work. The English translation of his more philosophical papers [56m] was dedicated to his teacher Tadeusz Kotarbiński, and in informal discussions of philosophy he often referred to the influence of Kotarbiński. Also, the influence of Leśniewski, his dissertation adviser, is evident in his early papers. Moreover, some of his important papers of the 1930s were initially given to philosophical audiences. For example, the famous monograph on the concept of truth ([33m], [35b]) was first given as two lectures to the Logic Section of the Philosophical Society in Warsaw in 1930. Second, his paper [33], which introduced the concepts of ω-consistency and ω-completeness as well as the rule of infinite induction, was first given at the Second Conference of the Polish Philosophical Society in Warsaw in 1927. Also [35c] was based upon an address given in 1934 to the conference for the Unity of Science in Prague; [36] and [36a] summarize an address given at the International Congress of Scientific Philosophy in Paris in 1935. The article [44a] was published in a philosophical journal and widely reprinted in philosophical texts. This list is of course not exhaustive but only representative of Tarski's philosophical interactions as reflected in lectures given to philosophical audiences, which were later embodied in substantial papers. After 1945 almost all of Tarski's publications and presentations are mathematical in character with one or two minor exceptions. This division, occurring about 1945, does not, however, indicate a loss of interest in philosophical questions but is a result of Tarski's moving to the Department of Mathematics at Berkeley. There he assumed an important role in the development of logic within mathematics in the United States.

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All
1

The final version of this paper has benefitted from the excellent critical comments 1 received from Solomon Feferman and Robert Vaught, as well as an anonymous referee.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Beth, E. W. [1953] On Padoa's method in the theory of definition, Indagationes Mathematicae, vol. 15, pp. 330339.
Carnap, R. [1947] Meaning and necessity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
Etchemendy, J. [1988] Tarski on truth and logical consequence, this Journal, vol. 53, pp. 5179.
Gödel, K. [1931] über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandte Systeme. I, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, vol. 38, pp. 173198; English translation in From Frege to Gödel: a source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931 (J. van Heijenoort, editor), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1967, pp. 596–616.
Hilbert, D. [1897] Grundlagen der Geometrie, Teubner, Leipzig (7th ed., 1930).
Hodges, W. [1986] Truth in a structure, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, vol. 86, pp. 135151.
Kanger, S. [1957a] Provability in logic, Stockholm Studies in Philosophy, vol. 1, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.
Kanger, S. [1957b] The morning star paradox, Theoria, vol. 23, pp. 111.
Kanger, S. [1957c] A note on quantification and modalities, Theoria, vol. 23, pp. 133134.
Kripke, S. [1959] A completeness theorem in modal logic, this Journal, vol. 24, pp. 114.
Kripke, S. [1963a] Semantical analysis of modal logic, I: Normal modal propositional calculi, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 9, pp. 6796.
Kripke, S. [1963b] Semantical considerations on modal logics, Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 16, pp. 8394.
Löwenheim, L. [1915] Über Möglichkeiten im Relativkalkül, Mathematische Annalen, vol. 76, pp. 447470.
Montague, R. [1974] Formal philosophy(Thomason, R., editor), Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Nagel, E. [1939] The formation of modern conceptions of formal logic in the development of geometry, Osiris, vol. 7, pp. 142224.
Nicod, J. [1924] La géométrie dans le monde sensible, Librairie Félix Alcan, Paris (reprint, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1962).
Padoa, A. [1902] Un nouveau système irréductible de postulats pour l’algèbre, Comptes rendus du deuxième congrès international des mathématiciens (Paris, 1900), Gauthier-Villars, Paris, pp. 249256.
Padoa, A. [1903] Le probleme no. 2 de M. David Hilbert, L’Enseignement Mathématique, vol. 5, pp. 8591.
Pasch, M. [1882] Vorlesungen über neuere Geometrie, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2nd ed., 1926).
Robb, A. A. [1911] Optical geometry of motion: a new view of the theory of relativity, W. Heffer and Sons, Cambridge.
Robb, A. A. [1936] Geometry of time and space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Szczerba, L. W. [1986] Tarski and geometry, this Journal, vol. 51, pp. 907912.
Vaught, R. L. [1986] Alfred Tarski's work in model theory, this Journal, vol. 51, pp. 869882.
Veblen, O. and Young, J. W. [1910] Projective geometry, Ginn, Boston, Massachusetts (2 vols., second 1918); reprint, Blaisdell, New York, 1938.
Wagon, S. [1985] The Banach-Tarski paradox, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Whitehead, A. N. [1919] An enquiry concerning the principles of natural knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed