Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:38:05.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poverty Dynamics and Social Exclusion: An Analysis of Norwegian Panel Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

ESPEN DAHL ,
TONE FLØTTEN  and
THOMAS LORENTZEN
ESPEN DAHL
Affiliation:
Care, Health and Welfare, and Research Group for Inclusive Social Welfare Policies, Oslo University College, Postboks 4 St., Olavs plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway email: Espen.Dahl@hio.no
TONE FLØTTEN
Affiliation:
Fafo, Borggata 2B, Tøyen, 0608 Oslo, Norway
THOMAS LORENTZEN
Affiliation:
International Research Institute of Stavanger (IRIS), Thormøhlensgt. 55, 5008 Bergen, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article aims to examine the relationship between poverty and social exclusion in a dynamic perspective. We look at two dimensions of social exclusion (lack of friendship relationships and lack of participation in civic organisations), and scrutinise two aspects of poverty: poverty duration (that is, ‘previously poor’, ‘recently poor’, ‘recurrent poor’ and ‘permanently poor) and poverty gradation (defined as 50, 60 and 70 per cent of median income). For income, panel data for four waves are used (1997–2000). For the social exclusion indicators, data are available only for one wave, the year 2000. We find that poor people are more likely to see friends regularly than non-poor, but this is primarily caused by some third factor such as work activity or ethnicity, and not by poverty per se. With respect to relationship to civic organisations, the poor are less likely to participate than the non-poor. This occurs regardless of where the poverty line is drawn and the duration of poverty. These results are discussed in light of current anti-poverty policies and recent theories and research on social exclusion and social capital.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 231 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6, P. (1997), Escaping Poverty. From Safety Nets to Network of Opportunity, London: Demos.Google Scholar
Allardt, E. (1975), Att ha, att älska, att vara. Om välfärd i Norden, Lund: Argos.Google Scholar
Barstad, A. (2000), ‘Hvem er de ensomme og isolerte’, Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning, 2: 3, 67–84.Google Scholar
Berthoud, R., Bryan, M. and Bardasi, E. (2004), ‘The dynamics of deprivation: the relationship between income and material deprivation over time’, Research Report No. 19, Department for Work and Pensions, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. and Finch, N. (2003), ‘Overlaps in dimensions of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 4, 513–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J. and Piachaud, D. (1999), ‘Social exclusion in Britain 1991–1995’, Social Policy and Administration, 33: 3, 227–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchardt, T., Le Grand, J. and Piachaud, D. (2002), ‘Introduction’, in Hills, J., Grand, J. Le and Piachaud, D. (eds), Understanding Social Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clasen, J., Gould, A. and Vincent, J. (1997), Long-term Unemployment and the Threat of Social Exclusion: A Cross-National Analysis of the Position of Long-Term Unemployed People in Germany, Sweden and Britain, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, E. and Lorentzen, T. (2003), ‘Dynamics of social assistance: the Norwegian experience in comparative perspective’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 12: 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat (2003), European Social Statistics. Income, Poverty and Social Exclusion, 2nd Report, Executive Summary, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2003), Social Capital, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fløtten, T., Dahl, E. and Grønningsæter, A. (2001), ‘Den norske fattigdommen – hvordan arter den seg, hvem rammes og hva kan vi gjøre med det?’, Fafo Working Paper no. 2001/16, Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
Fløtten, T. (2003a), ‘Hvordan har de fattige det?’, Samfunnsspeilet, 6/2003.Google Scholar
Fløtten, T. (2003b), ‘The relationship between poverty and social exclusion – a conceptual discussion’, in Heggen, K., Bergem, R., KvalsundR. Høydal, R. R. Høydal, R. and Myklebust, J. O. (eds), Marginalization and Social Exclusion, Conference report, Volda: Møre research and Volda University College.Google Scholar
Fløtten, T. (2006), Poverty and Social Exclusion – Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Comparative Study of Norway and Estonia, Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
Fouarge, D. and Layte, R. (2005), ‘Welfare regimes and poverty dynamics: the duration and recurrence of poverty spells in Europe’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 3, 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halleröd, B. (1994), ‘Poverty in Sweden: a new approach to direct measurement of consensual poverty’, Umeå Studies in Sociology, University of Umeå.Google Scholar
Halleröd, B. and Heikillä, M. (1999), ‘Poverty and social exclusion in the Nordic countries’, in Kautto, M.Heikkilä, M., Hvinden, B., Marklund, S. and Ploug, N. (eds), Nordic Social Policy, Changing Welfare States, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howarth, C., Kenway, P., Palmer, G. and Miorelli, R. (1999), Monitoring Poverty and Social Exclusion 1999, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Kleven, Ø. (2002), Samordnet levekårsundersøkelse 2000-panelundersøkelsen, Notat 2002/41, Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
Langeland, O. (ed.) (1999), Mellom frihet og fellesskap, Oslo: Fafo – Tiden.Google Scholar
Normann, T. M. (2004), Samordnet Levekårsundersøkelse 2002 – panelundersøkelsen, Dokumentasjonsrapport, notat 55, Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
Norwegian Research Council (2005), Sosial capital: Innstilling fra utredningsutvalg oppnevnt av Norges forskningsråd, Oslo: Norges forskningsråd.Google Scholar
Paugam, S. (1996) ‘Poverty and social disqualification: a comparative analysis of cumulative social disadvantage in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6: 4, 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. (2003), ‘Social cohesion, social exclusion and social quality’, Paper presented to the ESPAnet conference, Copenhagen, 13–15 November.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Room, G. (1995), Beyond the Threshold: The Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Room, G. (2000), ‘Trajectories of social exclusion: the wider context for the third and first worlds’, in Gordon, D. and Townsend, P. (eds), Breadline Europe: The Measurement of Poverty, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Saraceno, C. (2002), Social Assistance Dynamics in Europe: National and Local Poverty Regimes, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. and Adelman, L. (2006), ‘Income poverty, deprivation and exclusion: a comparative study of Australia and Britain’, Journal of Social Policy, 35: 4, 559–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, K. S. (2005), ‘Material and financial hardship and income-based poverty measures in the USA’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 1, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sletten, M., Fløtten, T. and Bakken, A. (2004), ‘Vennskapets pris – fattigdom og sosial isolasjon i ungdomstida’, Tidsskrift for Ungdomsforskning, 4: 2, 55–76.Google Scholar
St.meld. no. 6 (2002–2003), Tiltaksplan mot fattigdom, Oslo: The Ministry of Social Affairs.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1979), Poverty in the United Kingdom, London: Penguin Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. (1997), Living Conditions and Inequality in the European Union, Eurostat: Population and Social Conditions, E/1997-3, Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
Walker, A. and Walker, C. (1997), Britain Divided. The Growth of Social Exclusion in the 1980s and 1990s, London: Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
Whelan, C. T., Layte, R., Mâitre, B. and Nolan, B. (2001), ‘Income, deprivation, and economic strain: an analysis of the European Community household panel’, European Sociological Review, 17: 4, 357–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, C. T., Layte, R. and Maître, B. (2002), ‘Multiple deprivation and persistent poverty in the European Union’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12: 2, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, C. T., Layte, R. and Maître, B. (2003), ‘Persistent income poverty and deprivation in the European Union: an analysis of the first three waves of the European Community Household Panel’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 1, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, C. T., Layte, R. and Maître, B. (2004), ‘Understanding the mismatch between income poverty and deprivation: a dynamic compartive analysis’, European Sociological Review, 20: 4, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollebæk, D. and Selle, P. (2002), Det nye organisasjonssamfunnet. Demokrati i omforming, Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar