Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:57:39.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Index sets and degrees of unsolvability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Michael Stob*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Extract

The characterization of classes of r.e. sets by their index sets has proved valuable in producing new results about the r.e. sets and degrees. The classic example is Yates' proof [5, Theorem 7] of Sacks' density theorem for r.e. degrees using his classification of {e: WeTD) as Σ3(D) whenever D is r.e. Theorem 1 of this paper is a refinement of this index set theorem of Yates which has already proved to have interesting consequences about the r.e. degrees. This theorem was originally announced by Kallibekov [1, Theorem 1]. Kallibekov there proposed a new and ingenious method for doing priority arguments which has also since been used by Kinber [2]. Unfortunately his proof to this particular theorem contains an error. We have a totally different proof using standard techniques which is of independent interest.

The proof to Theorem 1 is an infinite injury priority argument. In §1 therefore we give a short summary of the infinite injury priority method. We draw heavily on the exposition of Soare [4] where a complete description of the method is given along with many examples. In §2 we prove the main theorem and also give what we think are the most interesting corollaries to this theorem announced by Kallibekov. In §3 we prove a theorem about Σ3 sets of indices of r.e. sets. This theorem is a strengthening of a theorem of Kinber [2, Theorem 1] which was proved using a modification of Kallibekov's technique. As application, we use our theorem to show that an r.e. set A has supersets of every r.e. degree iff A is not simple.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Kallibekov, S., Index sets and degrees of unsolvability, Algebra i Logika, vol. 10 (1971), pp. 316325.Google Scholar
[2]Kinber, E., On T-degrees of Post's hypersimple sets, Latvian Mathematical Yearbook, vol. 21 (1977), pp. 164170.Google Scholar
[3]Rogers, H. Jr., Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
[4]Soare, R. I., The infinite injury priority method, this Journal, vol. 4 (1976), pp. 513530.Google Scholar
[5]Yates, C. E. M., On the degrees of index sets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 121 (1966), pp. 309328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Yates, C. E. M., On the degrees of index sets. II, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 135 (1969), pp. 249266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Welch, L., Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, 1980.Google Scholar