Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Persistence of Welfare Receipt and Unemployment in Germany: Determinants and Duration Dependence

  • KATRIN HOHMEYER (a1) and TORSTEN LIETZMANN (a1)

Abstract

Although the German economy managed the last economic recession comparatively well, it suffers from high and stagnating long-term unemployment and benefit receipt. This article is the first to study the duration and determinants of welfare benefit (“unemployment benefit II”) receipt in Germany as a whole, with special attention on duration dependence. The recipients of the means-tested household benefit are not necessarily registered as unemployed, but are, for example, employed with insufficient earnings, in training measures or economically inactive. Due to the heterogeneous situations of welfare recipients, separately studying welfare receipt and unemployment is necessary. By using exceptionally rich administrative data on a 1% random sample of welfare recipients from between 2005 and 2014, we estimate discrete-time hazard rate models that control for unobserved heterogeneity. The first benefit and unemployment episodes for first welfare recipients between 2006 and 2012 (n = 26,163) are traced monthly until 31 December 2014. Recipients leave unemployment more quickly than welfare. Sociodemographic characteristics, labour market resources and the duration seem to affect both processes. Household composition is less important for leaving unemployment than for leaving welfare. Overall, the results indicate that leaving unemployment and leaving welfare receipt are two different processes that need distinct policies.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Persistence of Welfare Receipt and Unemployment in Germany: Determinants and Duration Dependence
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Persistence of Welfare Receipt and Unemployment in Germany: Determinants and Duration Dependence
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Persistence of Welfare Receipt and Unemployment in Germany: Determinants and Duration Dependence
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

Hide All
Allison, P.D. (1982), ‘Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories’, Sociological Methodology, 13, 6198.
Antoni, M., Ganzer, A. and vom Berge, P. (2016), Sample of integrated labour market biographies (SIAB) 1975-2014, FDZ-Datenreport, 04/2016 (en), Nuremberg: IAB.
Bäckman, O. and Bergmark, A. (2011), ‘Escaping welfare? Social assistance dynamics in Sweden’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21: 5, 486500.
Bane, M.J. and Ellwood, D.T. (1985), The Dynamics of Dependence: The Routes to Self-Sufficiency, Report to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Cambridge, Mass.: Urban Systems Research and Engineering.
Bane, M.J. and Ellwood, D.T. (1994), Welfare Realities - From Rethoric to Reform, Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
Bentolila, S. and Jansen, M. (2016), Long-Term Unemployment After the Great Recession: Causes and remedies, VoxEU.org, London: CEPR Press.
Bergmark, A. and Bäckman, O. (2004), ‘Stuck in Welfare? Long-term Social Assistance Recipiency in Sweden’, European Sociological Review, 20: 5, 425443.
Blank, R.M. (1989), ‘Analyzing the Length of Welfare Spells’, Journal of Public Economics, 39, 245273.
Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (2012), The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bothfeld, S. and Rosenthal, P. (2018), ‘The End of Social Security as we know it– The Erosion of Status Protection in German Labour Market Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 47: 2, 275294.
Bruckmeier, K. and Hohmeyer, K. (2018), Arbeitsaufnahmen von Arbeitslosengeld-II-Empfängern: Nachhaltige Integration bleibt schwierig, IAB-Kurzbericht 02/2018, Nuremberg: IAB.
Buhr, P., Lietzmann, T. and Voges, W. (2010), ‘Lange Wege aus Hartz IV? Zur Dynamik von Mindestsicherung unter dem Bundessozialhilfegesetz und dem SGB II’, ZeS Report, 15: 1, 16.
Carpentier, S., Neels, K. and Van den Bosch, K. (2014), ‘How Do Exit Rates from Social Assistance Benefit in Belgium Vary with Individual and Local Agency Characteristics?’, Research in Labor Economics: Safety Nets and Benefit Dependence, 39, 151187.
Carpentier, S., Neels, K. and Van den Bosch, K. (2017a), ‘Exit from and re-entry into social assistance benefit in Belgium among people with migration background and the native-born’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 26: 4, 366383.
Carpentier, S., Neels, K. and Van den Bosch, K. (2017b), ‘Do First- and Second-Generation Migrants Stay Longer in Social Assistance Than Natives in Belgium?’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 18: 4, 11671190.
Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (2011), ‘Unemployment protection and labour market change in Europe: towards “triple integration”?’, in Clasen, J., and Clegg, D. (eds.), Regulating the Risk of Unemployment - National adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clasen, J. and Goerne, A. (2011), ‘Exit Bismarck, Enter Dualism? Assessing Contemporary German Labour Market Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 40: 4, 795810.
Cleves, M., Gutierrez, R.G., Gould, W. and Marchenko, Y. (2008), An introduction to survival analysis using stata, College Station, Texas: Stata Press.
Dahl, E. and Lorentzen, T. (2003a), ‘Explaining Exit to Work among Social Assistance Recipients in Norway: Heterogeneity or Dependency?’, European Sociological Review, 19: 5, 519536.
Dahl, E. and Lorentzen, T. (2003b), ‘Dynamics of social assistance: the Norwegian experience in comparative perspective’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 12, 289301.
Department for Statistics of the Federal Employment Agency (2018), Strukturen der Grundsicherung SGB II (Monats- und Jahreszahlen ab 2005), Juni 2018, Nuremberg.
Duell, N., Thurau, L. and Vetter, T. (2016), Long-term Unemployment in the EU: Trends and Policies, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Dustmann, C., Fitzenberger, B., Schönberg, U. and Spitz-Oener, A. (2014), ‘From Sick Man of Europe to Economic Superstar: Germany’s Resurgent Economy’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28: 1, 167188.
Eichhorst, W., Grienberger-Zingerle, M. and Konle-Seidl, R. (2010), ‘Activating Labor Market and Social Policies in Germany: From Status Protection to Basic Income Support’, German Policy Studies, 6: 1, 65105.
Eichhorst, W. and Tobsch, V. (2015), ‘Not so standard anymore? Employment duality in Germany’, Journal for Labour Market Research, 48: 2, 8195.
Fouarge, D. and Layte, R. (2005), ‘Welfare Regimes and Poverty Dynamics: The Duration and Recurrence of Poverty Spells in Europe’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 4, 407426.
Graf, T. and Rudolph, H. (2009), Dynamik im SGB II 2005-2007- Viele Bedarfsgemeinschaften bleiben lange bedürftig, IAB Kurzbericht 5/2009, Nuremberg: IAB.
Gregory, M. and Jukes, R. (2001), ‘Unemployment and Subsequent Earnings: Estimating Scarring Among British Men 1984-94’, The Economic Journal, 111, 607625.
Hansen, H.-T. (2009), ‘The Dynamics of Social Assistance Recipiency: Empirical Evidence from Norway’, European Sociological Review, 25: 2, 215231.
Haupt, A. and Nollmann, G. (2014), ‘Warum werden immer mehr Haushalte von Armut gefährdet?’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 66, 603627.
Immervoll, H., Jenkins, S.P. and Königs, S. (2015), Are Recipients of Social Assistance ‘Benefit Dependent’? Concepts, Measurement and Results for Selected Countries, IZA Discussion Paper 8786, Bonn: IZA.
Jacobi, L. and Kluve, J. (2007), ‘Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany’, Zeitschrift für Arbeitsmarktforschung, 40: 1, 4564.
Jahoda, M. (1982), Employment and Unemployment – a social-psychological analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, S.P. (2004a), PGMHAZ8: Stata module to estimate discrete time (grouped data) proportional hazards models, Statistical Software Components S438501: Boston College Department of Economics.
Jenkins, S.P. (2004b), HSHAZ: Stata module to estimate discrete time (grouped data) proportional hazards models, Statistical Software Components S444601: Boston College Department of Economics.
Jenkins, S.P. (2005), Survival Analysis. Unpublished manuscript, https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/files/teaching/stephenj/ec968/pdfs/ec968lnotesv6.pdf.
Königs, S. (2014), ‘State Dependence in Social Assistance Benefit Receipt in Germany Before and After the Hartz Reforms’, Research in Labor Economics: Saftey Nets and Benefit Dependence, 39, 107150.
Königs, S. (2018), ‘Micro-level dynamics of social assistance receipt: Evidence from four European countries’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 27: 2, 146156.
Konle-Seidl, R. (2016), Integration arbeitsmarktferner Personen im Ländervergleich: Kein Patentrezept in Sicht, IAB-Kurzbericht 01/2016, Nuremberg: IAB.
Leisering, L. and Leibfried, S. (1999), Time and Poverty in Western Welfare States - United Germany in Perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lietzmann, T. (2017), ‘The Contribution of Mothers Employment on Their Family s Chances of Ending Welfare Benefit Receipt in Germany. Analysis of a Two-Stage Process’, Sociological research online, 22: 2
Lockwood, B. (1991), ‘Information Externalities in the Labour Market and the Duration of Unemployment’, The Review of Economic Studies, 58: 4, 733753.
Mood, C. (2013), ‘Social Assistance dynamics in Sweden: Duration dependence and heterogeneity’, Social Science Research, 42, 120139.
Oxley, H., Dang, T.T. and Antolín, P. (2000), ‘Poverty Dynamics in Six OECD Countries’, OECD Economic Studies, 30: 1, 2000.
Rüb, F. and Werner, D. (2008), ‘“Den Arbeitsmarkt” gibt es nicht - Arbeitsmarktregionen des SGB II im Vergleich’, Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, 28: 2, 93108.
Saraceno, C. (2002), Social assistance dynamics in Europe. National and local poverty regimes, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Schels, B. (2013), ‘Persistence or transition: young adults and social benefits in Germany’, Journal of Youth Studies, 16: 7, 881900.
Seibert, H., Wurdack, A., Bruckmeier, K., Graf, T. and Lietzmann, T. (2017), Typische Verlaufsmuster beim Grundsicherungsbezug - Für einige Dauerzustand, für andere nur eine Episode, IAB Kurzbericht 4/2017, Nuremberg: IAB.
Taylor-Gooby, P., Gumy, J.M. and Otto, A. (2015), ‘Can ‘New Welfare’ Address Poverty through More and Better Jobs?’, Journal of Social Policy, 44: 1, 83104.
Weber, E. (2015), ‘The Labour Market in Germany: Reforms, Recession and Robustness’, De Economist, 163: 4, 461472.
Wunder, C. and Riphahn, R.T. (2014), ‘The dynamics of welfare entry and exit amongst natives and immigrants’, Oxford Economic Papers, 66, 580604.
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Hohmeyer and Lietzmann supplementary material
Appendix A1

 Word (44 KB)
44 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed