Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The consistency strength of choiceless failures of SCH

  • Arthur W. Apter (a1) (a2) and Peter Koepke (a3)

Abstract

We determine exact consistency strengths for various failures of the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis (SCH) in the setting of the Zermelo-Fraenkel axiom system ZF without the Axiom of Choice (AC). By the new notion of parallel Prikry forcing that we introduce, we obtain surjective failures of SCH using only one measurable cardinal, including a surjective failure of Shelah's pcf theorem about the size of the power set of ℵω. Using symmetric collapses to ℵω, , or , we show that injective failures at ℵω, , or can have relatively mild consistency strengths in terms of Mitchell orders of measurable cardinals. Injective failures of both the aforementioned theorem of Shelah and Silver's theorem that GCH cannot first fail at a singular strong limit cardinal of uncountable cofinality are also obtained. Lower bounds are shown by core model techniques and methods due to Gitik and Mitchell.

Copyright

References

Hide All
[1]Apter, A. and Koepke, P., The consistency strength ℵω and being Rowbottom cardinals without the Axiom of Choice, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 45 (2006), pp. 721737.
[2]Devlin, K. and Jensen, R. B., Marginalia to a theorem of Silver, ISILC Logic Conference (Proceedings of the International Summer Institute and Logic Colloquium, Kiel, 1974), Lecture Notes in Mathematics 499, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1975, pp. 115142.
[3]Dodd, A. J., The core model, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series #61, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
[4]Dodd, A. J. and Jensen, R. B., The core model, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 20 (1981), pp. 4375.
[5]Easton, W., Powers of regular cardinals, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (1970), pp. 139178.
[6]Gitik, M., Dropping cofinalities and gaps, preprint.
[7]Gitik, M., The negation of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis from ο(κ) = κ++, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 43 (1989), pp. 209234.
[8]Gitik, M., The strength of the failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 51 (1991), pp. 215240.
[9]Gitik, M., Blowing up power of a singular cardinal-wider gaps, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 116 (2002), pp. 138.
[10]Gitik, M., The power set function, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Beijing 2002), vol. 1, Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2002, pp. 507513.
[11]Gitik, M., Prikry-type forcings, Handbook of set theory, forthcoming.
[12]Gitik, M. and Mitchell, W., Indiscernible sequences for extenders, and the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 82 (1996), pp. 273316.
[13]Gitik, M., Schindler, R., and Shelah, S., Pcf theory and Woodin cardinals, Logic Colloquium '02, Lecture Notes in Logic 27, Association for Symbolic Logic, La Jolla, California, 2006, pp. 172205.
[14]Jech, T., Set theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 2003, The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded.
[15]Magidor, M., Changing cofinality of cardinals, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 99(1978), pp. 6171.
[16]Mcdermott, M., Doctoral Dissertation, Oxford University.
[17]Shelah, S., Cardinal arithmetic, Oxford Logic Guides, vol. 29, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.
[18]Silver, J., On the singular cardinals problem, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Vancouver, British Columbia 1974), vol. 1, Canadian Mathematical Congress, Montreal, Quebec, 1975, pp. 265268.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The consistency strength of choiceless failures of SCH

  • Arthur W. Apter (a1) (a2) and Peter Koepke (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.