Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

General models and extensionality

  • Peter B. Andrews (a1)

Extract

It is well known that equality is definable in type theory. Thus, in the language of [2], the equality relation between elements of type α is definable as , i.e., xα = yα iff every set which contains xα also contains yα. However, in a nonstandard model of type theory, the sets may be so sparse that the wff above does not denote the true equality relation. We shall use this observation to construct a general model in the sense of [2] in which the Axiom of Extensionality is not valid. Thus Theorem 2 of [2] is technically incorrect. However, it is easy to remedy the situation by slightly modifying the definition of general model.

Our construction will show that the Axiom Schema of Extensionality is independent even if one takes as an axiom schema.

We shall assume familiarity with, and use the notation of, [2] and §§2–3 of [1].

Copyright

References

Hide All
[1]Andrews, Peter B., General models, descriptions, and choice in type theory, this Journal, vol. 37 (1972), pp. 385394.
[2]Henkin, Leon, Completeness in the theory of types, this Journal, vol. 15 (1950), pp. 8191.

General models and extensionality

  • Peter B. Andrews (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.