Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:03:13.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Degrees of recursively enumerable topological spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Iraj Kalantari
Affiliation:
Western Illinois University, Macomb, Illinois 61455
J. B. Remmel
Affiliation:
University of California at San Diego Lajolla, California 92037

Extract

In [5], Metakides and Nerode introduced the study of recursively enumerable (r.e.) substructures of a recursively presented structure. The main line of study presented in [5] is to examine the effective content of certain algebraic structures. In [6], Metakides and Nerode studied the lattice of r.e. subspaces of a recursively presented vector space. This lattice was later studied by Kalantari, Remmel, Retzlaff and Shore. Similar studies have been done by Metakides and Nerode [7] for algebraically closed fields, by Remmel [10] for Boolean algebras and by Metakides and Remmel [8] and [9] for orderings. Kalantari and Retzlaff [4] introduced and studied the lattice of r.e. subsets of a recursively presented topological space. Kalantari and Retzlaff considered X, a topological space with ⊿, a countable basis. This basis is coded into integers and with the help of this coding, r.e. subsets of ω give rise to r.e. subsets of X. The notion of “recursiveness” of a topological space is the natural next step which gives rise to the question of what should be the “degree” of an r.e. open subset of X? It turns out that any r.e. open set partitions ⊿; into four sets whose Turing degrees become central in answering the question raised above.

In this paper we show that the degrees of the elements of the partition of ⊿ imposed by an r.e. open set can be “controlled independently” in a sense to be made precise in the body of the paper. In [4], Kalantari and Retzlaff showed that given A any r.e. set and any r.e. open subset of X, there exists an r.e. open set ℋ which is a subset of and is dense in (in a topological sense) and in which A is coded. This shows that modulo a nowhere dense set, an r.e. open set can become as complicated as desired. After giving the general technical and notational machinery in §1, and giving the particulars of our needs in §2, in §3 we prove that the set ℋ described above could be made to be precisely of degree of A. We then go on and establish various results (both existential and universal) on the mentioned partitioning of ⊿. One of the surprising results is that there are r.e. open sets such that every element of partitioning of ⊿ is of a different degree. Since the exact wording of the results uses the technical definitions of these partitioning elements, we do not summarize the results here and ask the reader to examine §3 after browsing through §§1 and 2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Kalantari, I., Major subsets in effective topology, Proceedings of the International Meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic, Patras, Greece, 1980 (to appear).Google Scholar
[2]Kalantari, I. and Leggett, A., Simple sets in effective topology, this Journal (to appear).Google Scholar
[3]Kalantari, I. and Leggett, A., Maximal sets in effective topology (forthcoming).Google Scholar
[4]Kalantari, I. and Retzlaff, A., Recursive constructions in topological spaces, this Journal, vol. 44 (1979), pp. 609625.Google Scholar
[5]Metakides, G. and Nerode, A., Recursion theory and algebra, Algebra and Logic, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 450, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1975, pp. 209219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Metakides, G. and Nerode, A., Recursively enumerable vector spaces, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 11 (1977), pp. 147171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Metakides, G. and Nerode, A., Effective content of field theory, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 17 (1979), pp. 289320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Metakides, G. and Remmel, J. B., Recursion theory on orderings. I, this Journal, vol. 44 (1979), pp. 383402.Google Scholar
[9]Remmel, J. B., Recursion theory on orderings. II, this Journal vol. 45 (1980), pp. 317333.Google Scholar
[10]Remmel, J. B., Recursively enumerable Boolean algebras, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 15 (1978), pp. 75106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Rogers, H., Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
[12]Sacks, G. E., Degrees of unsolvability (revised edition), Annals of Mathematical Studies, no. 55, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1966.Google Scholar